[W][M] Newbie Mafia XXI

On May 24 2016 00:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:

We do have "filter" button though under every post which allows you to view said player's posts in the game in a threaded mode. That's way superior to any ISO-system on any other site i have ever seen.

I think we don't have multiquotes since TL wasn't developed for playing mafia. I personally don't even like multiquotes since it makes posts harder to read and often people intentionally/unintentionally take the quotes out of context making them basically useless. Ofc that's just a preference thing in the end. I think another way is to copy the links for the posts and make a post where you give your analysis of said posts, then people can themselves follow the links and see if they agree with you or not. Imo it makes your post easier to read and follow and regardless if you have quoted the post you are referring to, people should anyways ALWAYS check the post in context. Everything can be scummy or not depending on the context.

On May 24 2016 01:39 QuickTwist wrote:
SC2Mafia has a very cool mechanic where the thread is automatically locked after a majority of votes. Pretty neat feature if you ask me.

On June 02 2016 01:48 Tumblewood wrote:
wow, that's more newbies than I've seen in the last month
/in if there's a spot left

On June 02 2016 22:05 Half the Sky wrote:




I'm not sure what in the gaming world kushmasta prefers/plays, but as for you Mage, some people clearly never learn...

##shoot NocturneMage

On June 02 2016 22:46 emperorchampion wrote:


Hmm I find dota a lot more relaxing than starcraft, that's pretty much why I ended up making the transition (well SC->LoL->dota)

On June 03 2016 03:10 Shapelog wrote:

I mean, I am part native american (and french) so obv I am going with the french.

Britdred vs Rench and Shative in the seven day war.

On June 04 2016 03:46 blkcoffee wrote:


what about the hour between roles going out and the silence period?

On June 04 2016 10:12 Jealous wrote:

EBWOP

Hyper-active in the pre-game, come Day 1 and you have what, 2 or 3 posts to your name over the course of 10 pages?

On June 04 2016 19:05 beentheredonethat wrote:
Hello guys, I caught up. There's a lot already to read into. Based on continuous activity, "careless/fearless" pushes and cool refinements of thoughts, I think Superbia is town and we should regard his thoughts a lot. Almost every single page we currently have contains a post of him, and while initial posts might be banter, I can say that from my experience that starting a game is always kind of rough to do.

Also, I like QuickTwist, also for the great activity. The fact that he votes Tumblewood because he gives him a townread ("I shouldn't be getting this much town cred already should I?") makes me think he's town.

However that brought me to filtering Tumblewood. The first two pages of his filter are useless. No pushes, no reads, nothing even remotely readable, which, for me, is mafia indicative. Well, page 3 is much better, and I like this line of thoughts:



So I'd also note Tumblewood as town. Besides the players that have not posted yet or do have a very low post activity, my strongest mafia read as of now is MoosyDoosy. His posts do not make sense, they feel rushed, "activity for the sake of activity" to appear townie, and they're partially total offtopic (see the post about CRISPR). Voting himself, while even against the rules afaik, and spitting out a big post:

+ Show Spoiler +

He is just confusing. There is no straight pattern, and I cannot see a goal that he tries to follow. All he does is stirring up chaos, then disappearing. I think he is scum.

##vote MoosyDoosy

On June 04 2016 20:02 Jealous wrote:

I was met with the same criticism not long ago and made this post an hour ago:



Whether you read the rest or not is up to you and your level of dedication. I was simply pursuing what I find to be a legitimate lead, which has led me to construct the following points on why I believe QT is a good vote for Day 1::

1. QT's posts, on average, lack substance (failing to answer questions, using memes as answers, dodgy responses in general, no analysis presented to substantiate claims).

2. QT voted for one person, then claimed to vote for another in this thread while making a vote post in the voting thread that did not corroborate his verbal stance, all while not even using the proper format for unvoting so therefore there is a strong possibility that he is intentionally misleading people.

There are more but I don't want to be too long-winded yet again.

On June 05 2016 12:11 Jealous wrote:

I see, thanks for the response. Seems like a pretty easy pit to fall into, haha.

On June 05 2016 08:23 scott31337 wrote:
I read QuickTwist's filter since he's the one I'm tied in votes for, and it's 6 pages of one-liners and a couple of magic early townreads and a "Maybe scum" on Tictock. It's pretty bad - wouldn't mind voting for him

On June 05 2016 03:01 beentheredonethat wrote:
EBWOP: Is MoosyDoosy able to emulate his town style as scum? thekushmountains, can you answer this?

On June 06 2016 07:49 Fecalfeast wrote:

I'd like to lynch you or btdt instead at this point

On June 06 2016 07:50 Jealous wrote:

Now that we're 10 minutes from the flip and fingers have been pointed your way depending on the flipread, it would make sense for you to go back on your previous words which suggested we should lynch QT.

On June 06 2016 09:37 Fecalfeast wrote:
you still here kush or did you just pop by to say that qt is town and then leave?

On June 06 2016 05:05 scott31337 wrote:
I still haven't gotten my role and I've PM'ed all three hosts phhbbt I have to vote though

On June 06 2016 05:20 scott31337 wrote:
Alright I finally got it I'm town

I kept thinking if I was mafia with QT and had already voted for him it'd be really bad lol

On June 06 2016 11:33 Fecalfeast wrote:

explain it to me please, why even have the first quote?

On June 05 2016 22:22 Skynx wrote:

You break my heart man, but i dunno what to do now. Shall i chat shit or just post very serious stuff...

On June 06 2016 11:56 Fecalfeast wrote:

i already mentioned btdt, and moosey

On June 06 2016 11:59 MoosyDoosy wrote:
o/ I'm always down for a lynch on me. :D

On June 06 2016 12:05 Jealous wrote:

He may or may not be, hard to tell from his scant post history and from the fact that he didn't vote at all. I'd lynch him just for not voting to be honest. If he is town and doesn't participate, he is useless to us. If he is scum and doesn't participate, then he'll flip red.

On June 06 2016 12:27 Jealous wrote:

That thought crossed my mind because he could be the town leader instead of nominating me.

On June 06 2016 13:01 Tumblewood wrote:

wow that is shit
all of those people are town

On June 08 2016 06:27 Superbia wrote:
Kush for serious, readerinos?

On June 08 2016 06:56 Superbia wrote:
Why is TT scum?

On June 08 2016 08:01 Jealous wrote:

But how would that make sense for a scum strategy?

The only plot that would make sense to me is that he knew QT would be lynched (should verify timestamp on this post vs. vote count at the time?), which is good for scum, so he wanted to bring me down once QT flipped town because I'd be seen as the major instigator of the movement, which is good for scum because I am town.

This actually makes sense, now that I think about it. However, it depends on the timestamp. I can't check it right now and I'll be home in a few hours but if someone can do that now it would give more credit to FF's theory, imo.

On June 19 2016 07:42 Shapelog wrote:

Weak reads for newbie 19,
Thought the vet and a obv town was mafia. Townread both mafia members when it counted.

I mean really,

Considering the fact that they got to lylo, lynched you, and was decently town read. And that for all the scum team, this was their first game is very impressive. None of them had any experience as town, and didn't know how to act in that regard,

On June 08 2016 06:28 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:


skankx, ec, tt

On June 08 2016 07:42 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
ya i dont remember why i townread btdt

On June 21 2016 09:22 Jealous wrote:

Seems like a good read with poor support is no better than a poor read ):