New Smurf Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
![]() | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
I'm thinking scum | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 08:41 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: You are thinking I'm scum? Why's that? Town objective: Find scum Your objective: Find smurf identities | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Yeah, I'm the one fabricating reads, right? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
The real scumstrat, however, would be padding your filter with what basically boils down to setup discussion since people aren't allowed to confirmw hether you're correct on them. What is the town-favoured strat to outing smurfs, though? That's something I can't figure out, not like you can use meta without a seed of doubt since you can't ever confirm you're correct. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 10:57 keanuisgod wrote: Okay, the bubblegum is gone (srs), so let's get to it! ![]() I can see trying to out smurfs as a "Palmar-like" plan. After all, meta analysis is a (useful) tool town uses pretty often, and to do that you need to know who you are talking to. For example, if you can figure out an inactive lurker is actually a vet, you'd likely change your stance on him, comparing to you not knowing who he is. These kind of plans aren't usually "scummy" nor "townie" (though there are some exceptions); they just are, specially in games with special characteristics that allow these kind of plans to emerge (like themed games) Though I guess it kind of fights against the fun of this kind of game (i.e nobody knowing each other at all throughout all game, allowing shenanigans to happen). Anyways, this seems like usual D1 shitfest OMGUSing, which is pretty neutral shit (i.e not scummy nor townie). Of course, in a game where everyone is allowed to out their smurf it would be the best play to find smurf identities but then it would also be the best play to just claim who you really are rendering the theme of the game pointless. What triple N is doing causes doubt since none of the meta can be fully confirmed | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Also, saying that I have useless posts in no way invalidates my argument that you're padding your filter. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 11:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Was there a reason for you saying hi and posting an emoticon? No? Then why do you assume there was a reason for me smurf hunting? Why don't you tell me. Is there any reason for smurf hunting very early game that isn't padding my filter? Not in this game, no | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Zzz emoticon: "Post more because this is the time where I can be active" | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 12:39 Bhaal LoM wrote: Mortals it not a good idea to smurf hunt. It just waste people's time. insightful wow cool nobody said that yet | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 19:47 unholyflare wrote: I don't understand how you or anyone can believe this. If, somehow, we know the identities of all/most of the people in the game, it would be easier to scumhunt. I think you're pretty suspicious for this as it suggests you have something to hide. I'm checking the thread before I go to bed but one more time, we can't know the identities of anyone for sure it only creates wifom | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Wartrukk For some people we can be close to 100% sure of their identity. For instance, I am close to 100% sure that keanuisgod is shapelog. Even if you disagree, wouldn't the obvious identity of a smurf be helpful for some rough but effective metaing? ie if keanu aka shapelog has a huge filter, that doesn't necessarily point to him being town. I didn't realize you were actually tunneled on me for smurf hunting. Exactly how sure were you that I was scum? I guess if meta reads are all you are confident in making then a 99% smurf read is fine I just don't think it's 100% even if you truly believe you are the smurf detective. I used the word tunneled because I was tunneled on the idea that smurf huntingis super scummy and since you seemed, in my eyes, to be fighting me for no real reason. I'm over the smurf thing now. Bhaal lom is still in my leanscum pile, NNN is null because i admit he posted some stuff (like early game to saitama) that I was thinking. Vald is coming out of the gate strong andI think that's towny, especially if he replaced in on short notice. Saitama had a weird early game and I had him as leanscum last night but I haven't read too closely the 30 or so posts from last night. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 11 2016 03:54 saitamaofonepunch wrote: this is not an Omgus, but in skimming it can look like it. Under careful reading, I like it- this is an excellent point. IF wartrukk had voted you. Nonetheless the point remains good. Can you elaborate on this post? Whose point is good? Yours or his? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 11 2016 23:24 Valdiano wrote: another point that I feel needs some clarification - this sounds like mindmeld to me, which people from their perspective, view as towny, so why is he still null? just wondering. also if you can further discuss saita, that might be great. he's the one active player I'm having difficulty understanding. You're honestly correct, we had a mindmeld on saitama's earlygame awkwardness but I was too stubborn to call it as such. nnn has been active in thread and looking towny since I last checked and read him pretty strongly as town now. Saitama is looking scummy to me still but at the time of that post it was only due to his awkwardness early game. I've gone through his filter (thanks to this question) and noticed a few things. He says that he finds NNN and myself null and, when called out on the fact that he said we were doing towny things, backed it up saying there isn't enough to go on. Then, after a while says we're both leaning town. Maybe nnn did some stuff but I've been AFK for 24hrs