|
On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.
:rolleyes:
You'll have to do better than that.
I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now.
|
On August 20 2015 07:30 Fidei86 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.
:rolleyes:
You'll have to do better than that. I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now.
I don't have a problem with you not reading the lurkers either way, because, frankly, it's mostly true.
The fact of the matter is that there are way too many "scum leans" in your list. Narrow it down: who is scummier and why?
|
On August 20 2015 07:26 The Shining wrote:
the epic quote fails make it hard to know o.o
if ur asking about tube going for easy votes, he uses chezinu rule to scum geript and all geript says is "it only works if the person scumming geript doesn't know chezinu" so he immediately backs off. where's the proof? im not even familiar with the chezinu rule. but chezinus my boy so its all good.
then he jumps on the fidei wagon and says he's not reading. there was a lot of effort in that read. and he stated the only real rng vote on fidei was ritokys. I disproved that with my flawless logicx. no scumhunting here, just a BS post about chezinu rule that he didn't even try to investigate and an effortless vote on ritokys lynchwagon.
boom. town mvp right here
This is actually a pretty good post I think.
|
fidei I just contributed a case and vote on tubesock. he's voting you for Nada. vote scum with me. ez game ez life
|
Tubesock
Ruxxar
Wave
Yamato
Initial scumlist.
|
Obi that list isn't very good.
|
|
|
On August 20 2015 07:39 WaveofShadow wrote:
Obi that list isn't very good.
Neither are you but we make do.
:ooooooooo
|
On August 20 2015 07:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:30 Fidei86 wrote:On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.
:rolleyes:
You'll have to do better than that. I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now. I don't have a problem with you not reading the lurkers either way, because, frankly, it's mostly true. The fact of the matter is that there are way too many "scum leans" in your list. Narrow it down: who is scummier and why?
There are, by my count, five people on my 'scum lean' list (excluding lurkers, obv). There were four mafia in Himalayas, and there were 17 players in that game. There are 21 here, so four or five mafia sounds about right (anyone with more game balancing experience care to weigh in?). Ergo my scum list is probably there or thereabouts in terms of length. Obviously it is pretty unlikely that I just called the entire scum team accurately in my first post of reads (though the post-game cred would be pretty astonishing).
I'm not sure whether any of my scum reads are stronger than any others. It is early. I would probably vote for Ritoky over the others, just because of how different he is playing to usual. But there's a way to go in the day yet, and I'm hoping things firm up a little. Sorry if that's wishy-washy, it's just where I am right now.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On August 20 2015 07:44 Fidei86 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 07:30 Fidei86 wrote:On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.
:rolleyes:
You'll have to do better than that. I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now. I don't have a problem with you not reading the lurkers either way, because, frankly, it's mostly true. The fact of the matter is that there are way too many "scum leans" in your list. Narrow it down: who is scummier and why? There are, by my count, five people on my 'scum lean' list (excluding lurkers, obv). There were four mafia in Himalayas, and there were 17 players in that game. There are 21 here, so four or five mafia sounds about right (anyone with more game balancing experience care to weigh in?). Ergo my scum list is probably there or thereabouts in terms of length. Obviously it is pretty unlikely that I just called the entire scum team accurately in my first post of reads (though the post-game cred would be pretty astonishing). I'm not sure whether any of my scum reads are stronger than any others. It is early. I would probably vote for Ritoky over the others, just because of how different he is playing to usual. But there's a way to go in the day yet, and I'm hoping things firm up a little. Sorry if that's wishy-washy, it's just where I am right now.
gee i wonder why people are playing differently than usual
|
On August 20 2015 07:40 The Shining wrote:
because ur on it wave?
Well mostly because it's zero effort.
I'm aware that's sort of hypocritical but here we are.
|
On August 20 2015 07:44 Fidei86 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 07:30 Fidei86 wrote:On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.
