|
Actually, ES, give me a holler when you're back. I want to know how you went from this:
On October 12 2015 09:15 Eversince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 09:08 The Shining wrote:
I've never been a fan of day one or particularly good at it in these types of setups. I prefer VCAs and filter dives after the first flip. Unfortunately not playing D1 puts me at risk of being mislynched so I've tried to play but every time I do so, someone calls my posts bad so I resort to one liners and quips. I'm sorry if that's taking a toll on you, OO.
ES, I'm torn. On the one hand, I'm starting to get a sick satisfaction from your tunnel on me but on the other hand, Marv is one of my actual scumread. Why u do this to me??
Marv with a one page filter is not town Marv. He has the potential to lead and carry town when he actually cares about the game. He even raised suspicion on me when no one else would early in my last scum game. At the risk of you telling me I'm just reiterating what's already been said(Celestials post), it just doesn't look like town Marv.
His entrance is weak. His catch up post gets us nowhere(he's in love with you apparently) and he defends Gumdrop strangely, I.e. gumdrop does Gumdrop things when literally everyone else has Gum as scum or plynch. He says SLs reaction to you was totally beyond him, but doesn't say whether that makes SL scum or not. So another useless post.
And he apparently doesn't have any opinions outside of what I've just summarized, or else he would have offered them, which means he's not interested in solving the game. Not interested in solving the game = scum. He even said so himself last game. This is actually good. Marv has done squat all this game. Your beat up over the fact I'm "tunneling'" because you can't be brought to say hi? I haven't got a care about pursuing opinions from you. You'll either give em' or you won't.
Where you are agreeing with me to me being refuse again. Make up your mind, ya?
And rereading it, i dont get why you would say you don't care about pursuing opinions from me right after you ask me for one and even agree with it. This makes absolutely no sense. If I'm trash or scum, you shouldn't agree with me, nor should you be asking my opinion and then subsequently saying you don't care about my opinion.
TLDR: "give me opinion on Marv->I agree about Marv->I don't care about pursuing your opinions->Shining you're refuse"
???????
|
On October 12 2015 09:49 MoosyDoosy wrote:
-Celestial- is right. You two are being dumb. This is town on town.
This is how TL Mafia is played nowadays. Anger and shitfights. Remember last game? Marv RSo shitfight. Rayn RSo shitfight. GB so angry it made him conftown.
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum.
=D
|
Lmao Cel I'll forgive you this time but my smiley at the end was meant to indicate that that entire post was me being sarcastic. No need to take me serious. I actually hate this recent meta thing where anger = town.
|
On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D
Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e
On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him.
But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF.
|
On October 12 2015 10:18 -Celestial- wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:17 MoosyDoosy wrote:
-Celestial-, are you a boy or girl? Sorry if you answered this earlier. I'm a boy. But I'm not too bothered what people refer to me as. X-D
Oops my b
|
On October 12 2015 10:17 -Celestial- wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:12 The Shining wrote:
I actually hate this recent meta thing where anger = town. Yeah its pretty easy to just fake it really. But its hard to decide which is which. In any case...anyone got any more thoughts or are we just going to be waiting on seeing if marvellosity turns up? Because if he really doesn't come back then this might get awkward. He hasn't voted so realistically he could be looking at a modkill, so it'd be a wasted lynch. :-\
Unfortunately that is the problem with people deciding not to play. And we have two currently not playing in Gum and Marv. We can only do so much while they are still around uselessly
|
On October 12 2015 10:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Can you point out these logical counterarguments?
Regardless of whether i agree with them or not, his point regarding getting both of his partners killed if my scumlist is correct is a good one. And his OO vote was something i did overlook when i scummed him, although i did explain how he could just switdh votes. But he did come off of OO pretty easily now that i look at it...
Like i said. I still dont have warm fuzzies about him, my vote is still on him but it also makes perfectly good sense to lynch the guy who did nothing and then fucked off when most here know his potential as town. I only havent switched to marv because Fecal did, which means I'm wrong on one of them but I'm still hoping Marv can show up and clear it up. But at least FF is responding to pressure
|
On October 12 2015 10:39 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 09:13 Fecalfeast wrote:
OO's recent posts are good and I like them.
##unvote
##vote marvellosity
might as well lynch the obvious... one wait that wasn't intentional
shining you just called me out for saying moosey bused his whole team, then you say that mafia's wincon is to survive? By that logic, town's wincon is also to survive because if enough townies die the game ends... So how do you currently read ObviousOne? Can you point out the posts from ObviousOne that you liked in particular and explain why?