or something, what did I do that made me townlean? + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2016 02:58 saitamaofonepunch wrote: Coming into the thread early and saying "I'm town" also comes from town more often than scum. Do you seriously expect me to immediately give them a town lean? Please. I weigh my reads before I give them. And I took it on someone's word that wartrukk was omgusing you- so lynch me for not reading. Finally, you did specifically state at one time "you are scumreading me for X? Then you are scum" which is practically omgus. I will find it later. On phone. On February 11 2016 08:59 saitamaofonepunch wrote: Bhaal has quit role playing. Looking forward to the future on that. Wartrukk is still mostly null. I haven't formed strong reads yet. I will say kush mountain and wartrukk are slight townleans after more thought put into this game. The motive behind their posting does not look destructive to me at this time. It just feels like saitama is following thread sentiment. He calls out keanu for voting a scumread he's not confident in but once someone points out that voting is part of mafia saitama calls the subject of keanu's case (halo lamb) scummy. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Halo lamb types a lot like LS, to contradict my early game and smurfhunt | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 12 2016 10:03 keanuisgod wrote: It's really nice to come back to activity 1-2 hours before the lynch and shout how the "wagon looks like trash" isn't it? It's also really nice to vote right at the last moment to someone who is OBVIOUSLY not getting lynched and making no effort to try to get him lynched It also isn't suspicious at all to vote someone completely unrelated to the lynch and wait until the last second (when you KNOW your vote doesn't count and thus you can't be held accountable for anything) by just saying "I have real reasons but am still busy" Anyways, we know Bhaal is town now, so please explain your read on him. These are your only posts about him Why exactly was he in your "leanscum" pile? What does the "lying LS" thing have to do with anything? Did you even pay attention to my case on him and the later change of heart of many people in the thread about him? lol nice omgus this is funny. No I didn't read the case nor anyone's changes of heart | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
I didn't really care about this game before and now I REALLY don't care | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 12 2016 15:10 keanuisgod wrote: ... how can it be OMGUS if you never accused me of anything ... ![]() wait what I thought saitama posted the other thing oh well | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 06:41 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: did youread what i wrote even... my entire case is pretty much assuming he's nocturnemage. No I did not, I'll go look for it | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 08:07 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: implicates wartrukk ![]() | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
In MYLO. HHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 09:20 keanuisgod wrote: Well, he hasn't put his vote on Valdi after straight up calling him scum so I think we know where this is going Yeah but I want more stuff to read now | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 12 2016 10:03 keanuisgod wrote: It's really nice to come back to activity 1-2 hours before the lynch and shout how the "wagon looks like trash" isn't it? It's also really nice to vote right at the last moment to someone who is OBVIOUSLY not getting lynched and making no effort to try to get him lynched It also isn't suspicious at all to vote someone completely unrelated to the lynch and wait until the last second (when you KNOW your vote doesn't count and thus you can't be held accountable for anything) by just saying "I have real reasons but am still busy" Anyways, we know Bhaal is town now, so please explain your read on him. These are your only posts about him Why exactly was he in your "leanscum" pile? What does the "lying LS" thing have to do with anything? Did you even pay attention to my case on him and the later change of heart of many people in the thread about him? leanscum for roleplaying and parroting what wa already said in the earlygame. lying LS means I was so sure it was LS and that he was lying which is, IMO pretty scummy. I did not pay attention to any of those things at that time. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 11:55 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: I think garg is more likely the second scum. Maybe this is a little nitpicky but the way you word this is makes me think you believe vald is scum and that the second scum could be either robik or garg with garg as a more likely scenario. If this is what you mean, why would robik be on the table at all? He's busing this hard for the cred in mylo just to set up a mislynch later on keanu? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 23:07 GargamelxD wrote: the nk does implicate wartrukk, saitama wasnt really the shining beacon of townieness to warrant being NKd, so i suppose it was cause of his reads.. valdiano is hts and town imo. On February 13 2016 23:10 GargamelxD wrote: incompatibility detected On February 14 2016 00:22 GargamelxD wrote: Wartrukk also didnt comment on any of the reasons for why people went for the rom lynch. why are you failing to notice this nnn? theres the feeling you are biased towards wartrukk So if this isn't omgus with dumb reasons to back it up i don't know what is | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Regarding robik, he just came into the game so it'd be hard to gauge alignment just on a couple of posts. However, I'm getting strong suspicions on him being scum. His demeanor sticks out in a weird manner, since he JUST came into the game and is acting like he solved everything and he caught the scumteam and has NO doubts whatsoever about anything .... when it's MYLO. I'd presume he'd be MORE confused than us in