|
Sl you asked me about tumble vote yesterday, I replied to you and yoy apparently dropped it, no reaction to what I've said ?
|
On April 25 2016 04:55 justanothertownie wrote:It would be much easier for you if you just accepted the obvious fact that I am town and worked from there. Let's face it - if I am mafia you aren't winning the game anyways and noone else is even putting in anay effort at all. Not to mention my interactions with super. Not to mention how every single nightkill had me as their top townread. If you want to you can waste your time tinfoiling about but if you want to win this game you shouldn't.
I really, really hope you are not mafia cause this is kinda true. Winning will be very hard if you are
|
The sl posts on me are not good find since I didn't vote to save superbia, I voted to lynch tumble. Once again, tumble and superbia were my two scumreads d1. Tumble was around before eod1. If he had been super townie, I would have been forced to vote my partner or find a shitty reason not to do that. If I was partner with superbia, I basically forced myself into a situation where if tumble is town and hadn't make a huge mistake eod1, I was in a bad situation. I would never do that in the first place.
Apart from that I agree sl is townie, but because he's playing his town meta which I know he has a hard time replicating
|
On April 25 2016 05:52 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 01:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On April 24 2016 07:12 sicklucker wrote:
My votes not final but I doubt I will change it unless I see some damned shit in tumble or jats filter which I promise to read. That or we can lynch the probably more likely scum rels with me :D SL, tell me why Rels is scum. vote analyst and doing nothing after day 1. his day one looked town but he looked town in pyp too and I wasstill right when I lynched him there
Read my fucking filter before repeating again and again I did nothing past d1
|
Sl you asked me yesterday about tumble vote. I replied to you. Did you not see it or did you ignore it ?
|
On April 25 2016 05:55 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 05:53 Rels wrote:
The sl posts on me are not good find since I didn't vote to save superbia, I voted to lynch tumble. Once again, tumble and superbia were my two scumreads d1. Tumble was around before eod1. If he had been super townie, I would have been forced to vote my partner or find a shitty reason not to do that. If I was partner with superbia, I basically forced myself into a situation where if tumble is town and hadn't make a huge mistake eod1, I was in a bad situation. I would never do that in the first place.
Apart from that I agree sl is townie, but because he's playing his town meta which I know he has a hard time replicating This doesn't convince me. Tumble arguably WAS pretty townie in the end. But you still did not vote superbia. Sure, if you are town you did vote to kill tumble and not to save superbia but we can't analyze you assuming you are town from the start.
Tumble made up a reason to explain something he said previously. You could arguee maybe that a townie could do it, but no way can you say that it is townie
|
On April 25 2016 05:55 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 03:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I even parsed SL's whole filter and still don't understand why he thinks Rels is scum.
Seems like his last scumgame tbh. ? he voted to save super day one. go reread the vote count you will get it. Among the people that day one vote favored scum super before he claimed. super just droped it at the most optrtunistic time and never changed. When rels voted tumble It was 2 votes for super 2 for tumble. Pretty suspicious dont you think?
When I voted tumble that was at the exact moment he admitted he couldn't explain with proof why he talked about a post that didn't exist. The vote count has nothing to do with it. It's in the thread
|
On April 25 2016 06:02 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 06:01 Rels wrote:On April 25 2016 05:55 justanothertownie wrote:On April 25 2016 05:53 Rels wrote:
The sl posts on me are not good find since I didn't vote to save superbia, I voted to lynch tumble. Once again, tumble and superbia were my two scumreads d1. Tumble was around before eod1. If he had been super townie, I would have been forced to vote my partner or find a shitty reason not to do that. If I was partner with superbia, I basically forced myself into a situation where if tumble is town and hadn't make a huge mistake eod1, I was in a bad situation. I would never do that in the first place.
Apart from that I agree sl is townie, but because he's playing his town meta which I know he has a hard time replicating This doesn't convince me. Tumble arguably WAS pretty townie in the end. But you still did not vote superbia. Sure, if you are town you did vote to kill tumble and not to save superbia but we can't analyze you assuming you are town from the start. Tumble made up a reason to explain something he said previously. You could arguee maybe that a townie could do it, but no way can you say that it is townie That happened like mid day. I am talking about his posting eod.
