|
On May 06 2016 06:31 marvellosity wrote: tempted just to townread you shape for your filter length when you seemed to suffer burnout in the game that just finished Get more evidence pointing to my towniness, then you can townread me.
At-most, Town lean. 1 thing like that shouldn't make be pass a Town lean like that.
On May 06 2016 06:32 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 06:31 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 06:26 marvellosity wrote:On May 06 2016 06:25 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 06:23 marvellosity wrote:On May 06 2016 06:22 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 06:17 marvellosity wrote:On May 06 2016 06:17 Shapelog wrote: Kinda WIFOM tho tbh.
Theoretically, he could of also shot Kush, and prob. not even be incriminated by it. The only think a Scum!Palmar needed to worry about there is a save. i'm a terrible save because i've done nothing and my play is suspcious on its own so if i'm town and palmar is mafia i should be a very safe shot and i am by far the biggest danger to palmar getting lynched I know you are a terrible save, I was talking about Kush being saved :/ From what I know about Palmar's NK idea, it is kill whoever is on his tail. So this theory kinda does follow his kill logic from what I know. what's your point? i don't even get what you're trying to say Which line? The top was me clearing something up and the bottom is something I know about Palmar mafia habits. i know more about Palmar than anyone else so you can just take my word for anything about him. Sure! What is his favorite color? red  Woah, That is super informative!
All hail Marv!
|
I'll catch up in a couple hours, but thought I had last night.
If etelltx flips mafia this game, most likely Slam is town (or at least should get town leaned) due to that vote switch he tried to do, that would hammer Etell.
A course, basing everything off of VCA like isn't great, but it is a nice bit of info.
|
On May 06 2016 23:47 justanothertownie wrote:Why do you townread shape? +1
Especially since that I was sus. day 1 from him.
|
|
Lol, I love this btw
If I am town, and I lynch scum, then I am scum due to my meta. If I am scum, and I lynch town, then I am town due to my meta.
XD
Anyways, yeah, that is a pretty meh reason to TR me, so was what Marv was saying.
|
So what is your read on me JAT?
|
On May 07 2016 00:19 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: wait, if you're town and you lynch town, then you're town, right? According to meta? Prob. Now 3rd party, that is where it gets crazy.
|
On May 07 2016 00:21 justanothertownie wrote:Null basically. There are a few people I would kill before you (mainly Palmar/Etellex/sandro) but I see 0 reason to townread you. Come to think about it, Have you ever town read me?
|
On May 07 2016 02:03 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:ever win one of those starcraft tournaments? Kush,
Lets talk.
You and me,
Macho y Macho.
Town versus w/e the fuck you are.a
|
On May 07 2016 02:13 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:03 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 01:44 Killing wrote: August 2010 m8. I'm OG ever win one of those starcraft tournaments? I sure have. Want an autograph?
![[image loading]](http://undergrad.osu.edu/buckeyes_blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/pierce.gif) Can I get one on my big toe?
|
On May 07 2016 02:16 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:13 Shapelog wrote:On May 07 2016 02:03 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 01:44 Killing wrote: August 2010 m8. I'm OG ever win one of those starcraft tournaments? Kush, Lets talk. You and me, Macho y Macho. Town versus w/e the fuck you are.a Talk about? Your Townieness, I am still slightly sus. of you, quite honestly.
|
On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar The only interesting thing here is maybe JAT, everything else is boring.
|
On May 07 2016 02:23 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:20 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar The only interesting thing here is maybe JAT, everything else is boring. Boring and probably pretty wrong. I townread you, so you should townread me back. I think that's how it's supposed to work. Since when have I follow that logic?
Or have you forgotten OMGUS and why I am banned basically from there?
|
On May 07 2016 02:28 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:25 Shapelog wrote:On May 07 2016 02:23 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 02:20 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar The only interesting thing here is maybe JAT, everything else is boring. Boring and probably pretty wrong. I townread you, so you should townread me back. I think that's how it's supposed to work. Since when have I follow that logic? Or have you forgotten OMGUS and why I am banned basically from there? I was just kidding of course. You are welcome back anytime. Please, come back and read my weekly blog. Also, I am hosting/playing in a game that you should join. Hhmmmm
Are you done trying to semi-buddy me like you been trying to do all game?
|
On May 07 2016 02:31 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:20 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar The only interesting thing here is maybe JAT, everything else is boring. Interesting in what way? Mainly because I didn't know why. I went to his filter to see, but he already stated why.
Everyone else I can understand in some way or form. Tho, they are popular lynch pool people, hence boring.
