[M][T] The New Personality Mafia - Page 31

On August 20 2015 07:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Scum lean on 9 people."
Really.

:rolleyes:

You'll have to do better than that.

On August 20 2015 07:30 Fidei86 wrote:


I see no reason to town read any of the players I listed as lurkers - all have been simply spamming one-liners or otherwise not contributing. I'm sure that some will start contributing once the usual "omg spam/roleplay" phase of d1 comes to an end (which it seems to be), but I'm commenting on things as I see them now.

On August 20 2015 07:26 The Shining wrote:
the epic quote fails make it hard to know o.o

if ur asking about tube going for easy votes, he uses chezinu rule to scum geript and all geript says is "it only works if the person scumming geript doesn't know chezinu" so he immediately backs off. where's the proof? im not even familiar with the chezinu rule. but chezinus my boy so its all good.

then he jumps on the fidei wagon and says he's not reading. there was a lot of effort in that read. and he stated the only real rng vote on fidei was ritokys. I disproved that with my flawless logicx. no scumhunting here, just a BS post about chezinu rule that he didn't even try to investigate and an effortless vote on ritokys lynchwagon.

boom. town mvp right here

On August 20 2015 07:39 WaveofShadow wrote:
Obi that list isn't very good.

On August 20 2015 07:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


I don't have a problem with you not reading the lurkers either way, because, frankly, it's mostly true.
The fact of the matter is that there are way too many "scum leans" in your list. Narrow it down: who is scummier and why?

On August 20 2015 07:44 Fidei86 wrote:

There are, by my count, five people on my 'scum lean' list (excluding lurkers, obv). There were four mafia in Himalayas, and there were 17 players in that game. There are 21 here, so four or five mafia sounds about right (anyone with more game balancing experience care to weigh in?). Ergo my scum list is probably there or thereabouts in terms of length. Obviously it is pretty unlikely that I just called the entire scum team accurately in my first post of reads (though the post-game cred would be pretty astonishing).

I'm not sure whether any of my scum reads are stronger than any others. It is early. I would probably vote for Ritoky over the others, just because of how different he is playing to usual. But there's a way to go in the day yet, and I'm hoping things firm up a little. Sorry if that's wishy-washy, it's just where I am right now.

On August 20 2015 07:40 The Shining wrote:
because ur on it wave?

On August 20 2015 07:44 Fidei86 wrote:

There are, by my count, five people on my 'scum lean' list (excluding lurkers, obv). There were four mafia in Himalayas, and there were 17 players in that game. There are 21 here, so four or five mafia sounds about right (anyone with more game balancing experience care to weigh in?). Ergo my scum list is probably there or thereabouts in terms of length. Obviously it is pretty unlikely that I just called the entire scum team accurately in my first post of reads (though the post-game cred would be pretty astonishing).

I'm not sure whether any of my scum reads are stronger than any others. It is early. I would probably vote for Ritoky over the others, just because of how different he is playing to usual. But there's a way to go in the day yet, and I'm hoping things firm up a little. Sorry if that's wishy-washy, it's just where I am right now.

On August 20 2015 07:49 WaveofShadow wrote:

Well mostly because it's zero effort.
I'm aware that's sort of hypocritical but here we are.

On August 20 2015 07:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


Good job taking two posts before I came to the conclusion that you were town, but then ignoring the ones where I actually came to some sort of conclusion and then flipped that read when you called me mafia for garbage reasons.

On August 19 2015 22:35 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually I just realized that I misread ruxxar's post.
Lol oops, I need caffeine before I can brain.

On August 19 2015 22:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Ima vote him anyway though.

On August 20 2015 02:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'll do stuff when I get off work.
Rux seems sorta okay at a glance though, probably shouldn't vote him.

On August 20 2015 02:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


I changed my mind.
100% mafia

On August 20 2015 07:52 ruXxar wrote:


You managed to be the biggest waffle in the history of ever.
Let me write you the whole story of your alignment indicative posts on me:






#1) You are scum for voting me even though you admitted you were wrong.
Easy to join the bandwagon when Breshke, HTS and Rels already led the way.

#2) You are scum for having no reads. What you said about me are words without impact. It does not qualify as a read. You make bantering comments afraid of committing one way or the other.

#3) You are scum for having no interest in solving the game. Your comments lead nowhere, and are as neutral as possible, sniffing out thread sentiment and trying to follow the flow of safe harbor.

On August 20 2015 07:52 ruXxar wrote:


You managed to be the biggest waffle in the history of ever.
Let me write you the whole story of your alignment indicative posts on me:






#1) You are scum for voting me even though you admitted you were wrong.
Easy to join the bandwagon when Breshke, HTS and Rels already led the way.

#2) You are scum for having no reads. What you said about me are words without impact. It does not qualify as a read. You make bantering comments afraid of committing one way or the other.

#3) You are scum for having no interest in solving the game. Your comments lead nowhere, and are as neutral as possible, sniffing out thread sentiment and trying to follow the flow of safe harbor.

On August 20 2015 07:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


Neither are you but we make do.

:ooooooooo