Well sl is arguing about the timing of 2-2 for my vote so it is important. And I think it was way later than mid day since i m sleeping at mid day and I don't think I voted during the first 24 hours
|
On April 25 2016 06:03 sicklucker wrote:
tumble is never going to be someone people find really townie especially day one. Hes literally lynch bait so thats a terrible argument. Its like you wanted to distance from super without putting him in danger. standard stuff
It is not since my vote was motivated by a certain event happening. Youre saying my vote was motivated by the particular votecount being 2-2. I'm saying my vote was motivated by the proof that tumble lied about something he said. Why are you dismissing that ?
|
On April 25 2016 06:05 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 06:00 Rels wrote:
Sl you asked me yesterday about tumble vote. I replied to you. Did you not see it or did you ignore it ? i saw it. it was ok but it was so late I dont really respect it
It was 15 min later
On April 24 2016 00:33 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or be super suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? GB was the second wagon when superbia fakeclaimed. Let me find the post, might take me a long time on phone :p
|
On April 25 2016 06:07 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 05:54 Rels wrote:On April 25 2016 05:52 sicklucker wrote:On April 25 2016 01:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On April 24 2016 07:12 sicklucker wrote:
My votes not final but I doubt I will change it unless I see some damned shit in tumble or jats filter which I promise to read. That or we can lynch the probably more likely scum rels with me :D SL, tell me why Rels is scum. vote analyst and doing nothing after day 1. his day one looked town but he looked town in pyp too and I wasstill right when I lynched him there Read my fucking filter before repeating again and again I did nothing past d1 what did you do? it took you 72 hours to answer my question and you were not caught up
I don't know what question you're talking about. If it was this weekend I was not available since Friday evening. Even now I'm on my phone on a train.
I did a lot more than you, especially d3 where I reread part of d1 and a lot of filters to push the game forward
|
On April 25 2016 06:12 sicklucker wrote:
Rels what im talking about is not that. im talking about when I first called you mafia becuase of your vote you didnt ever mention it
Bro you were answering MY question :p
So I will repeat it: you tried to tell me tumble and superbia s behaviour made them unlikely partners, I replied to that, what do you think of that reply ?
|
On April 25 2016 06:14 sicklucker wrote:
shut up rels your the scum here. your the one whos answering qeustions this shits not gonna fly
You can go fuck yourself until you have answered me. Your non committal stance towards tumble is pretty suspicious
|
Like you asked me a question:
On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or be super suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon?
I answered it:
On April 24 2016 00:33 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or be super suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? GB was the second wagon when superbia fakeclaimed. Let me find the post, might take me a long time on phone :p
Why are you not interested in what I had to say if you asked me directly this ?
|
On April 25 2016 06:17 sicklucker wrote:
like jat this is why rels is not town. Hes asking me dumb qeustions making me look bad and not the fucking people up for lynch
Given you're not even reading what I say to you when I'm responding to you 15 minutes after you ask something, that describes you more than me
|
On April 25 2016 06:19 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 06:17 Rels wrote:On April 25 2016 06:14 sicklucker wrote:
shut up rels your the scum here. your the one whos answering qeustions this shits not gonna fly You can go fuck yourself until you have answered me. Your non committal stance towards tumble is pretty suspicious scum killed by sicklucker 1. scum killed by rels -1. ? why do you have the balls to question me as if im a suspect here
Because I want to solve and win this game
|
On April 25 2016 06:22 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 06:20 Rels wrote:Like you asked me a question: On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or bewhaer suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? I answered it: On April 24 2016 00:33 Rels wrote:On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or be super suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? GB was the second wagon when superbia fakeclaimed. Let me find the post, might take me a long time on phone :p Why are you not interested in what I had to say if you asked me directly this ? I planned to go read it so im ignoring it.. happy?