this game since he missed D1 and a lot of stuff, not that he'd be more confident than ANY of us. Also, if I assume he's town the way he made his reads feels weird. Like, Garga and Warty seem "likely town so I'll leave them alone" (which to be honest is somewhat what I did with the "Standby" pile up there). So from his POV the ONLY thing left is accuse me of being scum (assuming NNN is town and scum have no way of believably go against him). His case is bad, the way he approached his read on me is weird too. It feels like the only reason he's FOSing me is because of PoE, not because he thinks I'm scum in an independent manner. From my POV, if Garga and Warty are still in that Standby(me)/Likely town(robik) pile, then it doesn't make sense for robik to go after me with such conviction instead of taking a step back and figure out if his actual (admitted by him as not strong) reads on Garga and Warty. This makes perfect sense if he's scum and found some "scummy" posts of mine to scapegoat while not wanting to go against the flow and accuse someone of Garga/Warty. If he's scum with Valdi then Gargy/Warty/me(obs) are all town so he HAS to pick one to scapegoat, and apparently I have the scummiest posts. He could also be scum with one of Gargy/Warty so in that case he'd obviously have some agenda (not to push his buddy for instance). Also I had my (very small) suspicions of unholy back on D1 (which I think I already posted), so it doesn't feel out of place for robik to be scum (considering unholy). I did notice he gave me my well deserved townread when nobody else did, but it's weird that you say he could be with valdi but that would imply you are the scummiest of the reest of the townies. This is incorrect, going for the low hanging fruit is often called out on TL from what I see. Yeah, fuck, I'll read robik's filter brb | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 13 2016 09:14 Iwasrobik wrote: I had a townread on him for some reason reading the thread. Let's see why. I first had a scumread for this post. Oh yeah, he was one of the first to take a firm stance for the lynch. Town points. Not scumreading me when I was an easy ML. + Having strong opinions in his few posts. Not confirmed town but likely IMO. Oh yeah I remember thinking this made sense at the time but this is actually such a bullshit reason. "Having strong opinions" and "taking a firm stance" but these things are backed up by nothing in garg's filter, it's like robik just grabbed a couple posts that sound good and called garg town. + Show Spoiler + also "Not confirmed town but likely IMO." Is some weird language to use for some random posts | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:36 keanuisgod wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/502905-new-smurf-mini-mafia?user=Wartrukk You were very active and "cared" about the thread and read it in the first 12 hours of the game or so. Ever since late-D1 you've been "I don't give a shit about the thread" and "I am not reading the thread". If you are town, this surely has an explanation right? You don't go from being active and engaging with the thread to becoming whatever the heck you've become so far. Right, first 12 hours I was here at deadline and having a fun time. Next morning I'm swamped with work and can only manage a few phone posts except the couple hopurs I was on the PC. What am I going to do when I have very little downtime? a) read filters or b)play videogames. + Show Spoiler + it's b | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:41 keanuisgod wrote: Why don't you care about the game? Work just means less time, but well, even Valdi managed to post some walls of text with stuff and we all know how much "time" apparently he has (i.e NONE) Very few posts to read, MYLO on day 2, feels like a shittily balanced game but I don't know what the standard for small games is | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:42 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Chill Keanu lol It's better to have it all on the table for later if we don't get fucked here | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:44 keanuisgod wrote: Right now the only 2 realistic lynches are Valdiano (if Warty swaps) or Warty (if me/robik/NNN, who seem active in the thread, swap). To be honest I'm somewhat considering a Warty lynch right now, though it may be a little too late. Warty just doesn't give a fuck about the game too much. He's too up-front with it. Would a townie act like this? Response to everything with "I don't want to read the thread" but still randomly appear right before the deadline? If he cares enough to show up now, why not care enough to read filters that are 2 pages long (seriously, this game is VERY SMALL) and try to do some meaningful shit? Well, if anything this game has made me realize that meta is more important than I thought. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:51 keanuisgod wrote: What do you think Valdi will flip right now? Tell us ALL your thoughts about Valdi, before he flips and this will be invalid Off the top of my head 'he posted a few times day 1 and I liked the posts at the time' I'll have a gander at his filter if you want but if you think I'm scum I don't see the point since I would just use TMI and make a case calling him his true alignment | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:55 Iwasrobik wrote: Don't remember doing this already ? Never did it | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
So I'm here trying to figure out if robik or keanu is the scum trying to get the easy warty mislynch out of the way first. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 14:21 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Something I don't get about warty: He lists there being very few posts as something that leads to him not caring about the game. But for someone who can't be arsed, aren't small filters much better than long filters? Answered that one already | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
