| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:45 Tumblewood wrote: IDK what you expected with that question, because I'm not going to come out and say, "oh I was active lurking and posting whenever I saw _____ post" no no, stop you town smuk XD do what I said in my last post | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote: We planned it in our scum QT like a couple of geniuses. you said it : D not me | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:46 gumshoe wrote: no no, stop you town smuk XD do what I said in my last post No that's pointless you do it | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
You're the one implying it. Which, btw, is dumb. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:50 Tumblewood wrote: OWS please post in exactly 15 minutes so we can sync up I wasnt talking about you ) : 1 hour ago I posted my initial question (sl, can I get a read on obi?) 17 minutes later sl and obi respond at almost the exact same time. does that really not seem weird to you? | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:50 Tumblewood wrote: OWS please post in exactly 15 minutes so we can sync up As adorable as this is, I'm not actually interested in spamming up the thread. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:50 ObiWanShinobi wrote: You're the one implying it. Which, btw, is dumb. I wasnt implying that you were doing anything clever. I think your were both hovering over the thread, both saw it around the same time, discussed what to do about it in qt, finished talking and went into thread at the same time, not realizing it would be a good idea to do so at diffrent times. That doesn't seem so crazy to me / : the alternative is you both randomely jumped into thread after 5 hours and reacted simultaneously... now THAT seems dumb. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
If he were evaluating how his posts looked about half of what he has would never see the light of day. Since he's not, town. this is really fucking rude, yes I was wrong yesterday about you, but I've admitted that and moved on. The whole onegu correlation thing was a total fuck up I agree, but that does not and should not give you the right to disregard everything I say and be a total douche even though I'm pretty much the only one sure your town right now. Also the whole fuck up only happened because you couldn't be bothered to realize that the guy who scum buddied onegu was also your top town read -_- so get off your high fucking horse and listen to me without the intention of simply ridiculing whatever I say in order to fatten up your ego. sl and obi jump in simultaneously over 20 minutes after a question that pertains to them being scum together is asked. IS THAT NOT SOMEWHAT STRANGE. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On April 19 2016 12:05 gumshoe wrote: I'm also pretty pissed at you atm tumble. this is really fucking rude, yes I was wrong yesterday about you, but I've admitted that and moved on. The whole onegu correlation thing was a total fuck up I agree, but that does not and should not give you the right to disregard everything I say and be a total douche even though I'm pretty much the only one sure your town right now. Also the whole fuck up only happened because you couldn't be bothered to realize that the guy who scum buddied onegu was also your top town read -_- so get off your high fucking horse and listen to me without the intention of simply ridiculing whatever I say in order to fatten up your ego. sl and obi jump in simultaneously over 20 minutes after a question that pertains to them being scum together is asked. IS THAT NOT SOMEWHAT STRANGE. Gumshoe, as I am aware, your town playstyle involves a lot of reading into small things, like Onegu's VT claim. A scum is more conscious of how they appear to others, and a WoT about a ten-word post is not what a scum does to make themselves look better. No it is not somewhat strange that two people posted simultaneously. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 12:09 Tumblewood wrote: Gumshoe, as I am aware, your town playstyle involves a lot of reading into small things, like Onegu's VT claim. A scum is more conscious of how they appear to others, and a WoT about a ten-word post is not what a scum does to make themselves look better. No it is not somewhat strange that two people posted simultaneously. I read into things for fun, I dont honestly believe in a lot of it. The reason I do that is because I occasionally have real break throughs (scenarios were reading into small things meant huge breakthroughs) and I am simply imitating them to chase that high. I didn't really put much stock into the onegu vt thing, I didn't even really have that much faith in my case against you after you said you fucked up your post. Though at the start of today, I had a break through superbia had scum shoot palmer so he could fake claim vig. Just wait for it, supers gonna flip scum and you wont be able to deny it. This is another revelation like that, two people responding to a question like that a significant time after it's asked but almost in synch IS a big deal. and also dont knock my style as your pretty much wrong about everyone here, you've even admitted to fucking up multiple times and you still arent willing to drop the paranoia. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On April 19 2016 11:57 gumshoe wrote: I wasnt implying that you were doing anything clever. I think your were both hovering over the thread, both saw it around the same time, discussed what to do about it in qt, finished talking and went into thread at the same time, not realizing it would be a good idea to do so at diffrent times. That doesn't seem so crazy to me / : the alternative is you both randomely jumped into thread after 5 hours and reacted simultaneously... now THAT seems dumb. It happens. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On April 19 2016 12:18 gumshoe wrote: I read into things for fun, I dont honestly believe in a lot of it. The reason I do that is because I occasionally have real break throughs (scenarios were reading into small things meant huge breakthroughs) and I am simply imitating them to chase that high. I didn't really put much stock into the onegu vt thing, I didn't even really have that much faith in my case against you after you said you fucked up your post. Though at the start of today, I had a break through superbia had scum shoot palmer so he could fake claim vig. Just wait for it, supers gonna flip scum and you wont be able to deny it. This is another revelation like that, two people responding to a question like that a significant time after it's asked but almost in synch IS a big deal. and also dont knock my style as your pretty much wrong about everyone here, you've even admitted to fucking up multiple times and you still arent willing to drop the paranoia. Is thinking Super is scum after the N1 flips a breakthrough? Because most people have been calling him scum way longer. Two people posting simultaneously is more likely noise than signal IMO. My only real read flip-flop was on jat, and the fuckups are mostly unrelated to style. I don't think I would be very effective using your style (I'm trying to look bigger-picture instead of small details). That was basically all just to refute what you said... This "argument" is pointless and we should stop. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On April 19 2016 12:26 Tumblewood wrote: Is thinking Super is scum after the N1 flips a breakthrough? Because most people have been calling him scum way longer. Two people posting simultaneously is more likely noise than signal IMO. My only real read flip-flop was on jat, and the fuckups are mostly unrelated to style. I don't think I would be very effective using your style (I'm trying to look bigger-picture instead of small details). That was basically all just to refute what you said... This "argument" is pointless and we should stop. if you dont see how scum shooting plamer to back up supers claim differs from plain super is scum, your the one not seeing the big picture. It means scum are idiots (sorry guys )  and didnt see how that plan would backfire. Which means the scum team doesnt have rels or jat on it, as they would be unlikely to let a play like that go through. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
yeah, sure it does. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
That's your prerogative. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
i'm not saying your theory is impossible. there are people like shape out there >> but if scum's doing that they're being pretty optimistic to think that someone who wouldn't obviously be vig shot over palmar would be vig shot fazers/onegu/super/maybe tw/maybe ows/maybe sl <- like all of these are more like vig shots than palmar if scum really had that as their plan i'm not sure what to say @.@ | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
Ok, I assume the vig shot fazers. Everything else would make me quite mad. Superbia claims with his first post today. jat said this right after the night shot. If he was really intending to use the palmar shot to back supers claim, why would he be one of the first people to strike down that possibility? and even if he is both those things, he clearly expected fazzers to get shot(or at least isnt suprised that he was), so why did he think this plan was any better than a straight doc claim in the first place? dont just try to be right, think about this, hard, this isnt a small detail, it's a supposed total collapse in logic. Would jat make a play that bad? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
kinda...not really...seeing the narrative here though -ducks- like if they're actually discussing how to deal with it in qt as you think they are, do you think they wouldn't go hey maybe shouldn't post at once on top of that? like why would both come out to handle it? lol | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