This is why im liking the Moosy for town.
|
On October 12 2015 10:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:43 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 12 2015 10:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:35 Fecalfeast wrote:
In his post he said I was scummy with OO and marv. Both people I have said I'm ok with killing. I was saying that seems like a bad strategy. But you just said you didn't read the post... hur dur oh noes you totally caught me wow such semantics I literally said "I'm looking for my name" which, to me, implied that I was going to see how he read me. Seeing that I was beign read scum I looked at who else he called scum. I didn't even read WHY he called OO and marv scum okie that's what I expected although there's no reason to be so sarcastic over it. Please answer my other questions bb. @Shining, was there a slight intention to pocket me in that list post of yours? Because something about your segment on me rubs me the wrong way and I normally do like rubbing. Also how you're saying you like me as town.
This must be payback for me accusing you of pocketing me last game. Well played.
Nope. My pockets aren't deep enough to fit a Moose. I was just strengthening my town read on you. Considering you're not universally townread, I wouldn't have much reason to pocket you if I were scum, anyway. Thanks for asking though 
|
On October 12 2015 10:45 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:40 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Can you point out these logical counterarguments? Regardless of whether i agree with them or not, his point regarding getting both of his partners killed if my scumlist is correct is a good one. And his OO vote was something i did overlook when i scummed him, although i did explain how he could just switdh votes. But he did come off of OO pretty easily now that i look at it... Like i said. I still dont have warm fuzzies about him, my vote is still on him but it also makes perfectly good sense to lynch the guy who did nothing and then fucked off when most here know his potential as town. I only havent switched to marv because Fecal did, which means I'm wrong on one of them but I'm still hoping Marv can show up and clear it up. But at least FF is responding to pressure "I know I'm wrong on one" how do you know you're not wrong on both? If marv shows up and bleeds town how does that make me scum? Yeah yeah moose I'm doing the thing
Because I'm just too good to be wrong on every single scumread I have.
Realistically I could be wrong on both but I just don't think I am. Him showing up and bleeding town doesn't make you scum, though. The points I've brought against you make you scum. Lelelelele
|
On October 12 2015 10:49 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:43 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 12 2015 10:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:35 Fecalfeast wrote:
In his post he said I was scummy with OO and marv. Both people I have said I'm ok with killing. I was saying that seems like a bad strategy. But you just said you didn't read the post... hur dur oh noes you totally caught me wow such semantics I literally said "I'm looking for my name" which, to me, implied that I was going to see how he read me. Seeing that I was beign read scum I looked at who else he called scum. I didn't even read WHY he called OO and marv scum okie that's what I expected although there's no reason to be so sarcastic over it. Please answer my other questions bb. @Shining, was there a slight intention to pocket me in that list post of yours? Because something about your segment on me rubs me the wrong way and I normally do like rubbing. Also how you're saying you like me as town. This must be payback for me accusing you of pocketing me last game. Well played. Nope. My pockets aren't deep enough to fit a Moose. I was just strengthening my town read on you. Considering you're not universally townread, I wouldn't have much reason to pocket you if I were scum, anyway. Thanks for asking though
Also what other response did you expect? What was the purpose of that post, Moosy? Do you think scum would ever openly admit to a pocketing attempt? How about you explain what exactly about my list post made you think I was pocketing? What sentence or line?
|
On October 12 2015 10:54 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:53 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:45 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 12 2015 10:40 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Can you point out these logical counterarguments? Regardless of whether i agree with them or not, his point regarding getting both of his partners killed if my scumlist is correct is a good one. And his OO vote was something i did overlook when i scummed him, although i did explain how he could just switdh votes. But he did come off of OO pretty easily now that i look at it... Like i said. I still dont have warm fuzzies about him, my vote is still on him but it also makes perfectly good sense to lynch the guy who did nothing and then fucked off when most here know his potential as town. I only havent switched to marv because Fecal did, which means I'm wrong on one of them but I'm still hoping Marv can show up and clear it up. But at least FF is responding to pressure "I know I'm wrong on one" how do you know you're not wrong on both? If marv shows up and bleeds town how does that make me scum? Yeah yeah moose I'm doing the thing Because I'm just too good to be wrong on every single scumread I have. Realistically I could be wrong on both but I just don't think I am. Him showing up and bleeding town doesn't make you scum, though. The points I've brought against you make you scum. Lelelelele So how do you read FF? null? town? scum?