I said that I'd rather play video games than read 2-page filters NNN I can find it if you like one sec | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 15 2016 07:38 Wartrukk wrote: Right, first 12 hours I was here at deadline and having a fun time. Next morning I'm swamped with work and can only manage a few phone posts except the couple hopurs I was on the PC. What am I going to do when I have very little downtime? a) read filters or b)play videogames. + Show Spoiler + it's b | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:24 Iwasrobik wrote: Why did you say "I'll buy that. Valdiano kinda won me over when he was posting because it was content for me to read." if you didn't read his filter ? What do you mean? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:34 Iwasrobik wrote: So you posted "I will read valdiano's filter since he's getting a lot of flak". Then you DIDNT READ his filter and waited 11 minutes doing NOTHING. Then you posted "I'll buy that. Valdiano kinda won me over when he was posting because it was content for me to read." ????????????????????? lol doing nothing I was probably watching streams or playing games but yeah essentially | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:35 Iwasrobik wrote: Liar. Scum. >Is completely honest about everything >Called a liar whatever | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:35 Iwasrobik wrote: It doesn't make sense EVER and you're only posting this because you affirmed earlier you didn't read his filter: So if it doesn't matter what I answered what are you trying to prove? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:37 Iwasrobik wrote: This does not make sense. It CANNOT happen. There is NO explanation I can imagine for why you would go "I'll read Vlad's filter", NOT doing it, then go "OK I agree with the case Vlad can be scum". Laziness, low attention span, lack of motivation.... I came up with three off the top of my head | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:38 Iwasrobik wrote: I was waiting for "Oh this post right there was a mistake I actually read his filter but forgot" if you were town. ![]() Which would make me a liar Which is why you're calling me scum k | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:40 Iwasrobik wrote: Doesn't explain why you go from "I'll read his filter" to "I'll buy the case" if you did NOTHING in between but play video games. Hm, to me it does. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:41 Iwasrobik wrote: Yep but that would be believable. Your version is "I changed my read when I did nothing that would warrant changing it", which doesn't make sense unless you don't care about your read. 'changed my read' meaning 'had town feels because the posts were big but read a case and decided to sheep' then yeah I guess I did | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:42 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: @wartrukk. usually people complain when filters are too long. It takes a lot of time to read them. You are saying you are having trouble caring because filters are too short. Don't short filters make the game easier to follow than long filters? I never said that, I said the low volume of posting is making it hard to care. I like seeing the little ()> filled with numbers when I check my subscribed threads. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:48 Iwasrobik wrote: Meh you're scum. I owe the game a reread though, didn't have time so I will have to do that before doing anything tomorrow, assuming I don't die. Will wait for night result then sleep. meh, thread sentiment is going your way so you don't need to throw any more shit that won't stick. I hear you | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 16 2016 07:53 Iwasrobik wrote: fuck you I created the thread sentiment you motherfucker Hahahaha ok bud pretty sure it was my superb townplay that got thread sentiment on your side | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
inb4 I'm just agreeing with whoever is talking at the time | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On January 27 2016 06:46 Onegu wrote: This is a open set up. The set up is as follows. Doctor may save himself but may not target the same person on consecutive nights. 1 Doctor, 6 Vanilla town, 1 Mafia Rolecop, 1 Mafia Goon nvm | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
nnn was the only one calling me town until a short time before deadline. The only one who wasn't here before deadline is garga. That's all I really got but it makes sense to me | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
I'll be back throughout the dayphase. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Got a speeding ticket last night. First one ever. I was going with the flow of traffic but hey who cares | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 17 2016 08:30 Iwasrobik wrote: Garga is the last scum and here is why. The main reason: Vlad's interactions Here is the ONLY mention of Garga in Vald's filter: Once, he's mentioned because it's a post about lurkers; and it's a slight townlean without explanations, which is partner indicative. In comparaison, here is how Vlad' interactions with Kaenu makes Kaenu likely town: + Show Spoiler + Questions / interactions with him On February 11 2016 01:14 Valdiano wrote: so there's a few things I don't like about this reading your filter or that I don't understand. You are discussing the effects of nnn's scumhunting in this first quote but you are dismissing it as banter. what makes you think this presumably isn't alignment indicative? And Wartruk: + Show Spoiler + Questions / interactions with him On February 11 2016 23:24 Valdiano wrote: another point that I feel needs some clarification - this sounds like mindmeld to me, which people from their perspective, view as towny, so why is he still null? just wondering. also if you can further discuss saita, that might be great. he's the one active player I'm having difficulty understanding. Scumread with reasonning on him On February 11 2016 00:54 Valdiano wrote: wartrokk - didn't like his opening post because the usa vs europe thing is obviously not scummy. his filer padding