On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
On September 01 2015 19:04 Palmar wrote:
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.
I'm going to explain why this post makes no sense now. (And in the end it makes Vivax mafia).
There is a logical error here by Vivax.
The truth value of the claim between Trfel and I does not change depending on when or how we claim it. It's either true, or it's false. There's only two options here for Vivax.
So how could the mason situation possibly have been resolved yesterday? Is he implying that if we claimed when someone (maybe himself I think?) demanded it, then we would have been confirmed? Because that is a super strange way of thinking about this.
Is he maybe implying that he would have accepted the claim then proceeded to lynch one of us to confirm it? Again, that would have been both stupid and unwarranted.
I'm going to paraphrase Vivax's post to get the message even clearer, there are two important statements in here:
1) We could have resolved the mason claim yesterday.
2) No one is sure whether the mason claim is true.
I listed (above) the only two ways I believe these sentence can be true together. Either if Vivax believes that:
a) Palmar claims when he demands it = MASONS CONFIRMED
b) Trfel claims when Palmar is about to be lynched = MASONS SCUMMY
This makes no sense because a) is just retarded if he has ANY reason to suspect us. If the ONLY reason Vivax believes we're scummy is the timing of the claim, then he's not considering eveyrthing that had happened in the game up until then.
I hope this makes sense, but I'm actually really sure about this. The post is illogical and clearly shows Vivax is saying something that is out of touch with reality.
I'll sheep people on KSC because I think he's mafia, but I think Vivax is the prime lynch today.