|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 18 2015 22:06 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:58 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:54 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:53 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:51 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:49 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:46 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:32 LoneMeow wrote:GlowingBear is top town for me right now, not only did he get the game to move on from the "joke" phase but there's also this: On October 18 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote:
There is no such thing as "deciding a meta". You play to win and that's all.
This is town thinking. As for the FarahBlackwing, there's a paranoid scenario I can see where the whole thing was orchestrated in advance but that's not relevant for now, I suppose. Unflipped players and all that. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy.
Why wouldn't he make a list post? Some reads are needed to get the "serious" phase of the game started, I don't quite see that list post being scum motivated at all. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above.
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB.
I want to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy.
So the read is wrong (ie. he's town misreading) but you'd want to lynch him (ie. he's scum)? What? again where did I say he was town? reading is really hard for some people. If his read on you is wrong then you are clearly implying he's town. Scum doesn't have "right" or "wrong" reads. no it just says he is wrong. Okay, so why exactly is he scum? Why was the list post bad at the time it was made, besides being a list post? To me it seems much more like town mentality to try to get the game moving in a more serious direction after the "joke phase" as some call it. how is this of any value if you already decided he was town? I'm interested in your alignment, and you explaining your though process and logic helps in that. then why vote me before asking? Vote is also a tool to provoke reactions. Why do you not want to help me figure out your alignment?
well you managed to provoke a reaction in my brain were I'm convinced you're stupid. good job
|
On October 18 2015 22:12 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 22:06 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:58 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:54 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:53 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:51 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:49 LoneMeow wrote:On October 18 2015 21:46 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 21:32 LoneMeow wrote:
GlowingBear is top town for me right now, not only did he get the game to move on from the "joke" phase but there's also this:
[quote]
This is town thinking.
As for the FarahBlackwing, there's a paranoid scenario I can see where the whole thing was orchestrated in advance but that's not relevant for now, I suppose. Unflipped players and all that.
[quote]
Why wouldn't he make a list post? Some reads are needed to get the "serious" phase of the game started, I don't quite see that list post being scum motivated at all.
[quote]
So the read is wrong (ie. he's town misreading) but you'd want to lynch him (ie. he's scum)? What? again where did I say he was town? reading is really hard for some people. If his read on you is wrong then you are clearly implying he's town. Scum doesn't have "right" or "wrong" reads. no it just says he is wrong. Okay, so why exactly is he scum? Why was the list post bad at the time it was made, besides being a list post? To me it seems much more like town mentality to try to get the game moving in a more serious direction after the "joke phase" as some call it. how is this of any value if you already decided he was town? I'm interested in your alignment, and you explaining your though process and logic helps in that. then why vote me before asking? Vote is also a tool to provoke reactions. Why do you not want to help me figure out your alignment? well you managed to provoke a reaction in my brain were I'm convinced you're stupid. good job
Glad to serve!
/bow
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
|
|
Like moew just did something I always do as mafia. not even gonna say it because I dont want people to know and no one will believe me anyway. book it!
|
On October 18 2015 21:43 LoneMeow wrote:Care to expand your reasoning on scott31337?
On October 18 2015 20:28 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 07:35 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 07:00 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 18 2015 06:57 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 06:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I mean. I'll give you guys a legitimate reason to scumread me if you want it. Right now the stuff ya'll are flinging is weak. Explain your vote on GB like I'm five years old. I decide to have a bit of fun as GB was my Mafia partner in the game where I doubled bused my partners. As a result, I ask him as a joke if I can bus him this game. GB understands the joke and says that I should say it in the QT. As a continuation of the joke I say it's too late and remark that I'll be confirmed town after the "bus" and then vote for GB. Just was making sure - Thank you. REALLY BRO ? YOU REMARKED HE WAS JOKING AND YOU WERE JUST MAKING SURE ??? THAT S EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT READING YOUR POSTS. NOT. Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 06:33 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 05:26 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 18 2015 05:25 GlowingBear wrote:On October 18 2015 05:21 MoosyDoosy wrote:
GB can i bus you again? And there is a QT to discuss this Moosy, you shouldn't be telling that to everyone else welp too late. ##Vote: GlowingBear And a shit early vote. Now he's spamming up the thread. I'm not caring for this play so far. Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 06:57 scott31337 wrote:On October 18 2015 06:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I mean. I'll give you guys a legitimate reason to scumread me if you want it. Right now the stuff ya'll are flinging is weak. Explain your vote on GB like I'm five years old.
|
Oh okay!