post, without knowing who he is, I think I know what he actually meant by that, but obv not going to put words in his mouth. (if it's what I think he meant, it's nai) The gist of his post is that he's skeptical and whoever the player is, it is possible this person just doesn't metaread people, he's in the clear as long as he's not scumreading someone for something that isn't alignment indicative. if wartrokk can explain why the way nnn is smurf hunting is scummy then I would feel a little better about his alignment. his final post didn't reach an absolute conclusion on nnn despite their ongoing conversation. regardless of who he was, he should have been able to do so. right now, it's a scumlean without a concrete conclusion And Saitama: + Show Spoiler + Questions / interactions with him On February 11 2016 01:02 Valdiano wrote: this post is difficult to understand. if I understand it correctly this is a bad post. if this is the definition you believe then why are you sure that this couldn't come from scum? omgus can come from either alignment. second if you are suggesting the play is more often town then why are you suggesting that they have not progressed from null? what is the conditional element that could make them scum (implied by your first sentence in the final quote, correct)? Plus a scumread on him which you probably all remember, I'm tired of writing these spoilers. Even unholyflare got a small reason for his read: + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2016 23:31 Valdiano wrote: if I had to lynch any of the severely low content posters for uselessness right now, I'd say that 77Gold would "win" over unholyflare, if only for unholyflare making that one slight observation. Vlad's interactions with others makes Wartruk and Kaenu very unlikely partners, and Garga a likely partner. The secondary reasons 1. The activity and lack of excuse for AFK Garga's activity is indicative of scum; no posts during long stretches of time where scum has no interest posting. He has 1 post N1 and 2 posts N2, and nights are periods where scum doesn't feel the need to post. Furthermore, these AFK periods are not explained. This is scum indicative, as townie are waaaaay more likely to explain WHY they weren't there for some time than scum, like Wartruk did for example. Again, that seems dumb but it is true. It was true for Vlad, it is true for Garga. Lastly, he seems to have given up right now, which is a scum indicator, especially right after a scum lynch. 2. No interest in the lynch Garga and Vlad were the two players not posting the hour before deadline on both D1 and D2. Gold did it too but he clearly gave up the game, and probably would have been replaced if not lynched. If Wartruk was not around the D2 deadline, we would not even have been able to lynch Vlad. 3. His read on Vlad That's it. No comment on any of the two cases made on him. So who is the last scum ? Garga I would add the mindless shit flinging toward me where he doesn't even know what he's calling me scum for before he posts On February 14 2016 00:13 GargamelxD wrote: he also said the rom wagon looked like shit, was that after his flip`? which was posted after he posts this: On February 13 2016 23:10 GargamelxD wrote: incompatibility detected Which means he read my filter but never looked at any posts in context. He obviously didn't read the end of day in order either. He was looking for reasons to scumread me before he read the thread. | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 18 2016 03:45 GargamelxD wrote: yours is already pretty deep too so enjoy the 50 percent chance of winning when the night is over what does this even mean? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Ok | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 18 2016 15:23 keanuisgod wrote: The 8 planets are playing a game of mafia at this very moment. 5 are townies, 3 scum. Which ones are which? Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are townies and the rest scum. Why? Because they have the same alignment best one imo | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 19 2016 08:08 Iwasrobik wrote: Lol so you shot kaenu, if you shot me you would have conceded How do you figure? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Seems like a slow-roll though why not just put KP on me? There's like 0% you were saving me right? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 19 2016 08:20 keanuisgod wrote: If you got them out, I'd find that suspicious. I am the only one on town's side who can take out bullets, and I don't remember taking out yours. This either means you are scum, and one of your scumbuddies has first-aid training, or you drugged me some night and forced me to operate on you without my knowledge. Did you roofie me? Wait which drink did you have again? I thought my nod was lacklustre | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 19 2016 08:46 keanuisgod wrote: I actually used "random.org" to choose between the 3 of us at the same time with equal probability. Had no clue who was scum or not, so there would have been a 33% I'd have targetted you 'swhat I would have done | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Guess you guys have to step your games up | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 21 2016 07:50 keanuisgod wrote: I have banana jelly in my fridge. How would banana jelly with banana bread taste like? And if you sandwich a real banana in between? Hm, the bread also has chocolate chips in it so I can imagine that combo would be amazing | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
##vote keanu | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
![]() | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
![]() | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 21 2016 08:02 Iwasrobik wrote: We can tlak right ? Game is over one way or another anyway now theoretically If we all get modkilled does it end in a draw? | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 21 2016 08:02 Tubesock wrote: Stop posting, I guess? ![]() | ||
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
| ||