EPTNew Smurf Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
 | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
I'm thinking scum | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 08:41 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: You are thinking I'm scum? Why's that? Town objective: Find scum Your objective: Find smurf identities | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Yeah, I'm the one fabricating reads, right? | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
The real scumstrat, however, would be padding your filter with what basically boils down to setup discussion since people aren't allowed to confirmw hether you're correct on them. What is the town-favoured strat to outing smurfs, though? That's something I can't figure out, not like you can use meta without a seed of doubt since you can't ever confirm you're correct. | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 10:57 keanuisgod wrote: Okay, the bubblegum is gone (srs), so let's get to it!  I can see trying to out smurfs as a "Palmar-like" plan. After all, meta analysis is a (useful) tool town uses pretty often, and to do that you need to know who you are talking to. For example, if you can figure out an inactive lurker is actually a vet, you'd likely change your stance on him, comparing to you not knowing who he is. These kind of plans aren't usually "scummy" nor "townie" (though there are some exceptions); they just are, specially in games with special characteristics that allow these kind of plans to emerge (like themed games) Though I guess it kind of fights against the fun of this kind of game (i.e nobody knowing each other at all throughout all game, allowing shenanigans to happen). Anyways, this seems like usual D1 shitfest OMGUSing, which is pretty neutral shit (i.e not scummy nor townie). Of course, in a game where everyone is allowed to out their smurf it would be the best play to find smurf identities but then it would also be the best play to just claim who you really are rendering the theme of the game pointless. What triple N is doing causes doubt since none of the meta can be fully confirmed | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Also, saying that I have useless posts in no way invalidates my argument that you're padding your filter. | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 11:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Was there a reason for you saying hi and posting an emoticon? No? Then why do you assume there was a reason for me smurf hunting? Why don't you tell me. Is there any reason for smurf hunting very early game that isn't padding my filter? Not in this game, no | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Zzz emoticon: "Post more because this is the time where I can be active" | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 12:39 Bhaal LoM wrote: Mortals it not a good idea to smurf hunt. It just waste people's time. insightful wow cool nobody said that yet | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 10 2016 19:47 unholyflare wrote: I don't understand how you or anyone can believe this. If, somehow, we know the identities of all/most of the people in the game, it would be easier to scumhunt. I think you're pretty suspicious for this as it suggests you have something to hide. I'm checking the thread before I go to bed but one more time, we can't know the identities of anyone for sure it only creates wifom | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
Wartrukk For some people we can be close to 100% sure of their identity. For instance, I am close to 100% sure that keanuisgod is shapelog. Even if you disagree, wouldn't the obvious identity of a smurf be helpful for some rough but effective metaing? ie if keanu aka shapelog has a huge filter, that doesn't necessarily point to him being town. I didn't realize you were actually tunneled on me for smurf hunting. Exactly how sure were you that I was scum? I guess if meta reads are all you are confident in making then a 99% smurf read is fine I just don't think it's 100% even if you truly believe you are the smurf detective. I used the word tunneled because I was tunneled on the idea that smurf huntingis super scummy and since you seemed, in my eyes, to be fighting me for no real reason. I'm over the smurf thing now. Bhaal lom is still in my leanscum pile, NNN is null because i admit he posted some stuff (like early game to saitama) that I was thinking. Vald is coming out of the gate strong andI think that's towny, especially if he replaced in on short notice. Saitama had a weird early game and I had him as leanscum last night but I haven't read too closely the 30 or so posts from last night. | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
On February 11 2016 03:54 saitamaofonepunch wrote: this is not an Omgus, but in skimming it can look like it. Under careful reading, I like it- this is an excellent point. IF wartrukk had voted you. Nonetheless the point remains good. Can you elaborate on this post? Whose point is good? Yours or his? | ||
|
Wartrukk
152 Posts
| ||
| ||
