|
On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh
marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios
especially since damdy isn't scum either
marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/ this was where i townread him for his reaction, early yesterday morning over 24 hours ago, and when i actually unvoted the sexy post was like 6-8 hours after that between classes cause i liked his vote on moosy and i thought rayn's bitching over semantics was just as asinine as marv's post suggested OK let me check if that makes sense
It doesn't fucking make sense
marv did things between this post and your scumread of him. The two main things are him defending Trfel and attacking Moosy, both things you're in agreement with!
On September 29 2015 23:27 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2015 23:25 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:12 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:07 marvellosity wrote:
ok. i'm not sure how/why that's the same though? It's like he says one thing then suddenly he says something completely different when anything should really have not changed in his opinion. It's not obvious from the post you quoted, but if that is what happened, then it is similar to this game's rsoultin read progression. Trfel had called ruxxar mafia for 3 ird-days. (D1/N1). On D2 he says what is quoted red in my post. oooo I thought you were talking about deconduo's read!! Yeah if he scumread ruxxar all game, the sentence "I need to look closer at ruxxar" makes 0 sense. It is not exactly what's happening this game (Trfel didn't forget why he was scumreading rsoultin; he dismissed it, then found another reason) but it's similar! Perfect (= i'm sure i might just be mad, but they don't seem that similar to me at all 1. scumreading someone (seriously) all game -> saying you need to look at them/forgetting what it is 2. scumreading someone with no particular pretense of a read -> weird waffle
On September 30 2015 00:40 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: moosydoosy
for the shit tlname read and the shitty vote on me, a null player placing really unwarranted implicit trust in Damdred's metaread
How can you scumread marv on this series of posts when the two maings things he's done are in agreement with your reads ?
|
On September 30 2015 21:55 rsoultin wrote:
scott's list had one scumread in it
mostly townreads and maybe a couple nulls
you don't say it's good just cause it's good i want real reasons...why do you think a list of a ton of weakly reasoned town and null reads is good?
'cause he did exactly that type of list every game I've seen him play as town, and I agreed with the scum and town reads he gave
|
On September 30 2015 21:54 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 21:46 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:33 rsoultin wrote:
okay, rels, reads and reasons
your ls read has been static, that i remember distinctly
so has your truffle read
what was good about scott's list post?
who else do you think is scum and why?
townreads?
i want it all...i'd rather push scum as a counterwagon so if you're town, help me out here LS is probably town for being serious at the beginning of the game. I'm concerned about him not doing anything since, but you validated his school excuse GB, marv, rayn, Shining, Damdred are all probably town Moosy is probably town because he is making sense sicklucker brings points I understand. I liked his attack on Trfel. I failed reading him in the two games I try so I'll need help on this one scott list matched my reads so I found it good. I was scumreading JRoc though so I'm not sure about hm Trfel may be scum, I liked his answer to the LS stuff and I liked the fact that he was catching up and commenting things. We need to talk about his read on you coolTLname is probably scum, and I don't know why you're protecting him so much you are probably scum at most you have one scum in here so you're already failing hard if you're town why is cool probably scum? cause you think he's lying about not being a smurf? i'm not protecting him so much as no one's arguments are very convincing at all through the prism that he's new, and i know that he's new and not a smurf based on student mafia V @.@ he was town in that game making horrendous mistakes and got modkilled for it...they were not veteran mistakes. there is NO REASON to think he is a smurf and i refuse to lynch people for stupid arguments like that
you are not reading the game
On September 30 2015 05:52 Rels wrote:still this more or less: Show nested quote +On September 29 2015 21:21 Rels wrote:This first post by coolTLname is super scummy. It is his first post, and he talks about a lot of differents subjects. A first post with different subjects is scum indicative as mafia usually has a hard time entering the thread. Plus, I don't know how GB's posts being mechanical and rayn's posts being mechanical are mixed up. Plus, he agrees on a Moosy's posts that I don't understand. Plus, he next post is scummy too: On September 29 2015 16:47 coolTLname wrote:
So i noticed mafia can hold their KP, this makes claiming Roleblock and framing someone possible, as well as fake vet claims. Anyway i propose anyone who claims a blue role to be lynched automatically, if there is no kill , better to leave it in the dark?