Now I'm convinced
|
On October 18 2015 21:45 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 11:35 The Shining wrote:
And yay GB is trying to get the game started. Let's see...
I agree with the Farah read. I agree that that question would've been better off in the scumQT if she rolled scum and it is a WIFOM argument but the timing of it seemed genuinely curious and not holding back in her questioning of Moosy and GBs jokes is another town point. As far as the tunneling goes, keeping in mind she's a newer player, I could understand the hesitance to look more broadly because she's being asked to do so by GB, who she suspected could be scum. I wouldn't want to cooperate with someone I think is scum, either.
Sigh. My openings are always horrendous, especially in town games. Thanks for noticing. The joke phase isn't something I've ever really been apart of and not something I'm a huge fan of, but seeing as how it was the only thing going on, I didn't want to just sit around and not post. I find it a little odd, though, that you pick on my horrendous opening but then find my Scott post very okay. I guess it makes sense if you still have me at null, though.
Moosy is pretty null to me right now. His banter is NAI to me and the picking a meta talk seemed like it was just more of him trying to keep the joke phase up but the longer he does things like that without actually scum hunting, the more I'll suspect him. I didn't like the threatening to not care, either, but knowing he has double bussed to win a game before(meaning he cared enough to do so) makes it NAI, as well.
Not sure about Kels, either. You might be right but before I go into it, I'd like to know if he was actually serious about that post. Kelsier can you answer this for me?
I'd like Vonthin to answer what I asked, too, before I go too in-depth on him but from what I've seen so far, he could just be frustrated town not knowing how to deal with a slow day start.
Overall I'd give GB a slight townlean just for making this post and trying to push discussion, as I agree with a few things in the post. GB what do you think of boxerfreds entrance? Why wasn't he included in your list? The joke phase between the three of you was so incredibly unfunny and I would have happily lynched all of you, upon reflection there was probably one mafia trying way too hard. Moosy was just spamming complete nonsense it made me want to give up reading. That was my interpretation of the events up to that point. GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy. His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above. The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. I want to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy. "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." Does. Not. Compute. He's talking about GB as if he's town and wrong, but he's scumreading him. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. when did I say GB was town
Are you serious bro.
1 - The explanation is in my post: "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum."
2 - You didn't answer the interesting part:
On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 18 2015 22:56 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 21:45 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 11:35 The Shining wrote:
And yay GB is trying to get the game started. Let's see...
I agree with the Farah read. I agree that that question would've been better off in the scumQT if she rolled scum and it is a WIFOM argument but the timing of it seemed genuinely curious and not holding back in her questioning of Moosy and GBs jokes is another town point. As far as the tunneling goes, keeping in mind she's a newer player, I could understand the hesitance to look more broadly because she's being asked to do so by GB, who she suspected could be scum. I wouldn't want to cooperate with someone I think is scum, either.
Sigh. My openings are always horrendous, especially in town games. Thanks for noticing. The joke phase isn't something I've ever really been apart of and not something I'm a huge fan of, but seeing as how it was the only thing going on, I didn't want to just sit around and not post. I find it a little odd, though, that you pick on my horrendous opening but then find my Scott post very okay. I guess it makes sense if you still have me at null, though.
Moosy is pretty null to me right now. His banter is NAI to me and the picking a meta talk seemed like it was just more of him trying to keep the joke phase up but the longer he does things like that without actually scum hunting, the more I'll suspect him. I didn't like the threatening to not care, either, but knowing he has double bussed to win a game before(meaning he cared enough to do so) makes it NAI, as well.
Not sure about Kels, either. You might be right but before I go into it, I'd like to know if he was actually serious about that post. Kelsier can you answer this for me?
I'd like Vonthin to answer what I asked, too, before I go too in-depth on him but from what I've seen so far, he could just be frustrated town not knowing how to deal with a slow day start.
