EPTOUTLAW MINI MAFIA - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:19 ritoky wrote: oh you're not? i thought the whole "you should have opposite read" and "one game he was super town, but..." indicated scum lean. guess was assuming wrong. To be honest i would prolly consider you scum if it wasn't for the read on BH in that one game.... I actually do think Trfel jumping to conclusions without proofreading what he says beforehand is is quite big of a towntell for him. It's like... he thinks something is true (which can be clearly seen from his posts), then figures out he is wrong (or something happens) and he backs off. I think it shows he is thinking about the game, and i have no idea why you think that is scummy. Also his posts were not bad at all on any level, as as i said it shows he is actually re-evaluating his reads. Him having much/few reads at the point of the game is not alignment indicative i think. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
But seriously I'm not entirely sure that bivax is a good lynch at this moment | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
So you just selectively decided to read some of my posts and not all of them? Why? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:38 Damdred wrote: I'm kinda sad hf isn't lobbying for me to vote vivax yet, ignored and alone rip. But seriously I'm not entirely sure that bivax is a good lynch at this moment You should be voting for Vivax. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
cya tomorrow. | ||
|
N e s s
105 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
N e s s
105 Posts
Also i understand why you think Vivax is scum, but why are you asking everyone to vote for him? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:10 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler [N E S S post] + On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. + Show Spoiler [My response] + I like these responses. No further questions your honor. To answer some of your queries though, I mentioned MoosyDoosy because you had bolded 4 questions but seemed concerned about why people were voting Moosy (game relevant information), I would have thought that question would have been a 5th bolded question since it was game relevant and not an afterthought in one of your bolded questions or later. Also at the time there were no answers to it you just said you use the information later and I couldn't see how you would use the colour of someone's choice over the game relevant information. And while yes your first two questions were "analytical" they were questions that anybody could ask and weren't showing insight into information that had popped up. GB can you elaborate on why you refuse to want to lynch Vivax? He has dodged every situation and game relevant scenario to do nothing and somehow that makes you not want to lynch him, the player who doesn't really play as mafia? Lately, Vivax gameplay has been uninspiring as either alignment. There was a game he was mislynched day1 because he played somehow similar like this. Which makes him more null than scummy. I'm not saying he couldn't be Mafia. I'm just saying that there is nothing that scummy in his filter that makes him deserve to be the lynch | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:46 N e s s wrote: Also i understand why you think Vivax is scum, but why are you asking everyone to vote for him? It is well known that if you can get the person you think is mafia lynched, that you have an enormous penis. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: To be honest i would prolly consider you scum if it wasn't for the read on BH in that one game.... I actually do think Trfel jumping to conclusions without proofreading what he says beforehand is is quite big of a towntell for him. It's like... he thinks something is true (which can be clearly seen from his posts), then figures out he is wrong (or something happens) and he backs off. I think it shows he is thinking about the game, and i have no idea why you think that is scummy. Also his posts were not bad at all on any level, as as i said it shows he is actually re-evaluating his reads. Him having much/few reads at the point of the game is not alignment indicative i think. i was mafia with him quite recently and he was rather meek and unsure that game. very non-committal, asking for advice, waiting to pick a side until later etc. some of that meek tone and play i see so far in this game. | ||
|
N e s s
105 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:49 N e s s wrote: Just curious, is there a way to know if someone is viewing the thread or no? No. | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:14 ritoky wrote: pretty much that, he hasn't spazzed out and yelled at me for calling him mafia or tried to make love to me. he is just calm and focused posting. i may be slightly biased because he appears to be tunneling on me and it's pretty w/e. I'm actually trying to further evaluate you. I didn't like that post I've quoted earlier but I was ok with your answer, and it seems people don't agree with me. I'm still waiting for your answer tho | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:50 GlowingBear wrote: I'm actually trying to further evaluate you. I didn't like that post I've quoted earlier but I was ok with your answer, and it seems people don't agree with me. I'm still waiting for your answer tho what post? i must have missed it | ||
| ||
I think i have been quite clear in what i think.