So now that you've read it (see my filter, the next post after the one quoted here for the "GB was the second wagon" thing), what do you think about tit ? Do you still think "superbia claiming with tumble as second wagon" is still true ?
|
This is the post in question
On April 22 2016 00:54 Rels wrote:Leaving work soon, will be on my phone all evening so no big post but I'll be around to react. I'm OK with Tumble / Onegu / JAS. Tumble is waaaay more likely to be scum though. The thing gumshoe bought up about Superbia & him being suicidal D1 doesn't apply for a few reasons: 1. Superbia was RB. Scum's #1 priority is to let him live. Superbia claiming to live over Tumble makes sense. 2. Tumble NEVER voted Superbia, even though he was "scumreading" him, to save his life; but he voted GB, who he had no real opinion on. 3. Reason 1 is true, but it's not even what happened. Here is the sequence of events: Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:48 justanothertownie wrote:
Might just vote GB on principle though. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:48 Palmar wrote:
jat who is mafia? I'll sheep you if you're at all confident in anything. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:50 justanothertownie wrote:On April 17 2016 06:48 Palmar wrote:
jat who is mafia? I'll sheep you if you're at all confident in anything. Not really. Too many people who are just not invested in this game. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:53 justanothertownie wrote:
I am sick and tired of having to decide day1 lynches. Voted GB, do what you want. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:54 Palmar wrote:
fuck it, I'm staying course on superbia. His rsoultin/gb read post was completely non-sensical, he's taking a lot of weird stances based on literal things without trying to diagnose what may be behind it (look at his thing about fazer. Unless fazer is a good/experienced player it's unlikely he'd admit to just sheeping people as mafia).
I think it's a good lynch. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:54 Palmar wrote:
his case on me was also terrible.
I encourage people to sheep me on superbia. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:55 Superbia wrote:
I can't make it any clearer than this right now. DO NOT LYNCH ME. Show nested quote +On April 17 2016 06:55 justanothertownie wrote:On April 17 2016 06:54 Palmar wrote:
his case on me was also terrible.
I encourage people to sheep me on superbia. Maybe I will. During the minutes before Superbia's fakeclaim, it was quite evident that the fight evolved into Superbia vs GB, not Superbia vs Tumble. So he didn't killed Tumble by claiming, like gumshoe said. Actually it is the opposite. He didn't fakeclaim as long it was a "Tumble vs Superbia" fight, but as soon as it was "GB vs Superbia", he fakeclaimed.
|
On April 25 2016 06:26 sicklucker wrote:
but do you guys wanna know a good reason why onegus mafia to me right now? because only one person seems willing to join his wagon right now. If theres two mafia I expect 3 votes on onegu.
This is pretty true. Onegu has been pretty shit and is an easy mislynch if he is not scum.
|
On April 25 2016 06:27 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2016 06:24 Rels wrote:On April 25 2016 06:22 sicklucker wrote:On April 25 2016 06:20 Rels wrote:Like you asked me a question: On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or bewhaer suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? I answered it: On April 24 2016 00:33 Rels wrote:On April 24 2016 00:15 sicklucker wrote:On April 23 2016 22:58 Rels wrote:On April 23 2016 22:37 sicklucker wrote:
your the vote analyst guy. do you not find your day 1 vote damning? because I do Not really, especially since I only voted tumble after he slipped about a post that didn't exist. If I was superbia s partner I would have been forced to vote him or be super suspicious not voting him since he was one of my main scumread and in that situation I couldn't plan for tumble to make a mistake like that. And if you're going the vote route, how do you find tumble not voting superbia to survive ? how do you find superbia fake claiming with tumble as second wagon? GB was the second wagon when superbia fakeclaimed. Let me find the post, might take me a long time on phone :p Why are you not interested in what I had to say if you asked me directly this ? I planned to go read it so im ignoring it.. happy? So now that you've read it (see my filter, the next post after the one quoted here for the "GB was the second wagon" thing), what do you think about tit ? Do you still think "superbia claiming with tumble as second wagon" is still true ? im not trusting you over a confirmed town man... So no im not talking about it right now. but even if tumble was a close third wagon its still a pretty bad thing for super to do
Motherfucker I do not want you to say "gumshoe is right" or "Rels is right", I want you to read eod1, or at least my post, on it and gumshoe s, and tell what you think. I don't understand why you think you are picking sides here. Stop deferring your opinion to others and say your own
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