Can medics heal themselves? Two useless questions. After that he posted one more time and gtfo. without the Moosy part Plus he has refused to explain his weird GF read on you, so I cannot know if he has a reasonning behind it Plus he's clearly trolling, I don't know why a town under suspicion would act like that. But Dandel did exactly that last game, so that makes me wary of lynching him
|
On September 30 2015 22:01 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 21:58 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh
marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios
especially since damdy isn't scum either
marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/ this was where i townread him for his reaction, early yesterday morning over 24 hours ago, and when i actually unvoted the sexy post was like 6-8 hours after that between classes cause i liked his vote on moosy and i thought rayn's bitching over semantics was just as asinine as marv's post suggested OK let me check if that makes sense It doesn't fucking make sense marv did things between this post and your scumread of him. The two main things are him defending Trfel and attacking Moosy, both things you're in agreement with! On September 29 2015 23:27 marvellosity wrote:On September 29 2015 23:25 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:12 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:07 marvellosity wrote:
ok. i'm not sure how/why that's the same though? It's like he says one thing then suddenly he says something completely different when anything should really have not changed in his opinion. It's not obvious from the post you quoted, but if that is what happened, then it is similar to this game's rsoultin read progression. Trfel had called ruxxar mafia for 3 ird-days. (D1/N1). On D2 he says what is quoted red in my post. oooo I thought you were talking about deconduo's read!! Yeah if he scumread ruxxar all game, the sentence "I need to look closer at ruxxar" makes 0 sense. It is not exactly what's happening this game (Trfel didn't forget why he was scumreading rsoultin; he dismissed it, then found another reason) but it's similar! Perfect (= i'm sure i might just be mad, but they don't seem that similar to me at all 1. scumreading someone (seriously) all game -> saying you need to look at them/forgetting what it is 2. scumreading someone with no particular pretense of a read -> weird waffle On September 30 2015 00:40 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: moosydoosy
for the shit tlname read and the shitty vote on me, a null player placing really unwarranted implicit trust in Damdred's metaread How can you scumread marv on this series of posts when the two maings things he's done are in agreement with your reads ? i was no longer sure on moosy's being scum at the time i started reevaluating and regardless, him saying things that i agree with does not make him town by default which is why your scott's list post is good cause i agree with the reads assertion is weak as shit my assertion which you are not evaluating while seeing if i say things that make "sense" was that he hadn't done much of anything productive all game...even after he responded to the pressure. specifically i asked damdy if he made any pushes worth pushing this you just quoted has nothing to do with that
it's not only that. marv pushed for Moosy's lynch. Now maybe you disagreed with this read, but you never said it was why you scumread marv; you said it was because he didn't do anything noteworthy. Which is false since he pushed Moosy
|
On September 30 2015 22:04 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 22:01 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:54 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 21:46 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:33 rsoultin wrote:
okay, rels, reads and reasons
your ls read has been static, that i remember distinctly
so has your truffle read
what was good about scott's list post?
who else do you think is scum and why?
townreads?