On May 07 2016 02:32 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: if he's town i mean... scumslip. Your resume for the scum team is growning.
|
On May 07 2016 02:35 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:33 Shapelog wrote:On May 07 2016 02:28 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 02:25 Shapelog wrote:On May 07 2016 02:23 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 02:20 Shapelog wrote:On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar The only interesting thing here is maybe JAT, everything else is boring. Boring and probably pretty wrong. I townread you, so you should townread me back. I think that's how it's supposed to work. Since when have I follow that logic? Or have you forgotten OMGUS and why I am banned basically from there? I was just kidding of course. You are welcome back anytime. Please, come back and read my weekly blog. Also, I am hosting/playing in a game that you should join. Hhmmmm Are you done trying to semi-buddy me like you been trying to do all game? No. But as your buddy you have my full attention. So isn't there some question you can ask to help you figure out my alignment? Lol, so you are admitting to buddying me.
Yes there is some question, and I have been asking you. First was with the plan, which I still have questions to deal with but postgame apparently.
Anyways, Regarding to asking you one.
You have stated that: On May 06 2016 20:14 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 18:43 Palmar wrote: because I actually read some of their posts?
Btw skimmed some fazer filter and some killing filter. Fazer sounds ok, killing sounds less ok. Uh Oh. The towniness.. But never done much with it. so what made you stayed on him, after this post. Also
On May 06 2016 23:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.0
3) Fazers 4) Etellex 5) Sandroba 6) JAT 9) Palmar
On May 07 2016 00:31 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 00:23 justanothertownie wrote:On May 07 2016 00:22 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 07 2016 00:21 justanothertownie wrote:On May 07 2016 00:18 Shapelog wrote: So what is your read on me JAT? Null basically. There are a few people I would kill before you (mainly Palmar/Etellex/sandro) but I see 0 reason to townread you. does it concern you that all your scumreads are very low activity? Not really. Should it? it's like, if your scumteam consists of lynchbait, it's probably wrong, because those people look scummy even when they're town.
On May 07 2016 00:22 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 00:21 justanothertownie wrote:On May 07 2016 00:18 Shapelog wrote: So what is your read on me JAT? Null basically. There are a few people I would kill before you (mainly Palmar/Etellex/sandro) but I see 0 reason to townread you. does it concern you that all your scumreads are very low activity?
On May 07 2016 02:26 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Scumlist 2.1 changelog: removed Fazers because I liked his explanation on why he kept his vote on mig
Etellex Sandroba JAT (mostly because he plays a good scum game and he hasn't proven himself town yet) Palmar
Why do you get onto JAT for his lynch pool, when basically you have the same problem according to your own words?
|
Like 3/5 (4 if you count Palmar) of your people fit the reason with the posts towards JAT.
|
On May 07 2016 02:47 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: @shapelog. in regards to palmar, I changed my mind. Why? I realized that thinking Killing was scummy actualyl wasn't a result of insight. It was just a very obvious place to go. So it's not townie that Palmar went there.
criticizing jat for doing something I was doing: Um, well not exactly because I had JAT in my possibly scumlist, but kinda. I was trying to goad JAT into mindmelding with me but it didn't really work. I wanted him to say something like "yeah bro, but who else?!" So that push on JAT wasn't about seeing if he was scummy, rather it was about seeing if he was townie.
Alright I understand the Palmar
But why are you trying to get your scum read to think? like you, and make him do so? That doesn't make sense. You know that he/she will only think like you due to you goating them into doing so. So that doesn't make them townie needless to say. Since they are just going with the flow.
It really is impossible to use that as a metric IMO to see if someone is town.....
|
On May 07 2016 02:51 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: jat i didn't say those shouldn't be your scumreads. it was more like "do our scumreads worry you? cause they worry me" But you say that they are typically wrong, which means that you do not believe in what you are currently viewing them. But you continue on, and post another post with the list. And only remove Fazer because of something ulrealted.
which makes me think you do not even believe the thing you sent to JAT.
and you taught me, that if it seems someone won't believe his own reads, they are mafia.
Which means your mafia, by your own reasoning.
|
On May 07 2016 02:53 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2016 02:51 Shapelog wrote:On May 07 2016 02:47 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: @shapelog. in regards to palmar, I changed my mind. Why? I realized that thinking Killing was scummy actualyl wasn't a result of insight. It was just a very obvious place to go. So it's not townie that Palmar went there.
criticizing jat for doing something I was doing: Um, well not exactly because I had JAT in my possibly scumlist, but kinda. I was trying to goad JAT into mindmelding with me but it didn't really work. I wanted him to say something like "yeah bro, but who else?!" So that push on JAT wasn't about seeing if he was scummy, rather it was about seeing if he was townie.
Alright I understand the Palmar But why are you trying to get your scum read to think? like you, and make him do so? That doesn't make sense. You know that he/she will only think like you due to you goating them into doing so. So that doesn't make them townie needless to say. Since they are just going with the flow. It really is impossible to use that as a metric IMO to see if someone is town..... maybe goading is the wrong word. Maybe the angle I was pushing at there was not effective. But it should be understandable that I was trying to get inside JAT's head. And I was trying to see if it looked like the inside of my own head. Then why do you even have lynchbaiting people in your scum pool, and noone else other than JAT?
By your own logic, you should be having more than those people in there, because by your logic, they mostly will be wrong. Unless there is something I am missing.
|
|
|
|