EPTls he says he read the thread but he obviously didn't which is weird of him.
I'd put GB over him
Battle of the Drams Mafia - Page 62
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
ls he says he read the thread but he obviously didn't which is weird of him. I'd put GB over him | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:05 Damdred wrote: Tbh moosey GB is strange a bit sideline and only focusing on certain things. His read on me taking such a sudden shift because rsoultin said so is weird also. ls he says he read the thread but he obviously didn't which is weird of him. I'd put GB over him The thing is that GB is playing totally different than the scum games I had with him. In them he was super ADHD and bouncing everywhere and all over the place. Here he seems more collected and focused. I do admit a lot of his posts, especially the banter ones, are forced and I did point it out before. hm... | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:05 sicklucker wrote: You're making a ton of claims and assumptions without checking your facts. I've continually told you the actual facts, and you are ignoring them entirely with unsupported claims.Tref you made a post 1 hour before my 20 hour return. im not sure how much you posted but im sure it was alot more then me. Most of my posts were at the very start so unless you were only around for the first 4 hours of the game are posts should have overlapped. alot.. Your filter My filter On September 29 2015 09:47 Trfel wrote: My last post before leaving the thread for quite some time, at 20:47 EDT on the 28th.It's okay, you're mafia anyway XD On September 30 2015 09:35 Trfel wrote: My next post. At this point I had not read the thread. The time here is 20:35 EDT on the 29th, which makes for 23 hours and 48 minutes away from the thread.Rsoultin, why do you think that I am town? I don't understand that read at all XD On September 29 2015 10:34 sicklucker wrote: This is the first post I marked as suspicious for you. This post was made at 21:34 EDT on the 28th, after I left. Your scumread of J Roc was posted after this post as well.Sometimes you dont want to be town. yes I believe I have been playing quite alot for a day 1 Got it? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 29 2015 22:45 Rels wrote: Let me help you out a bit. Skype conversation with rsoultin, about an hour before the game started.I agree it's stupid. It is the most likely explanation though; how do you explain town Trfel keeping his rsoultin scumread even after admitting his first reason was bad ? I mean, his first reason was so bad I dismissed the post as a joke. The only explanation for town Trfel to do that is if he is joking with rsoultin, like getting her angry on purpose for humour. "you know i'm actually going to lynch you day 1 ^^" "i feel like if i actually push you all day during the game it would get on your nerves eventually but then again you're going to roll mafia, so maybe that's not so bad XD" | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
On September 30 2015 12:41 sicklucker wrote: Dear trefel dont try to spin this Here you specifically state you are not trying to read me lolz 1 hour ago (when your the leading wagon) out of no where you bring my name up almost as if your seeing if there is any interest in lynching me and not you. THESE ARE YOUR ONLY MENTIOINS OF ME IN YOUR FILTER BEFORE THAT. You cant make up lies like "well i was not in the thread" you had 30 some hours lol like this post is all you need. That first post was your only mention of me in your filter. saying you were not around is at least an excuse if not a blantant lie. Then you try to spin votes on me when you have all the votes | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
Hope that helps you!][/b] - trefel | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:20 sicklucker wrote: Oh that? You've been talking about that this entire time?TREFEL I QUOTED YOUR OWN POST WHERE YOU SAID YOUR NOT TRYING TO READ ME. how can you dispute this? I'm not sure what the right word for this is? Joke doesn't quite fit? I was trying to communicate something by saying something else... Basically I was saying that I wasn't going to make extra effort to try to figure out your alignment at that time. Well, there were things that stood out to me, and plus the time changed. You actually expect me to not try and read you all game because of an off-hand comment I made right at the start? And I even said possible exception, meaning that I may try to specifically look at you anyway? Like that's simply not a lie, and even if it was, it wouldn't be important at all... | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:31 sicklucker wrote: So you're saying that you were sort of around while you were gone from the thread?11pm to 9pm but even before that i was barely around | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:32 sicklucker wrote: Let's see, it's been three and a half hours since I came back, and I'm still trying to read the thread. I'm a very slow player. So yes, I start posting about things before I fully catch up.like your still trying to make excuses. you dont go back and read the thread that already happened? thats what I do everytime i come to the thread and I go back and quote things that interest me. do you not do this? do you just enter the thread ignore it and type things? My point is that you were gone for a reasonably long period of time. So when I say that I was gone for a reasonably long period of time, why do you immediately insist that I am lying? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On September 30 2015 13:36 sicklucker wrote: It doesn't matter if I leave one second before you do. If you make an important post in that one second, I don't see it.both of are posts before today trefel were all on sept 28 around the same time. Thats why you were rubbing me the wrong way even before this you never tried to read me dispute us being in the thread together. It seems we left at about the same time as well I have proven this, with time stamps and quotes. I don't know how you can possibly not understand this. It's so hard to see this coming from town, but I haven't played with sicklucker for so long... Sicklucker, I'm going to ignore you for a while. This isn't going anywhere. | ||
| ||
while waiting to see if anyone would take the bait, you're right. but your little theory falls apart because you assume that i'd for some god-awful reason not link this to the other myriad times you did it and at worst null read you for it