Overall I'd give GB a slight townlean just for making this post and trying to push discussion, as I agree with a few things in the post. GB what do you think of boxerfreds entrance? Why wasn't he included in your list? The joke phase between the three of you was so incredibly unfunny and I would have happily lynched all of you, upon reflection there was probably one mafia trying way too hard. Moosy was just spamming complete nonsense it made me want to give up reading. That was my interpretation of the events up to that point. GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy. His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above. The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. I want to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy. "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." Does. Not. Compute. He's talking about GB as if he's town and wrong, but he's scumreading him. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. when did I say GB was town Are you serious bro. 1 - The explanation is in my post: "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." 2 - You didn't answer the interesting part: Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand.
ok, bro
you confused interesting with stupid. If you actually read my latest posts I wouldn't have to rehash.
|
Who is mafia with scott, Kelsier?
|
On October 18 2015 23:01 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 22:56 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 21:45 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 11:35 The Shining wrote:
And yay GB is trying to get the game started. Let's see...
I agree with the Farah read. I agree that that question would've been better off in the scumQT if she rolled scum and it is a WIFOM argument but the timing of it seemed genuinely curious and not holding back in her questioning of Moosy and GBs jokes is another town point. As far as the tunneling goes, keeping in mind she's a newer player, I could understand the hesitance to look more broadly because she's being asked to do so by GB, who she suspected could be scum. I wouldn't want to cooperate with someone I think is scum, either.
Sigh. My openings are always horrendous, especially in town games. Thanks for noticing. The joke phase isn't something I've ever really been apart of and not something I'm a huge fan of, but seeing as how it was the only thing going on, I didn't want to just sit around and not post. I find it a little odd, though, that you pick on my horrendous opening but then find my Scott post very okay. I guess it makes sense if you still have me at null, though.
Moosy is pretty null to me right now. His banter is NAI to me and the picking a meta talk seemed like it was just more of him trying to keep the joke phase up but the longer he does things like that without actually scum hunting, the more I'll suspect him. I didn't like the threatening to not care, either, but knowing he has double bussed to win a game before(meaning he cared enough to do so) makes it NAI, as well.
Not sure about Kels, either. You might be right but before I go into it, I'd like to know if he was actually serious about that post. Kelsier can you answer this for me?
I'd like Vonthin to answer what I asked, too, before I go too in-depth on him but from what I've seen so far, he could just be frustrated town not knowing how to deal with a slow day start.
Overall I'd give GB a slight townlean just for making this post and trying to push discussion, as I agree with a few things in the post. GB what do you think of boxerfreds entrance? Why wasn't he included in your list? The joke phase between the three of you was so incredibly unfunny and I would have happily lynched all of you, upon reflection there was probably one mafia trying way too hard. Moosy was just spamming complete nonsense it made me want to give up reading. That was my interpretation of the events up to that point. GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy. His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above. The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. I want to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy. "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." Does. Not. Compute. He's talking about GB as if he's town and wrong, but he's scumreading him. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. when did I say GB was town Are you serious bro. 1 - The explanation is in my post: "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." 2 - You didn't answer the interesting part: On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. ok, bro you confused interesting with stupid. If you actually read my latest posts I wouldn't have to rehash.
Assuming you're talking about this:
On October 18 2015 21:51 KelsierSC wrote:
most of the list was null and based off of a "joke phase" you have people with "horrendous openings etc." and that makes them null but I "have to be scum" because I pointed out how terrible the opening of the game was.
That is not true. He pointed out things for each of his reads that made sense. And he left out the people he had nothing to say about.
|
Alright boys will be mostly inactive until tommorow. Take care all!
|
|
|
Game is not going well...
|
no and its snowing outside...
|
On October 18 2015 23:19 sicklucker wrote:
no and its snowing outside...
42 Celsius in Rio \o/
|
Hi, I'm sitting around reading the game and Idk if I should just post things in a list? I'll try that and see how it goes.
I'm pretty convinced at this juncture that lone is town a bit. Or at least worth keeping around for another day. There seems to be some form of curiosity and pushing in the questions that he is asking. And when pointed to the database(great tool btw) it looks remarkably different from the other games where they have rolled scum.
I also now think that glowingbear is more than likely town. She just seems to be trying to help the thread in a decent direction and trying to give her reads in a concise fashion. I think she is town.
I think my no st controversial read here is shining. I think he's town, just from general knowledge and looking at other games (his last scum game especially) the posts don't seem longish/boring and have a flair and really playful. While it's worth noting it's preliminary I think there's a good shot at him being town.
Any questions just ask and I'll try to answer.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 18 2015 23:03 GlowingBear wrote:
Who is mafia with scott, Kelsier?
don't be fucking stupid dude
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 18 2015 23:10 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 23:01 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 22:56 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 21:45 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:On October 18 2015 11:35 The Shining wrote:
And yay GB is trying to get the game started. Let's see...
