|
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta. its bad to go off of meta. It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion. Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart. What if he's changed his play style? But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on. Well here is where we disagree.. And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means. But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do. Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town. Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point? TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething). Have you even read my posts at all?  I think i have been quite clear in what i think.
Yeah i have been reading your posts, i just wanted your general gathering of who you think is scum.
|
rayn agrees with all but 1 of my reads and then calls me scum anyway, probably town rayn.
|
On December 27 2015 13:11 ritoky wrote:
rayn agrees with all but 1 of my reads and then calls me scum anyway, probably town rayn.
Yeah i don't think there is anything "contradicting" in that if that's what you want to say?
And i am not calling you scum am i?
|
On December 27 2015 12:23 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 12:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:16 rsoultin wrote:
@rayn
im not here to argue. i was just trying to understand your perspective and get a read on you. i get what youre saying about gb but im not sure that it makes him town? Is this a firm read of yours, cause you were pretty sure in drams.
It's quite firm. I don't know what you are referring with the bolded part? IS it on D1 (when i considered him town), if so, yes i was -- until D3 (or N2 idk) when he said something super unbelieveable that had no thought behind it. D1 you were quite adamant when i couldnt see it. The problem is gb is posting but not being ADD at all...which is how i read him. like he seems pretty focused on a limited number of things rather than being volatile bear. if youre sure i can drop him for a day cause i like a viva lynch too
pretty much that, he hasn't spazzed out and yelled at me for calling him mafia or tried to make love to me. he is just calm and focused posting. i may be slightly biased because he appears to be tunneling on me and it's pretty w/e.
|
United Kingdom30775 Posts
This game is pretty boring, everyone that posts a lot is relatively towny and the rest can go die in a mafia fire.
|
i did lead a mislynch on him over that read last game tho. maybe it is a bad read now that i should not use. still think he just calls ness bad instead of mafia tho, plus basically re-iterating what HF said about follow-up.
|
On December 27 2015 13:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:11 ritoky wrote:
rayn agrees with all but 1 of my reads and then calls me scum anyway, probably town rayn. Yeah i don't think there is anything "contradicting" in that if that's what you want to say? And i am not calling you scum am i?
oh you're not? i thought the whole "you should have opposite read" and "one game he was super town, but..." indicated scum lean. guess was assuming wrong.
|
On December 27 2015 13:18 Holyflare wrote:
This game is pretty boring, everyone that posts a lot is relatively towny and the rest can go die in a mafia fire.
D:
|
On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta. its bad to go off of meta. It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion. Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart. What if he's changed his play style? But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on. Well here is where we disagree.. And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means. But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do. Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town. Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point? TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething). Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think.
Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it
Seems legit
|
I'm going to go ahead and vote vivax, i'd like to hear a defense from him tho
|
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta. its bad to go off of meta. It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion. Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart. What if he's changed his play style? But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on. Well here is where we disagree.. And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means. But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do. Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town. Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point? TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething). Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think. Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it Seems legit
and your read on kush is: he's a smurf
which he literally explained pre-game when he said "this is a smurf, cuz i can't view kush account at work"
...like wat?
|
On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta. its bad to go off of meta. It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion. Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart. What if he's changed his play style? But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on. Well here is where we disagree.. And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means. But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do. Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town. Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point? TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething). Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think. Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it Seems legit
Except that i don't, which is just explained.
|
hey rayn, you should click on boxerfred's filter. it'll amuse you i am sure.
|
United Kingdom30775 Posts
TickTock I suggest that you catch up and post some fleshed out reads rather than arguing semantics, it'll help expedite things nicely
You can also vote for Vivax or explain why you aren't for free bonus points. Which everyone else should be doing too.
|
On December 27 2015 13:25 Holyflare wrote:TickTock I suggest that you catch up and post some fleshed out reads rather than arguing semantics, it'll help expedite things nicely You can also vote for Vivax or explain why you aren't for free bonus points. Which everyone else should be doing too.
I voted in the voting thread.
##Vote vivax
|
On December 27 2015 13:25 ritoky wrote:
hey rayn, you should click on boxerfred's filter. it'll amuse you i am sure.
I actually did already. He can get lynched if that's the way he is gonna continue playing.
|
On December 27 2015 12:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Hi.
ERMERGERD
|
Gb are we gonna be battle buddies this game?
|
On December 27 2015 13:23 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 13:22 Tictock wrote:On December 27 2015 13:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:06 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 13:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 13:01 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 27 2015 12:48 N e s s wrote:On December 27 2015 12:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because i think Trfel is like 100% town based on meta. its bad to go off of meta. It's not. And i don't even consider him 100% town. It was just to express -- based on rotoky's read, that if you do go off by meta, as he did, he should come to another conclusion. Well, it kinda is. You don't know when or how a person thinks. So going off of their experience isn't very smart. What if he's changed his play style? But i haven't played any other games with any of you, so i'm going to go ahead and assume that your logic of him being town isn't bad, but it shouldn't be relied on. Well here is where we disagree.. And it's probably because we have a different definition of what "meta" means. But let's not argue about this since it is pointless. I can 100% tell i am not going to lynch anyone based on meta, only for what they do / do not do. Meta means mafia game experience/behaveior traits as mafia/town. Yeah i wasn't going to argue with you regardless, but i am curious, who do you think is scum at this point? TT, Vivax, kushmasta maybe (i dont remember his scumr name anymore, noomanoomasomething). Have you even read my posts at all? I think i have been quite clear in what i think. Sure you have basically the same read as me on Kush but I'm scum for it Seems legit and your read on kush is: he's a smurf which he literally explained pre-game when he said "this is a smurf, cuz i can't view kush account at work"
...like wat?
Ah, I didn't see that
|
On December 27 2015 13:25 Holyflare wrote:TickTock I suggest that you catch up and post some fleshed out reads rather than arguing semantics, it'll help expedite things nicely You can also vote for Vivax or explain why you aren't for free bonus points. Which everyone else should be doing too.
No thanks.
Might vote Vivax though, we'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4404
3002
295
113
EPT
