Newbie Student Mafia XVIII - Page 9

On January 06 2016 23:47 NocturneMage wrote:
I'm getting interrupted at work. GlowingBear, I want to pick up at post 1186 when I return.

How much longer are you around?

On January 07 2016 00:28 Kmatt wrote:
While I can't pin the vote switch yesterday as being inherently scummy, the fact that GiygaS skirted by for so long with so little contribution to the thread is troubling. I've only got about 20 minutes before I head out for the rest of this day phase (curse you Wednesday morning shifts) so if anyone has anything to run by me I need to hear it and now. If my math is right another mislynch today and we're six kinds of screwed. Not that I doubt my reads but I want to be as sure as possible since I can't respond to any shenanigans.

On January 07 2016 00:48 Kmatt wrote:
What's wrong with my post?

On January 07 2016 01:01 NocturneMage wrote:
phoneposting -



I don't understand

(1) why is mderg mafia? Your reason for scumming him boils down to his style. I read his town games (disclaimer - could not get to his scum games yet) and his style in this game is similar to his town games. so I don't like your argument and any of the arguments against him on passivity. Of further note, mderg has gotten mislynched a bunch of times looking at his record.

(2) your points against gigyas are somewhat legitimate regarding not understanding his reads, mindset but I also agree with Noon that how he's formulating scumteams looks towny. what I had wanted to ask you was the way you attacked his approach to the thread, he gave a lot of RL excuses but those excuses were nai.

where I have more trouble is that gigyas had posted since yet you made that same conclusion.

On January 07 2016 01:24 nooniansoong wrote:
@GB
- why townread FF if you have agreed that he's not confirmed town just because of the replacement.
-why townread fidei even after that bad case? Obviously your case on mderg or gigyas is not that strong, since your reasoning is mostly based on their passive playstyle. SO why not consider fidei?

On January 07 2016 01:26 nooniansoong wrote:


So what's left is lack of reads and passivity. Right?

On January 07 2016 07:17 disformation wrote:
disformafia's ranty rant QT

Disclaimer: I love you all, despite the rant QT suggesting otherwise at some points.
Warning: May contain some mild swear words.

+ Show Spoiler +

On January 07 2016 11:26 scott31337 wrote:
.... Fidei was really obvious but GB was soo defending him I thought they were a team for sure.

oh well GG

On January 07 2016 23:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Yeah you tried and it wasn't that bad tbh. If not anything else at least you didn't get mislynched and well... none of the townies had really good reads based on the outcome of the game so...

Also idk... have you played mafia elsewhere in the meantime? I remember you in some TL Mafia [insert number here] game ~2-3yrs ago.

On January 08 2016 07:51 GiygaS wrote:
May make a chrome extension this weekend to annotate posts like geript did for personal notes actually. Would anyone else be interested?

On January 08 2016 18:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:

what does this mean? i am interested.


true. it doesn't matter much though if everyone wants to kil lyou with fire and you get lynched.
and you voted for scott in the end...

On January 08 2016 19:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The problem with scott is the same kinda problem that people have with VayneAuthority.

People don't interact with them a single bit. They just watch them post and at the EoD (or before) they decide "well you haven't posted anything meaningful now you die". It's an easy lynch for mafia, but usually town's fault. If you feel like someone isn't making conclusions / posting enough / discussing relevant matters -- guide them onto talking about what YOU want them to talk about (relevant matters). Interact with them.

In hindsight, scott had (after his earlier reads posts) these thoughts;
I think Onegu has good reads as town --> I think Onegu is town --> I wanna sheep him onto lynching Fidei.
wow.. wanted to lynch mafia.