Haunted Mansion Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 24 2015 01:42 Koshi wrote: Oh and what a dickmove by marv /in | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 24 2015 23:58 NocturneMage wrote: The real question is whether we can trust disformation. He was waffly last game. But he was town, surely we can trust him to be our guide. Surely, right? clue's in the name brah | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 25 2015 07:23 ANickelDrink wrote: I don't think I understand the point of a smurf if I roll town. out with it then broski | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 25 2015 07:26 ANickelDrink wrote: I am fecalfeast. Like I'm sitting here worrying about my typing style and that's just stupid wifom almost as wifom as saying there's no point smurfing as town and revealing yourself, huh :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 25 2015 11:43 Chromatically wrote: GB, what do you think about OO and Sn0's reactions to the sicklucker-FF situation? I think I like OO's reaction the least out of anyone. I like your point about TicTock too, though. I had this problem last game i played OO where his posts all seemed really stilted and formulaic and emotionless, except he was town. So that was fun | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 25 2015 23:58 GlowingBear wrote: Well but this is not Chrom's argument on OO I never said it was, sweetheart. It was a semi-related comment | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 00:11 GlowingBear wrote: Marv can you tell us what do you think of Tictock and OO and comment on what has been brought on both of them? how many games have you played with me now? if I had something worthwhile to say about either, do you estimate the chances i'd just sit on it silently to be a) low b) very low c) non-existent d) eerily homosexual ? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 02:13 GlowingBear wrote: Letter D!!! I know, Marv. But if I say "someone is scummy because of X", you automatically have an opinion that is either "I agree this is scummy", "I disagree this is scummy" or "it is NAI". Being silent may imply the latter, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly say that in the thead I always feel compelled to ask you questions, anyway. This is how I play. I try to get people to talk And I always feel compelled to remind people that I offer my opinions when I have them | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 02:10 Chromatically wrote: I'm totally alright with having a wagon on TicTock. marv makes me a bit uncomfortable for now but I feel like that will become clearer with time. just you wait till i get my tunnel that's not really a tunnel on you, you'll feel much better | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 03:26 Koshi wrote: Imo we should just lynch marv tbh. Nothing wrong with it. It has been ages since he actually found mafia d1 and got his target lynched. If we lynch town today and marv did is standard boring poe thingie on that person I wouldnt even be surprised. I guess we can give him 24 more hours. But everybody should prepare their minds and bodies for a d1 marv lynch. ##Vote: Koshi The red, and in general the whole post, is toxic, because it doesn't give reasons for me to be mafia. In the post it says: marv hasn't found mafia on day 1 recently, so we should lynch him. The rest of the post says we should lynch marv because he does PoE. Nowhere in the post are there reasons for me to be mafia. His only reason is that I haven't been catching mafia on day 1. As town. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
it does make more sense in that context i don't know why you feel the need to constantly alert town to lynching me day 1 when i will never get lynched day 1 when i am town, and if i am mafia then it doesn't need you to alert town because that's obvious enough on its own in fact the only real motivation is that it might tilt me as i respond notoriously badly to idiots suggesting lynches on me for bad reasons so why are you doing it exactly? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 04:34 Sn0_Man wrote: Why would marv not finding scum day 1 as town make him scum now for being useless and not finding scum? Also, why would "nothing wrong with it" be good justification for a lynch? I agree that marv's play has been lazy and unhelpful to town in a way that makes me suspicious, but unlike you I prefer the approach proposed by... (gb i think) that waits until marv has proven himself to not be scumhunting before trying to open up his lynch. So while I liked your sentiment to an extent (that marv isn't playing townie, not that we lynch him today), I really disliked the way you worded and went about your post. Which is what marv pointed out already, which makes things more confusing. my play hasn't been lazy, it's been efficient laziness would mean i'm not doing things when there are things to be done but there aren't things for me to do, so i can't possibly be clarified as lazy like saying i'm lazy for sitting on the sofa watching tv when there are chores to do, except there are no chores to do so i can do whatever i like because i'm awesome | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 04:37 Sn0_Man wrote: I detest ur "its obvious enough on its own when i'm maf" defense marv I've lost to ur maf play everyone has including in invite games for the best players on the site, but i like to keep that quiet to make my life easier also i'm a much... lazier :D scumplayer than i ever used to be | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
why on earth are you calling it a defence? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 04:39 Sn0_Man wrote: ? Koshi "we shud be ready to lynch marv" marv "don't lynch me its obvious when i'm maf" ? ok so i don't need to talk to you anymore, cool | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 26 2015 04:40 marvellosity wrote: ok so i don't need to talk to you anymore, cool to clarify: what my post said was "it's pointless for koshi to tell the thread they can lynch marv" and you somehow morphed that into me saying "don't lynch me" nowhere did i say please don't lynch me or don't lynch me this should be really obvious stuff | ||
| ||