EPT[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:07 Xatalos wrote: Yeah you messed up the vote timing I think? Well, you basically lost because of it, so I can understand getting angry in that situation. yep, completely the same thing than getting mad at someone's terrible argument, right?  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:12 Xatalos wrote: Haha... Btw is there some real difference in rayn's ragefests between alignments? Maybe he gets angry a bit easier as town? I don't think he even got really MAD in the VS game, compared to the Vanilla game. Probably not. I don't actually fake emotion as mafia. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:15 kitaman27 wrote: Do you find Rels would be so antagonistic against you, the person pushing discussion in the thread, on day one as spy? Making firm conclusions like "rayn leaving the thread as soon as he's being pushed is scum indicative. Please don't include him in a team.". Definitely could be the case given how the last game with Xatalos went. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:14 Half the Sky wrote: No not really but if I had to Kita was more scummy than Rels, and rayn is more town if I am splitting hairs than Superbia. Nulls - SL/Artanis are policy lynch equivalent. At least Shockey is now trying to do something. And rayn, quick response to your question as I read Xata's filter - my comments there were in reference to that Shockey is (meta) reading you off one game. The read isn't malicious (from what I can tell) but I pointed out that his tone is NAI and he assumed it to be so. It's wrong, I pointed out why it's wrong, but as we are discussing it, there is no malicious (mafia) intent. Still I feel I need more to see him more clear as town because that is the only substance I see from him now. Does that make sense? Not really, no. Because the read is purely based on bullshit and that is the only thing he has said, in a game where you are supposed to find townies over scum. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:17 Xatalos wrote: Well, I can kind of agree with that. It didn't really even feel like a "malicious" twisting of rayn's meta, just wrong. Do you really think that is the scummiest thing he can find in this thread at that point? Like really? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:20 Xatalos wrote: Well, it reminded me a bit of my case on you last game  (you similarly OMGUSing me both times)Let's see what he comes up with now. Again it is not OMGUS when i clearly point out why his case is scummy. For you too: "OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you." which is literally here, as in the last game NOT doing. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:25 Half the Sky wrote: However, based on your use of the word "bullshit" I am interpreting this as you seeing his read on you as malicious/mafia intent. I did not think it was. So what are you seeing that I am not? Go read the game he is comparing my meta to here. It's less than 5 pages. You should see what i am talking about. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:22 ShoCkeyy wrote: In all honesty though, Xatalos in that game was more town aligned than you were. Well that's not possibly true because both of our role PM's said vanilla town. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 00:33 ShoCkeyy wrote: Well obviously, but I'm stating it from the POV of a town player that just finished reading up until the point you got killed. Well how does that have anything to do with anything? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
HtS sicklucker/Artanis Rels(pending) kitaman ShoCkeyy | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
@rayn, you felt that his push on xat was town motivated when it occurred initially. I agreed with you at that time since pushing a player to generate discussion is generally town-motivated. However, do you feel this explanation is legit? Yeah i think i have said that at least many times already. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 01:01 Rels wrote: I'm not sure you are. You're attacking people over small logical things and you are thinking about the game as a whole; that is town indicative, but I know you can replicate that as town; at least that what you and several other people claimed before. So why did you actually change my read in the first place? That is what i have been doing all game long, playing to my town meta. Why did you go from sure scum to sure town? And now not so sure town? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On November 03 2015 01:43 Rels wrote: Alright leaving work. HTS, I won't vote a team you or Superbia are part of atm. Obviously that could change between now or deadline. I'm OK with Xata / kita / rayn / me. And awhile ago you were more confident with HtS/Xatalos/Rels team succeeding a mission than rayn in it. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
So is ShoCkeyy. Well this is going to be easy. I am basically okay with any team that does not include either of Rels/ShoCkeyy. If the team fails pick the rest 4 people. I am almost certain we win the game there. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Do you understand the fact that if he is scum calling Superbia scum at the time he did is the only possible play he can make in case HtS is town. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
| ||