:rolleyes:
You'll have to do better than that. I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now. I don't have a problem with you not reading the lurkers either way, because, frankly, it's mostly true. The fact of the matter is that there are way too many "scum leans" in your list. Narrow it down: who is scummier and why? There are, by my count, five people on my 'scum lean' list (excluding lurkers, obv). There were four mafia in Himalayas, and there were 17 players in that game. There are 21 here, so four or five mafia sounds about right (anyone with more game balancing experience care to weigh in?). Ergo my scum list is probably there or thereabouts in terms of length. Obviously it is pretty unlikely that I just called the entire scum team accurately in my first post of reads (though the post-game cred would be pretty astonishing). I'm not sure whether any of my scum reads are stronger than any others. It is early. I would probably vote for Ritoky over the others, just because of how different he is playing to usual. But there's a way to go in the day yet, and I'm hoping things firm up a little. Sorry if that's wishy-washy, it's just where I am right now.
So are the lurkers actual scumleans or just nullreads?
Or are you just using the term "scumlean" to indicate someone you would lynch for lurking?
|
On August 20 2015 07:49 WaveofShadow wrote:Well mostly because it's zero effort. I'm aware that's sort of hypocritical but here we are.
I prefer games to be easy like that.
|
On August 20 2015 07:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:00 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 06:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 06:54 ruXxar wrote:
All the trolls are out rejoicing thinking tonight is going to be a great lynch on me.
...
WRONG.
tonight we lynch scum.
If you want to lynch scum, lynch obiwan.
His blood runs red.
All comments, no reads, no interest in solving the game.
##Unvote
##Vote obiwan I'm so happy with my vote on you. You have no idea. I especially like how you came to the conclusion that you should vote for me: On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain. On August 19 2015 22:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ima vote him anyway though. Nice try scum boi. Good job taking two posts before I came to the conclusion that you were town, but then ignoring the ones where I actually came to some sort of conclusion and then flipped that read when you called me mafia for garbage reasons.
You managed to be the biggest waffle in the history of ever.
Let me write you the whole story of your alignment indicative posts on me:
On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain.
On August 19 2015 22:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ima vote him anyway though.
On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him.
On August 20 2015 02:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 02:35 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him. Mafia trying to get town credit. I changed my mind. 100% mafia
#1) You are scum for voting me even though you admitted you were wrong.
Easy to join the bandwagon when Breshke, HTS and Rels already led the way.
#2) You are scum for having no reads. What you said about me are words without impact. It does not qualify as a read. You make bantering comments afraid of committing one way or the other.
#3) You are scum for having no interest in solving the game. Your comments lead nowhere, and are as neutral as possible, sniffing out thread sentiment and trying to follow the flow of safe harbor.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On August 20 2015 07:52 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 07:00 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 06:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 06:54 ruXxar wrote:
All the trolls are out rejoicing thinking tonight is going to be a great lynch on me.
...
WRONG.
tonight we lynch scum.
If you want to lynch scum, lynch obiwan.
His blood runs red.
All comments, no reads, no interest in solving the game.
##Unvote
##Vote obiwan I'm so happy with my vote on you. You have no idea. I especially like how you came to the conclusion that you should vote for me: On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain. On August 19 2015 22:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ima vote him anyway though. Nice try scum boi. Good job taking two posts before I came to the conclusion that you were town, but then ignoring the ones where I actually came to some sort of conclusion and then flipped that read when you called me mafia for garbage reasons. You managed to be the biggest waffle in the history of ever. Let me write you the whole story of your alignment indicative posts on me: Show nested quote +On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain. Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him. Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 02:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 02:35 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him. Mafia trying to get town credit. I changed my mind. 100% mafia #1) You are scum for voting me even though you admitted you were wrong. Easy to join the bandwagon when Breshke, HTS and Rels already led the way. #2) You are scum for having no reads. What you said about me are words without impact. It does not qualify as a read. You make bantering comments afraid of committing one way or the other. #3) You are scum for having no interest in solving the game. Your comments lead nowhere, and are as neutral as possible, sniffing out thread sentiment and trying to follow the flow of safe harbor.
in fairness i'm town and I have no interest in solving the game here.
|
Shining--Very meh. Supposedly in character but no good recognition. Would lynch.
Rels--Super useless. Would lynch.
HtS--Has a singular good point (re: Ruxxar/LS), but most of filter is blah. Would lynch.
Fido--IDK what to think of him. There's mixed points to be had, but I like his approach to reading the game and that makes me think he's probably town.
Wave--Everytime I think I have him figured out, I'm wrong. I'm just giong to pretend that he's flipped town and have fun with him while we're alive because I don't get to play with him much. <3 wubby.
yamato--super duper useless. would lynch.