i want it all...i'd rather push scum as a counterwagon so if you're town, help me out here LS is probably town for being serious at the beginning of the game. I'm concerned about him not doing anything since, but you validated his school excuse GB, marv, rayn, Shining, Damdred are all probably town Moosy is probably town because he is making sense sicklucker brings points I understand. I liked his attack on Trfel. I failed reading him in the two games I try so I'll need help on this one scott list matched my reads so I found it good. I was scumreading JRoc though so I'm not sure about hm Trfel may be scum, I liked his answer to the LS stuff and I liked the fact that he was catching up and commenting things. We need to talk about his read on you coolTLname is probably scum, and I don't know why you're protecting him so much you are probably scum at most you have one scum in here so you're already failing hard if you're town why is cool probably scum? cause you think he's lying about not being a smurf? i'm not protecting him so much as no one's arguments are very convincing at all through the prism that he's new, and i know that he's new and not a smurf based on student mafia V @.@ he was town in that game making horrendous mistakes and got modkilled for it...they were not veteran mistakes. there is NO REASON to think he is a smurf and i refuse to lynch people for stupid arguments like that you are not reading the game On September 30 2015 05:52 Rels wrote:still this more or less: On September 29 2015 21:21 Rels wrote:This first post by coolTLname is super scummy. It is his first post, and he talks about a lot of differents subjects. A first post with different subjects is scum indicative as mafia usually has a hard time entering the thread. Plus, I don't know how GB's posts being mechanical and rayn's posts being mechanical are mixed up. Plus, he agrees on a Moosy's posts that I don't understand. Plus, he next post is scummy too: On September 29 2015 16:47 coolTLname wrote:
So i noticed mafia can hold their KP, this makes claiming Roleblock and framing someone possible, as well as fake vet claims. Anyway i propose anyone who claims a blue role to be lynched automatically, if there is no kill , better to leave it in the dark?
Can medics heal themselves? Two useless questions. After that he posted one more time and gtfo. without the Moosy part Plus he has refused to explain his weird GF read on you, so I cannot know if he has a reasonning behind it Plus he's clearly trolling, I don't know why a town under suspicion would act like that. But Dandel did exactly that last game, so that makes me wary of lynching him i am. it's just a long game ... okay...i can see this. i'm not sure why scum under suspicion trolls either which you're clearly aware this is nai but i can see having an issue with him not explaining the GF read thanks
np. Sorry if I was agressive
|
On September 30 2015 22:09 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 22:05 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 22:01 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 21:58 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh
marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios
especially since damdy isn't scum either
marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/ this was where i townread him for his reaction, early yesterday morning over 24 hours ago, and when i actually unvoted the sexy post was like 6-8 hours after that between classes cause i liked his vote on moosy and i thought rayn's bitching over semantics was just as asinine as marv's post suggested OK let me check if that makes sense It doesn't fucking make sense marv did things between this post and your scumread of him. The two main things are him defending Trfel and attacking Moosy, both things you're in agreement with! On September 29 2015 23:27 marvellosity wrote:On September 29 2015 23:25 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:12 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:07 marvellosity wrote:
ok. i'm not sure how/why that's the same though? It's like he says one thing then suddenly he says something completely different when anything should really have not changed in his opinion. It's not obvious from the post you quoted, but if that is what happened, then it is similar to this game's rsoultin read progression. Trfel had called ruxxar mafia for 3 ird-days. (D1/N1). On D2 he says what is quoted red in my post. oooo I thought you were talking about deconduo's read!! Yeah if he scumread ruxxar all game, the sentence "I need to look closer at ruxxar" makes 0 sense. It is not exactly what's happening this game (Trfel didn't forget why he was scumreading rsoultin; he dismissed it, then found another reason) but it's similar! Perfect (= i'm sure i might just be mad, but they don't seem that similar to me at all 1. scumreading someone (seriously) all game -> saying you need to look at them/forgetting what it is 2. scumreading someone with no particular pretense of a read -> weird waffle On September 30 2015 00:40 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: moosydoosy
for the shit tlname read and the shitty vote on me, a null player placing really unwarranted implicit trust in Damdred's metaread How can you scumread marv on this series of posts when the two maings things he's done are in agreement with your reads ? i was no longer sure on moosy's being scum at the time i started reevaluating and regardless, him saying things that i agree with does not make him town by default which is why your scott's list post is good cause i agree with the reads assertion is weak as shit my assertion which you are not evaluating while seeing if i say things that make "sense" was that he hadn't done much of anything productive all game...even after he responded to the pressure. specifically i asked damdy if he made any pushes worth pushing this you just quoted has nothing to do with that it's not only that. marv pushed for Moosy's lynch. Now maybe you disagreed with this read, but you never said it was why you scumread marv; you said it was because he didn't do anything noteworthy. Which is false since he pushed Moosy i said a push worth pushing...obviously there's some subjectivity involved here he clearly started pushing moosy for voting for him then when off on moosy saying cool "scared" him...which just isn't anything worthwhile imo like even if moosy were scum, why would he be scared of cool? it's definitely not a scum slip and implies just what moosy said it implied...that moosy was calling cool scummy or scum in other words, no, i did not find that push noteworthy or worthy of marv as a player...i liked him voting for moosy cause i was scumreading moosy, nothing more. the sexy comment was mostly for his response to rayn's bitching and the vote, not the argument