Is it not obvious I still think FF is scum? My vote is still on him and I continue to say he gives me no warm fuzzies. The only reason I think Marv is a better lynch is because it plays so perfectly into his scum meta and therefore gives us a higher chance of a scumflip because I could very well be wrong on FF. I just don't think I am.
|
On October 12 2015 11:04 MoosyDoosy wrote:So Shining is voting for marv because he thinks marv is more scummy than FF although he believes that both are scum. And FF is voting for marv because he changed his read on ObviousOne. @FecalFeast, just one last question. Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:56 Fecalfeast wrote:
And to commit to a read I am now calling OO towny What is with this post? Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:35 Fecalfeast wrote:
In his post he said I was scummy with OO and marv. Both people I have said I'm ok with killing. I was saying that seems like a bad strategy.
Welp you're getting knocked down a notch on my town list. I'm voting FF, not Marv. Because meta is unreliable but Marv is playing into his scum meta, whereas FF has given me reasons to scum him.
|
On October 12 2015 11:06 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:04 MoosyDoosy wrote:So Shining is voting for marv because he thinks marv is more scummy than FF although he believes that both are scum. And FF is voting for marv because he changed his read on ObviousOne. @FecalFeast, just one last question. On October 12 2015 10:56 Fecalfeast wrote:
And to commit to a read I am now calling OO towny What is with this post? On October 12 2015 10:35 Fecalfeast wrote:
In his post he said I was scummy with OO and marv. Both people I have said I'm ok with killing. I was saying that seems like a bad strategy. I said previously that I would kill OO and marv, reads change. Which actually kinda fits shining's narrative where I can change my vote. Oh shit I'm thinking about how I appear again, better pretend I don't notice things like that or I'll get called scum
Meh you changed your vote from one possible scummer to another. Your sarcasm does you no favors, either.
|
On October 12 2015 11:10 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Then your vote is on FF when you think marv is a better lynch? You're not making sense right now. ##unvote
##vote The Shining
Because I don't want to vote with my scumread on another of my scumread when my first scumread has given me reasons to scum him.
But w.e do what you must. Gj on not paying attention, you didnt even know who I was voting. And yes Marv is probably the better lynch because he fucked off, whereas FF is playing but I have actual reasons to scum him. I'm following my personal read and gut over some meta bullshit because it can very well be wrong. But FF playing and posting could come from a town perspective but quite frankly idc anymore.
Everyone can keep scumming me all they want and eat a big fat...Snickers when I flip. We all know what I actually wanna say but I don't feel like getting warned.
|
On October 12 2015 11:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
Possibly, I'm about 40 mins from closing shop however. Do you have a case or something other than compiling your filter? I'll read when I get home Just a brief summary but I'm writing up something right now. Basically he said everything on marv was perfect and worked out and said marv was a better lynch than FecalFeast. So I asked him how he read FecalFeast and he said scum. This meant that marv had to be more scummy to Shining than FecalFeast, but Shining kept his vote on FecalFeast while basically saying everything on marv was perfect. There's no reason for him to keep his vote on FecalFeast when he said that marv was a better lynch. I actually had my first suspicions because in our last game where he was scum, Shining made an excuse to switch his vote onto the popular wagon. Here, marv is turning out to be the popular wagon. Also, the fact that he's so conscious about his last game with me is strange in and of itself.
Here Marv is turning out to be the popular wagon and IM NOT FUCKING VOTING MARV. so how does that argument make any sort of sense? And all I said was its a perfect META case. I've also said meta can be INACCURATE which is why I didn't switch.
The fact that I'm conscious of past games is NAI so blow it out your ass, bro. I'm also conscious of my first ever game here which was almost a year ago and Celestial brought it up in this game. I guess I'm scum for that, too, right?
|
On October 12 2015 11:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:24 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:10 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote:
It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Then your vote is on FF when you think marv is a better lynch? You're not making sense right now. ##unvote
##vote The Shining Because I don't want to vote with my scumread on another of my scumread when my first scumread has given me reasons to scum him. But w.e do what you must. Gj on not paying attention, you didnt even know who I was voting. And yes Marv is probably the better lynch because he fucked off, whereas FF is playing but I have actual reasons to scum him. I'm following my personal read and gut over some meta bullshit because it can very well be wrong. But FF playing and posting could come from a town perspective but quite frankly idc anymore. Everyone can keep scumming me all they want and eat a big fat...Snickers when I flip. We all know what I actually wanna say but I don't feel like getting warned. Yes, this just does not make sense. Why would you say that the point on marv is perfect and that you're "warming up to" his lynch and that he is the better lynch while keeping your vote on FecalFeast? I also dislike how you're coming up with an excuse to scum read marv too.