I agree with the Farah read. I agree that that question would've been better off in the scumQT if she rolled scum and it is a WIFOM argument but the timing of it seemed genuinely curious and not holding back in her questioning of Moosy and GBs jokes is another town point. As far as the tunneling goes, keeping in mind she's a newer player, I could understand the hesitance to look more broadly because she's being asked to do so by GB, who she suspected could be scum. I wouldn't want to cooperate with someone I think is scum, either.
Sigh. My openings are always horrendous, especially in town games. Thanks for noticing. The joke phase isn't something I've ever really been apart of and not something I'm a huge fan of, but seeing as how it was the only thing going on, I didn't want to just sit around and not post. I find it a little odd, though, that you pick on my horrendous opening but then find my Scott post very okay. I guess it makes sense if you still have me at null, though.
Moosy is pretty null to me right now. His banter is NAI to me and the picking a meta talk seemed like it was just more of him trying to keep the joke phase up but the longer he does things like that without actually scum hunting, the more I'll suspect him. I didn't like the threatening to not care, either, but knowing he has double bussed to win a game before(meaning he cared enough to do so) makes it NAI, as well.
Not sure about Kels, either. You might be right but before I go into it, I'd like to know if he was actually serious about that post. Kelsier can you answer this for me?
I'd like Vonthin to answer what I asked, too, before I go too in-depth on him but from what I've seen so far, he could just be frustrated town not knowing how to deal with a slow day start.
Overall I'd give GB a slight townlean just for making this post and trying to push discussion, as I agree with a few things in the post. GB what do you think of boxerfreds entrance? Why wasn't he included in your list? The joke phase between the three of you was so incredibly unfunny and I would have happily lynched all of you, upon reflection there was probably one mafia trying way too hard. Moosy was just spamming complete nonsense it made me want to give up reading. That was my interpretation of the events up to that point. GlowingBear's list post: Before looking in detail at what he posted it feels too early to be making a list post. Half the game hasn't posted, it doesn't feel correct. Furthermore I can't understand why he feels the need to make a list post for one townlean that has doubt to it, one scumlean and then just null players. the only post that anyone would have cared about at all was him calling me scummy. His scumread of me is, in typical GB fashion, wrong. I've explained my post above. The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. I want to wait and see but if the lynch was now i'd lynch GB and Moosy. "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." Does. Not. Compute. He's talking about GB as if he's town and wrong, but he's scumreading him. On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. when did I say GB was town Are you serious bro. 1 - The explanation is in my post: "GB's read of me is wrong, as usual. In fact, all his reads are illogical, as usual. Oh BTW, he's scum." 2 - You didn't answer the interesting part: On October 18 2015 20:59 Rels wrote:On October 18 2015 17:24 KelsierSC wrote:
The rest of his list doesn't make logical sense to me but again that is typical GB. KSC: Please expand. ok, bro you confused interesting with stupid. If you actually read my latest posts I wouldn't have to rehash. Assuming you're talking about this: Show nested quote +On October 18 2015 21:51 KelsierSC wrote:
most of the list was null and based off of a "joke phase" you have people with "horrendous openings etc." and that makes them null but I "have to be scum" because I pointed out how terrible the opening of the game was. That is not true. He pointed out things for each of his reads that made sense. And he left out the people he had nothing to say about.
ok, you realise nothing you said is actually a counterpoint to what I said.
|
On October 18 2015 23:36 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Hi, I'm sitting around reading the game and Idk if I should just post things in a list? I'll try that and see how it goes.
I'm pretty convinced at this juncture that lone is town a bit. Or at least worth keeping around for another day. There seems to be some form of curiosity and pushing in the questions that he is asking. And when pointed to the database(great tool btw) it looks remarkably different from the other games where they have rolled scum.
I also now think that glowingbear is more than likely town. She just seems to be trying to help the thread in a decent direction and trying to give her reads in a concise fashion. I think she is town.
I think my no st controversial read here is shining. I think he's town, just from general knowledge and looking at other games (his last scum game especially) the posts don't seem longish/boring and have a flair and really playful. While it's worth noting it's preliminary I think there's a good shot at him being town.
Any questions just ask and I'll try to answer.
Yes. What about Moosy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
