EPTPick Your Power: Intriguing - Page 51
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:41 sicklucker wrote: a mistake mafia probably cant make because of the scum qt. oh wait you already scum slipped that mafia cant put there numbers in that. thanks for that lol the scumslip would have been that mafia COULDNT have put their numbers in the QT. So yep dumb again. Actually going to bed now. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:41 Superbia wrote: Good. You are 100% Spybotting n1 then. This also frames everyone so alignments will be inversed (I believe). yep yep, I'll also claim during the night if I do choose to frame and then I'll show up on any watchers and stuff (I'm assuming I visit every player) to confirm no tomfoolery. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:41 Superbia wrote: Good. You are 100% Spybotting n1 then. This also frames everyone so alignments will be inversed (I believe). Moreover I'm not sold on giving Breshke the Watson role. There's more than enough bullshit roles that can invert alignments or targets (dr sy n tist being one of them) so blame can always be shifted. Regardless of breshke's actual alignment. Watson needs to be 99% reliable. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:05 Palmar wrote: I'll sit down later tonight and figure it out. Make it fast because I hope I can go to bed really early tonight. I seriously need +8 hours of sleep. Preferable 10. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
Yet somehow you claim im mafia because I tried to put my number in my qt? rofl ya ok bud | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:44 kitaman27 wrote: yep yep, I'll also claim during the night if I do choose to frame and then I'll show up on any watchers and stuff (I'm assuming I visit every player) to confirm no tomfoolery. I don't think it's a choice. It's part of the action. You'll frame everyone. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 20 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote: Yo real quick before I get back to work: Gambler is the most hilarious badass role ever that we need to have in the game. Here's the plan: 1. Give gambler to some midling town-lean like kita/obi or maybe keir. 2. We pick a list of 2-3 possible mafia/lurk/bad-town that are not primary lynch candidates for d1 (like Vivax/Alot/Breshke or something, lots to pick from tbh). 2.5) Gambler RNGs a target within this list. 3. We will force these 2 or 3 to vote outside of the primary wagons. 4. The entire list is forced to either: a) Play good town (if they're town) or b) Bus their partners (if they're mafia) due to how the role works (if they vote for mafia they live and we know who was mafia after gambler claims their target, or they die). | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:45 Superbia wrote: I don't think it's a choice. It's part of the action. You'll frame everyone. Yeah, I mean assuming I do indeed to with spybot as planned, which is like a 95% probability at this point. | ||
|
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:39 disformation wrote: Nah, town looking for scum. I'll be honest: inactivity is a bit of a turn-off for me. TBH was a bit turned-off that you didn't claim which number you picked, hence the uncooperative bit, but it seems like you didn't even picked one... so nvm for now. voting thread So being #13 I don't really want to pick something that might be taken. Could go traditional doc or JK. I just hope I don't get weak cop. around 33% or 38% of dying N1, depending on whether we lynch scum D1 seems a bit harsh. :/ EBWOP: totally meant weak doc at the end not weak cop. xD Need more coffee. xD On January 20 2016 23:41 kitaman27 wrote: I'd rather you picked doc than JK to be honest. Eh. JK might be a bit iffy in the beginning where I want to use it protectively and end up rb-ing the good townsfolk which is a bit awkward since everyone should have quite good roles and actions they want to do this game... So I get where you are coming from. Will take a quick look at the list soon(TM) to see if there is something else, but probably going doc and hoping I get the normal/sane/whatever one sounds like a plan. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
This seems solid. For number three, I think it is important that we tell them exactly who to pick. If we leave it up to them then they can pick a townie of their choice to kill and try to justify it. Since those 2-3 players don't know if they were actually targeted, they can't move their vote off a mafia at end of day if they know they're caught. Another option we have is to force the strongest scum suspect to be the gambler. If town feels that the gambler is still mafia by the end of day one, we force the gambler target to vote for the gambler, killing them both. Otherwise, we pick the target for the gambler voter. If either player refuses to follow through, we policy lynch since the final vote count will show the +0 and +2. I think I kinda like my version better. Thoughts? | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
=D | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
On January 20 2016 23:51 kitaman27 wrote: This seems solid. For number three, I think it is important that we tell them exactly who to pick. If we leave it up to them then they can pick a townie of their choice to kill and try to justify it. Since those 2-3 players don't know if they were actually targeted, they can't move their vote off a mafia at end of day if they know they're caught. Another option we have is to force the strongest scum suspect to be the gambler. If town feels that the gambler is still mafia by the end of day one, we force the gambler target to vote for the gambler, killing them both. Otherwise, we pick the target for the gambler voter. If either player refuses to follow through, we policy lynch since the final vote count will show the +0 and +2. I think I kinda like my version better. Thoughts? I actually love your version. That's even better. It also leaves the roles open of townie-esque people to pick more powerful stuff. 100% on board. | ||
|
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 16:40 Palmar wrote: This is a terrible post because the three names he mentions are basically drawn out of a fucking hat. There's a ton of people I have no faith Kita has strong opinions on simply because they haven't been around. Do you disagree with any of those three or are you just calling it terrible for the sake of calling things terrible? The difference between an afk player and those three is that I feel they actually have displayed things that I have found objectively scummy, mainly their complacency with the thread. Is it a strong opinion? No I rarely give those so early, but it's what I'm thinking at the moment nevertheless. | ||
| ||