And you're not reading the thread. Fuck my TR on you, you're scum or dumbtown.. How am I making an excuse to scum read Marv when he was scum to me from my very first read post?? I even explained why when ES asked about it. And I obviously said those things because I was CONSIDERING switching but decided to stay on FF, my main scumread.
|
On October 12 2015 11:34 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
Possibly, I'm about 40 mins from closing shop however. Do you have a case or something other than compiling your filter? I'll read when I get home Just a brief summary but I'm writing up something right now. Basically he said everything on marv was perfect and worked out and said marv was a better lynch than FecalFeast. So I asked him how he read FecalFeast and he said scum. This meant that marv had to be more scummy to Shining than FecalFeast, but Shining kept his vote on FecalFeast while basically saying everything on marv was perfect. There's no reason for him to keep his vote on FecalFeast when he said that marv was a better lynch. I actually had my first suspicions because in our last game where he was scum, Shining made an excuse to switch his vote onto the popular wagon. Here, marv is turning out to be the popular wagon. Also, the fact that he's so conscious about his last game with me is strange in and of itself. Here Marv is turning out to be the popular wagon and IM NOT FUCKING VOTING MARV. so how does that argument make any sort of sense? And all I said was its a perfect META case. I've also said meta can be INACCURATE which is why I didn't switch. The fact that I'm conscious of past games is NAI so blow it out your ass, bro. I'm also conscious of my first ever game here which was almost a year ago and Celestial brought it up in this game. I guess I'm scum for that, too, right?
Oh and lets not forget! Moosy just said I'm strangely conscious about last game in the same post HE MENTIONS SOMETHING ABOUT LAST GAME REGARDING ME. Guess I'm not the only one conscious of last game, hm? Hmmmmmmmm??
|
On October 12 2015 11:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:48 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:34 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
Possibly, I'm about 40 mins from closing shop however. Do you have a case or something other than compiling your filter? I'll read when I get home Just a brief summary but I'm writing up something right now. Basically he said everything on marv was perfect and worked out and said marv was a better lynch than FecalFeast. So I asked him how he read FecalFeast and he said scum. This meant that marv had to be more scummy to Shining than FecalFeast, but Shining kept his vote on FecalFeast while basically saying everything on marv was perfect. There's no reason for him to keep his vote on FecalFeast when he said that marv was a better lynch. I actually had my first suspicions because in our last game where he was scum, Shining made an excuse to switch his vote onto the popular wagon. Here, marv is turning out to be the popular wagon. Also, the fact that he's so conscious about his last game with me is strange in and of itself. Here Marv is turning out to be the popular wagon and IM NOT FUCKING VOTING MARV. so how does that argument make any sort of sense? And all I said was its a perfect META case. I've also said meta can be INACCURATE which is why I didn't switch. The fact that I'm conscious of past games is NAI so blow it out your ass, bro. I'm also conscious of my first ever game here which was almost a year ago and Celestial brought it up in this game. I guess I'm scum for that, too, right? Oh and lets not forget! Moosy just said I'm strangely conscious about last game in the same post HE MENTIONS SOMETHING ABOUT LAST GAME REGARDING ME. Guess I'm not the only one conscious of last game, hm? Hmmmmmmmm?? That's not even the main post I'm making against you. That's actually what kind of sparked my suspicion on you which led me to go on a long spiral of questioning you.
Nor is it my main counterpoint. But its the only one you decided to respond to. Why is that? It's funny that that is what sparked your suspicion, though, as it means you were aware of it from the beginning of my posting which means you're just as conscious of last game. So please explain to me how that is a scum tell. I'll give you a hint. It isn't.
|
On October 12 2015 11:52 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:47 Eversince wrote:
Bear with me also. I was super mad earlier. I took a rest, still wakin' up from it.
Will catch up, but it might take me a min'. Hello Eversince. May I convince you for a Shining lynch?
Lynch this fucking guy, omg. He doesn't know I voted FF, not Marv. He doesn't know I was scumming Marv from the beginning, not making reasons up to scum Marv. And he doesn't even fucking known me and ES had a shit fight that led to her voting me.
Here's a hint Moosy. She's ALREADY VOTING ME.
Not reading thread and flinging shit on me. Ya scum,deffo, got em coach
##Unvote
##Vote: MoosyDoosy
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
