EPTNot sure who I want to lynch just yet, but I'll know before I go to bed and vote that person or claim Kush sheep (eod is 7a for me).
[M][N]A Wonderful Normal Game of Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
Not sure who I want to lynch just yet, but I'll know before I go to bed and vote that person or claim Kush sheep (eod is 7a for me). | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote: Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless. Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! Why were you throwing it out there? What exactly did you throw out? He was making noise? He had lots of accusations, he had BOLD accusation(s)? All of it? He actually said his REASONS were what sounded idiotic not who he read. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 13:44 Etellex wrote: I'm familiar with casualized forms of Mafia like Town of Salem where there's a lot less reading into what people say and more logic/evidence. I've been quiet because I'm at a loss for what to go off of for suspicion. Well...guess you better start reading some of the guides that are stickied on this very forum. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 12:42 justanothertownie wrote: This could be the slowest game I ever played in. Maybe we should just lynch into the people who should but aren't posting without an excuse for it. Like Mig/thrawn/slam or the etellex guy. If I feel any better later today then I won't be around for at least 3 hours leading to the deadline since it is wednesday and therefore pubquizday. Fortunately for you people I feel like shit right now. I'd be down for Mig although he's on track for being mod killed. Dr Thrawn would be my pick of the 4 you listed. I don't think he was buddying Kush at all, but he did not produce any content and had a great chance to and it would have been pretty easy to do. Slam only because an obsolete metric I used was how much effort he placed in his fishing expeditions. When he was town he would fish till he got something. As mafia he well gave a couple casts and gave up. Kinda like here. But this is a year old at least and he constantly changes his play. Soooo....yeah. Etellex...I don't even know. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
Do you think anyone is town? It sounded like Saitama was super intense effort. Maybe there is a happy medium somewhere. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
##Vote: Etellex | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
Towns: Kush Shape Slam Marvish Ricey jat If I were to pick who to lynch of the "actives" as it were I'd take time deciding between killing and Fazer. I didnt' really like their answers but they are actually closer to null than anything. You can probably infer what I didn't like about them by some of the questions I directed at them. for the inactives I'd lynch in this orderish Dr Thrawn Etellex Mig (modkill though?) Palmar | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:08 Alakaslam wrote: Why make a list with so little info? I don't like lists in this scenario. Why open up ml opportunities for Mafia to plan around? I don't want them knowing my sentiment, and I can contribute in ways that don't inform them while informing the lot of us on specific players. Others can use this sort of contribution for PoE. However I will confirm that Etellex is not the only person I currently suspect. I posted that before I saw you're Etellex vote. I was unsure if you were actually goign to do anything. I'm happy with your last few posts. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 10:58 RiceyKins wrote: I don't think bold accusations are inherently bad Fazers, but I disagree that Killing is being bold with his claims. If one of his reasons for suspecting me is saying sorry to Marv idk I find that rather weak actually On May 04 2016 11:26 RiceyKins wrote: I think it's just that I don't find him convincing Fazers. Calls me out for being non-confrontational and then half-commits to Shape and myself by saying his theory is probably dumb and he didn't really want to go into detail. I agree with you that it's good that he's trying though but I obviously disagree with his targets  jat, so do you think Marv is town? I mean whatever you want to call it since you don't like giving away townreads. And by your disbelief should I infer you think Shape and/or Ricer is mafia? | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:04 Alakaslam wrote: Bro-fist on the seeing through homeopathic stuff "lemonade will cure your cancer!" Lol. Riiiiiiiight so my cousin's UCLA grad level research in the matter is pointless because lemons. That literally insults her work. Yet it is like my posting, I post half-ass jokes and that gets me a town pass? Isn't half the joke based on the fact that this usually happens? I have set the bar for myself so low that I can cruise through 90% of my games suspicion free. So I find we are a bit too inactive here and will probably need to start voting video people to get them to start talking. Fear of talking is a factor, but when you are already up for lunch you have nothing to lose and start talking. So let's do that. ##Vote: Etellex Get my vote off you sir. Why aren't you just lurking scum? You can't get a read; fine. But nothing at all to say? Scum is a lot scarier then town, sir, so... New or not I am inclined to actually lean scum on you. Prove me wrong. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
I don't get why it matters if he knows your reputations or not. He'd know you're both good players, maybe he doesn't know you enough to know you don't do crazy shit. You're good enough to do crazy shit though. And even then if he hasn't played in awhile then he woldn't know if you could do crazy shit or not. Why is this such a big deal? | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 20:59 marvellosity wrote: the problem is, when i have a similar feeling in response to Etellex's post (empathising, understanding how it could be the case) and yet Slam ends up voting for him while I'm leaning town. So that's 2 different results from the same response to his post. Obviously a different response doesn't have to mean scum, but it definitely merits trying to figure out what and why. I find your vote scummier than Slam's tbh. It's a weak follow. My vote is mostly because it's getting close to deadline and I'm running out of time. Since I'm going to bed pretty soon and proabbly won't wake up till 30-45 minutes before deadline I'd like to help drive some content. Since no one seems to be playing. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:07 justanothertownie wrote: Overall it is not that big of a deal but from the reads that habe been posted so far it is definitely one of the worst. Because it just doesn't check out. I don't see a town mindset or thought process behind it. Do you see a mafia one? | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:23 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: ahhh player list doesn't link to filters... scroll down a little to Rels post. He did. | ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
|
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:55 marvellosity wrote: i might rather kill tubesock though but i don't know yet Go ahead. You've wasted how many pages talking about this thing that you already said you're not gunning for Ricey. You have not scum hunted at all. The one thing you did was ask about a question mark. Even that you said you thought he was town before and after. | ||
| ||