this kinda makes sense
fuck I need to think
|
marv your original case is flawed 'cause rsoultin townread you way before these posts:
On September 30 2015 18:28 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 09:59 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 09:56 Damdred wrote:
RS rayn is town? stronger read on you and marv, but i think sohe's being malleable which is more a town trait of his...malleable for rayn, anyway i know that the scott vote contradicts that lol >< Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 09:21 rsoultin wrote:
ye that was about it, other than agree with marv 100% on the semantics argument earlier not as interesting as you think it was rayn lol ><
strong townreads
damdy
rayn
marv
Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 11:09 rsoultin wrote:
eeeehhhh something's off...has marv been pushing anything worth pushing, damdy? i know you think he's lock town, but i don't think he's ever done anything as asinine as park a vote on me with the mandate "make a post you can only make as town"...it's not a scumread at all and i have one of the most difficult playstyles to nail down, if people's difficulty in catching my scumplay is any indication mafia. ##unvote
##vote: rsoultin
She townread you here:
On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh
marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios
especially since damdy isn't scum either
marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/
and between this post and her scumread post you did things, so she could have re evaluated.
So the question is: did your posts between the original townread and the scumread really warranted a scumread ?
Because if that's the case what she's saying makes sense.
The only real thing you did during this series of post was a Moosy push, and here are her reasons for finding this push useless:
On September 30 2015 22:09 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 22:05 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 22:01 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 21:58 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh
marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios
especially since damdy isn't scum either
marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/ this was where i townread him for his reaction, early yesterday morning over 24 hours ago, and when i actually unvoted the sexy post was like 6-8 hours after that between classes cause i liked his vote on moosy and i thought rayn's bitching over semantics was just as asinine as marv's post suggested OK let me check if that makes sense It doesn't fucking make sense marv did things between this post and your scumread of him. The two main things are him defending Trfel and attacking Moosy, both things you're in agreement with! On September 29 2015 23:27 marvellosity wrote:On September 29 2015 23:25 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:12 Rels wrote:On September 29 2015 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 29 2015 23:07 marvellosity wrote:
ok. i'm not sure how/why that's the same though? It's like he says one thing then suddenly he says something completely different when anything should really have not changed in his opinion. It's not obvious from the post you quoted, but if that is what happened, then it is similar to this game's rsoultin read progression. Trfel had called ruxxar mafia for 3 ird-days. (D1/N1). On D2 he says what is quoted red in my post. oooo I thought you were talking about deconduo's read!! Yeah if he scumread ruxxar all game, the sentence "I need to look closer at ruxxar" makes 0 sense. It is not exactly what's happening this game (Trfel didn't forget why he was scumreading rsoultin; he dismissed it, then found another reason) but it's similar! Perfect (= i'm sure i might just be mad, but they don't seem that similar to me at all 1. scumreading someone (seriously) all game -> saying you need to look at them/forgetting what it is 2. scumreading someone with no particular pretense of a read -> weird waffle On September 30 2015 00:40 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: moosydoosy
for the shit tlname read and the shitty vote on me, a null player placing really unwarranted implicit trust in Damdred's metaread How can you scumread marv on this series of posts when the two maings things he's done are in agreement with your reads ? i was no longer sure on moosy's being scum at the time i started reevaluating and regardless, him saying things that i agree with does not make him town by default which is why your scott's list post is good cause i agree with the reads assertion is weak as shit my assertion which you are not evaluating while seeing if i say things that make "sense" was that he hadn't done much of anything productive all game...even after he responded to the pressure. specifically i asked damdy if he made any pushes worth pushing this you just quoted has nothing to do with that it's not only that. marv pushed for Moosy's lynch. Now maybe you disagreed with this read, but you never said it was why you scumread marv; you said it was because he didn't do anything noteworthy. Which is false since he pushed Moosy i said a push worth pushing...obviously there's some subjectivity involved here he clearly started pushing moosy for voting for him then when off on moosy saying cool "scared" him...which just isn't anything worthwhile imo like even if moosy were scum, why would he be scared of cool? it's definitely not a scum slip and implies just what moosy said it implied...that moosy was calling cool scummy or scum in other words, no, i did not find that push noteworthy or worthy of marv as a player...i liked him voting for moosy cause i was scumreading moosy, nothing more. the sexy comment was mostly for his response to rayn's bitching and the vote, not the argument
I think it makes sense
|
On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said.