Breshke--98% certain he's town. I could be wrong, but i really doubt it. I've had a good meta read on him for a while.
ruxxxar--longest filter so far, hops around and says stupid shit like he has the past couple town games, so he's probably town. But his stupid shit does seem worse than normal. I don't think he's a good lynch today though.
Damdred--not town, but not mafia. I'll look at him more when he's had time to post oetherwise.
JudgeJudy--ok posts, half flavor/fluff half content. Doesn't look terrible. townpile.
OWS--don't care can't read worth a shit
ritoky--Blazinghand and exceptionally useless. would lynch.
VA--has said and done nothing useful despite apparently being marv. would lynch.
Ticktock--He hasn't said anything I've really liked. Plus he apparently rolled me. I think that me and BH would be two of the rolls most likely to be mafia in this game. Mainly because the two of us are known far more for our mafia play than our town play. Would lynch.
Tubesock--Exceptionally meh.
FF--He's probably like VE which is probably a town role. But there's nothing redeeming in his filter plus there's the Chezinu rule so he needs to die.
LT--Would lynch. I've played with him some IRL and he doesn't feel like his town LT self. it doesn't transfer over entirely, but I still don't like him.
Beneather--MIA modkill
Kelsier--super useless. Trolls people. not posted 1 redeeming thing. He's a good shot for scum. Would lynch.
So what's the point of all of this. Well if you notice, there are exceptionally few townreads here. Like grow the fuck up and grab your nuts and make yourselves towny if you're town. I don't care if you play in character or not, but we have <24 hours to lynch someone and I can't even find like 5 super stronk townreads. There's no way we get a good lynch off if this holds. So don't bitch when I end up pushing to kill one of you fuckers because you're not being towny. Step up and play.
|
On August 20 2015 07:52 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 07:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 07:00 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 06:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 06:54 ruXxar wrote:
All the trolls are out rejoicing thinking tonight is going to be a great lynch on me.
...
WRONG.
tonight we lynch scum.
If you want to lynch scum, lynch obiwan.
His blood runs red.
All comments, no reads, no interest in solving the game.
##Unvote
##Vote obiwan I'm so happy with my vote on you. You have no idea. I especially like how you came to the conclusion that you should vote for me: On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain. On August 19 2015 22:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ima vote him anyway though. Nice try scum boi. Good job taking two posts before I came to the conclusion that you were town, but then ignoring the ones where I actually came to some sort of conclusion and then flipped that read when you called me mafia for garbage reasons. You managed to be the biggest waffle in the history of ever. Let me write you the whole story of your alignment indicative posts on me: Show nested quote +On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain. Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him. Show nested quote +On August 20 2015 02:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On August 20 2015 02:35 ruXxar wrote:On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him. Mafia trying to get town credit. I changed my mind. 100% mafia #1) You are scum for voting me even though you admitted you were wrong. Easy to join the bandwagon when Breshke, HTS and Rels already led the way. #2) You are scum for having no reads. What you said about me are words without impact. It does not qualify as a read. You make bantering comments afraid of committing one way or the other. #3) You are scum for having no interest in solving the game. Your comments lead nowhere, and are as neutral as possible, sniffing out thread sentiment and trying to follow the flow of safe harbor.
Shut up idiot.
|
Inclined to townread geript for his last post.
Specifically, the whole bit on "it's time to sack up and play" seemed kinda towny and is the exact kind of thing people need to be saying right now.
|
On August 20 2015 07:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Neither are you but we make do. :ooooooooo
![[image loading]](http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/michael-jordan-laugh.gif)
|
I should probably respond to rux's post anyways:
1) I changed my read on you because you came up with garbage reasons to call me mafia. Other people actually voting you is irrelevant towards this point and you bringing it up means nothing.
2) I have reads. You saying they have no impact is meaningless.
3) You are simply wrong about me "not having interest in solving the game." This is nothing more than a plot-spackle reason people throw into their reads to make them sound smarter than they really are. The best case you'd ever be able to come up with is "he isn't doing anything," which isn't even true anymore because, shock and surprise, I have a scumlist and reads and I'm doing stuff.
You can push as hard as you want but you have no case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
