so why did you use a question mark when you were talking about what shape said

had you genuinely forgot who it was in the 50 posts the game has? could you not have checked if you weren't sure? etc<script id="gpt-impl-0.7793814496370671" src="http://partner.googleadservices.com/gpt/pubads_impl_85.js"></script>

At first I was like damn marv's being perceptive.
And then I was like ...really though?

I would speak about what Shape said about Palmar with the same vagueness and uncertainty. Shape alluded to his last game with Palmar but included none of the specifics, as far as I remember.
So I'm kinda sus of you for making such a big deal about it.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 03 2016 22:14 GMT

#186

Let me try something.

Jat you're scummy.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 00:45 GMT

#198

lol tubesock i read my pm.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:18 GMT

#289

On May 04 2016 20:45 marvellosity wrote:
also jat is right, if you think 2 mafia buddies would connect to each other so obviously like that then you're insane, or mafia, or clueless.

stay tuned to find out which!

I think that banter was nai.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:23 GMT

#292

ahhh player list doesn't link to filters...

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:32 GMT

#297

On May 04 2016 14:53 justanothertownie wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why? Why on earth would we put on a show like that? It doesn't make any sense.
What does a supposed mafia team of marv and me gain from doing that? Explain this to me.

Of course it is an insane coincidence. That's why I found it so funny.

May I explain it?
Mafia hard it hard to interact with each other. They know each other are scummy but don't want to lynch each other.
So by forcing yourself to have a natural conversation, you are making your interactions not look like s/s.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:36 GMT

#302

On May 04 2016 21:34 justanothertownie wrote:

Show nested quote +

So naturally you would go about having a "natural" conversation by inventing some ridiculously improbable scenario. Ok kush.

You are missing Ricey's point I think. It's not the coincidence that you were there at the same time as much as the banter itself. Which felt forced and awkward to him (and annoying to me).

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:37 GMT

#303

marv, the point was that it seemed unnatural in that you tried too hard to make it seem natural.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:38 GMT

#307

um this is more of a defense of ricey than an attack on you and jat. I usually try not to make reads day 1.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:40 GMT

#310

On May 04 2016 21:39 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

i want your explanation of how it was unnatural, in detail, now

I don't remember it enough to do that. It seemed natural enough to me, not that you couldn't have a natural conversation as scum on scum.

I am more just trying to interpret what ricey said.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:45 GMT

#314

yeah he said marv waited around for jat to come back. okok
but you could have planned it out in the qt and been like "hehe let's do our little banter then if one of us flips scum the other can argue that they are town by banter connections"

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:46 GMT

#317

marv, I think that's exactly what ricey was imagining in his firt post. and in the second post he backtracked a little to say it was more about the tone of the conversation rather than the coincidence?

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:49 GMT

#321

On May 04 2016 15:00 RiceyKins wrote:
It gets way too WIFOM if I try to base everything on that JAT, and as I said you're still Null imo it just didn't look right and it's the only thing that's even worth mentioning about you so far. Although tbh you didn't seem to find it "so funny" either which is also why I found the whole thing kind of odd.

eh not exactly but whatever.
still read as inexperienced townie.

@jat. I think that qt thing is possible. And I can understand a paranoid newbie going there.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:50 GMT

#324

it wasn't backtracking I was wrong. And yes it was mostly about timing, I was wrong about that too.

still not scum though.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:53 GMT

#326

i'd bet he's an inexperienced player's smurf

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:55 GMT

#330

On May 04 2016 21:53 marvellosity wrote:
what percentage of inexperienced players do you think smurf exactly?

yes but his situation is a little different because he is both somewhat inexperienced and hasn't played in a long time. maybe.

kind of a dumb thing I backed myself into arguing about here.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 12:56 GMT

#335

On May 04 2016 01:21 RiceyKins wrote:
No big reason really. No rules against it and I'm only active on LD nowadays so wanted to keep the post count where it's at on TL lol

too weird of a reason to be a lie.

and his light suspicion of marv/jat banter is too odd/conspiracy-theory to be scummy.

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 13:08 GMT

#341

On May 04 2016 22:06 RiceyKins wrote:
Hahaha the thing is Kush is completely right. I've got like 4 games played and 2 of them were newbie games with him.

SUCK IT JAT
SUCK IT MARV

nnn_thekushmountains

1501 Posts

May 04 2016 13:12 GMT

#345

thrawn needs to get in here so we can hav a proper reuinion