'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between
|
rsoultin stop posting this fucking thing. You could have town or scum motivation to put suspicions on marv, repeating this doesn't fucking matter. What's matter is if your read makes sense or not
|
On September 30 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:03 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said. 'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between i never said once about having no posts in between.
OK true. That was my interpretation of the case. Then all this talking about rsoultin townreading you earlier means nothing
|
On September 30 2015 23:07 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:03 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said. 'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between i never said once about having no posts in between. OK true. That was my interpretation of the case. Then all this talking about rsoultin townreading you earlier means nothing
EBWOP: means nothing for you ?
|
On September 30 2015 23:09 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:08 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:07 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:03 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said. 'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between i never said once about having no posts in between. OK true. That was my interpretation of the case. Then all this talking about rsoultin townreading you earlier means nothing the point of it was that she got a very strong townread on me and then about 10 players in the game (it is literally 10 players, i went from #2 towniest to #12 towniest) leapt ahead of me in the interim while i was pushing moosy or whatever i was doing. i.e. i don't believe the reevaluation for a moment except that the reason i was townreading you i thought could be wrong and disregarding that i didn't like the rest of your play there's nothing unbelievable about it
why didn't post this "the only thing marv did (Moosy push) is useless because of X X X" when you re evaluated ? Or did you ?
|
On September 30 2015 23:13 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:11 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:09 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 23:08 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:07 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:03 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said. 'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between i never said once about having no posts in between. OK true. That was my interpretation of the case. Then all this talking about rsoultin townreading you earlier means nothing the point of it was that she got a very strong townread on me and then about 10 players in the game (it is literally 10 players, i went from #2 towniest to #12 towniest) leapt ahead of me in the interim while i was pushing moosy or whatever i was doing. i.e. i don't believe the reevaluation for a moment except that the reason i was townreading you i thought could be wrong and disregarding that i didn't like the rest of your play there's nothing unbelievable about it why didn't post this "the only thing marv did (Moosy push) is useless because of X X X" when you re evaluated ? Or did you ? cause i didn't go through and just tick off why everything was useless? i went hey...has he done anything notable since the reaction to the votes? i can't even remember...that's a bad sign
mm that's not believable
how could marv go from top town to lynch candidate with the following reason: "marv did nothing notable"
without you checking how him pushing Moosy is not notable
|
On September 30 2015 23:26 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:21 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:13 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 23:11 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:09 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 23:08 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:07 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote:On September 30 2015 23:03 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:01 marvellosity wrote:
i don't understand how rsoultin townreading me earlier changes anything in the slightest about what i said. 'cause your case is based on the fact that she townread you, then scumread you when you made no posts in between i never said once about having no posts in between. OK true. That was my interpretation of the case. Then all this talking about rsoultin townreading you earlier means nothing the point of it was that she got a very strong townread on me and then about 10 players in the game (it is literally 10 players, i went from #2 towniest to #12 towniest) leapt ahead of me in the interim while i was pushing moosy or whatever i was doing. i.e. i don't believe the reevaluation for a moment except that the reason i was townreading you i thought could be wrong and disregarding that i didn't like the rest of your play there's nothing unbelievable about it why didn't post this "the only thing marv did (Moosy push) is useless because of X X X" when you re evaluated ? Or did you ? cause i didn't go through and just tick off why everything was useless? i went hey...has he done anything notable since the reaction to the votes? i can't even remember...that's a bad sign mm that's not believable how could marv go from top town to lynch candidate with the following reason: "marv did nothing notable" without you checking how him pushing Moosy is not notable because i didn't find it notable the first time i read it @.@
I thought you liked the Moosy vote, and that's why you posted sexy Marv! Going to check but I'm pretty sure you said that
|
you did:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 22:09 rsoultin wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 22:05 Rels wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 22:01 rsoultin wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 21:58 Rels wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:
[QUOTE]On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
in other words, no, i did not find that push noteworthy or worthy of marv as a player...i liked him voting for moosy cause i was scumreading moosy, nothing more. the sexy comment was mostly for his response to rayn's bitching and the vote, not the argument[/QUOTE]
you also said the "sexy Marv" was for the vote, not the push.
It is not believable. So in your timeline:
1 - marv votes Moosy
2 - rsoultin likes the vote and post "sexy Marv"
3 - rsoultin finds the push useless but doesn't say it
4 - rsoultin townreads Marv
5 - rsoultin scumreads Marv for not doing anything notable, but does not explain how the Moosy push is not notable
how the fuck do you congratulate marv for his vote and at the same time thinks his push is useless ? It's nonsense
|
Format:
you did:
On September 30 2015 22:09 rsoultin wrote:
in other words, no, i did not find that push noteworthy or worthy of marv as a player...i liked him voting for moosy cause i was scumreading moosy, nothing more. the sexy comment was mostly for his response to rayn's bitching and the vote, not the argument
you also said the "sexy Marv" was for the vote, not the push.
It is not believable. So in your timeline:
1 - marv votes Moosy
2 - rsoultin likes the vote and post "sexy Marv"
3 - rsoultin finds the push useless but doesn't say it
4 - rsoultin townreads Marv
5 - rsoultin scumreads Marv for not doing anything notable, but does not explain how the Moosy push is not notable
how the fuck do you congratulate marv for his vote and at the same time thinks his push is useless ? It's nonsense
|
because I realized you should have at least talked about marv's Moosy push when you re evaluated him, as it was the biggest thing he's done at that point
|
On September 30 2015 23:37 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:36 Rels wrote:
because I realized you should have at least talked about marv's Moosy push when you re evaluated him, as it was the biggest thing he's done at that point why?
because it was the biggest thing he's done at that point ???
|
On September 30 2015 23:40 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:39 Rels wrote:On September 30 2015 23:37 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 23:36 Rels wrote:
because I realized you should have at least talked about marv's Moosy push when you re evaluated him, as it was the biggest thing he's done at that point why? because it was the biggest thing he's done at that point ??? yeah but why do i have to talk about this specifically? if it's not notable why would i note it? lol ><
The only reason I find that weird is that you bothered to make "sexy Marv" post partly referring to it
|
On September 30 2015 23:39 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2015 23:37 rsoultin wrote:On September 30 2015 23:36 Rels wrote:
because I realized you should have at least talked about marv's Moosy push when you re evaluated him, as it was the biggest thing he's done at that point why? like, i say i have suspicions on so-and-so because i don't think he's done anything notable why do i need to tick off all the things i don't find notable? i was talking to damdy. i hadn't made a case. i didn't vote marv. i was trying to work out my reads if i made a case, sure...i could see this argument though i'm still not sure that i'd actually do it. i'm not really a case builder
mm
it makes sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
