|
On August 06 2015 07:51 CopCake wrote:
Oh fuck I believed I had already posted when I went to look which page this game starts.
Sup everyone
Tell me why you are forever towns and I will tell you if I disagree or not.
... i tried to say hello q.q *goes into a corner crying*
i'm town cuz i'm town! and i'm ruxxar and i'm town. so yeah! go town!
|
On August 06 2015 07:56 rsoultin wrote:
...yeah i'm going to just let damdy play for me lol
he's reading my mind today <3
ciao folks
LURKERTINAENGAGINGLURKERBUTTON!!!
Bai bai ^^
|
On August 06 2015 07:58 CopCake wrote:
How the fuck do I quote? I blocked the plus sign but got me to somewhere else
Hi Ruxxar I have a question for you, when rayn voted you why didn't you reacted? that's my only question for you
And yes Kelsier, I am good!
So instead of focusing on me why don't tell me about yourself and your reads, maybe?
I did!
|
Mm, did any scum show up yet?
Rels where are you buddy?
Don't tell me you are scum this game plsu!
|
On August 06 2015 08:03 CopCake wrote:
I can talk for sure of the people I know, which is rayn and rsoultin.
Rayn is being town in his "oh look, why dont you do this, why do you call that thing "this" but you do "another" cop mode and not just like looking for small things to blame people, people like "in general" aka he isn't looking for faults as many people as possible.
Rsoultin, let's do this analogy, we are cute lambs, mafia are wolves and rsoultin is the cute dog running in circles.
I'm trying to understand ruxxar
I don't like how Kelsier aproach me
I'm very hard to understand when I'm town ( I don't make much sense and spam a lot yay)
|
Right now I feel like I don't have any strong scum reads, don everyone is like around the neutral zone,
Quick mafia do something scummy!
|
|
|
On August 06 2015 15:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
confirmed town:
scott31337
rsoultin
just town:
FecalFeast
Damdred
KelsierSC
idk:
everyone else
mafia:
RuXxar
Why is Scott confirmed town?
Why is Igrok not on your town list?
|
Mm, coppy not responding too well to pressure IMO, but still feel it's kinda towny.
|
Don't understand Igroks case against rs, it was really bad IMO.
Still think he's most scum so far, but this game is hard.
##vote igrok
|
On August 06 2015 10:53 iGrok wrote:
Rels and EAP get a pass until they post once, or 24 hours have passed. Until then, they have a pseudo-valid excuse of having not started playing yet.
Scott is the only true lurker at the moment. If Tina starts posting actual content, I'll shift onto him. Right now Tina looks very scummy, for the reasons I stated at the top of this page.
You think Scott is scummy?
|
Igrok just wanting to lynch lurkers instead of looking for mafia motivation is like trying to escape the responsibility of his scum reads by basing it on a towny concept.
When we mislynch people it's easy to go "I pushed xyz he was the least active, it was his own fault!"
Real easy cop out and avoids getting scum read for it.
|
On August 06 2015 16:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 16:25 ruXxar wrote:
Don't understand Igroks case against rs, it was really bad IMO.
Still think he's most scum so far, but this game is hard.
##vote igrok Quote the posts from rsoultin that go against iGrok's case please.
I'll explain later when not on phone.
|
Igroks "case" in rsoul is not a case.
It's just a summary of her posts.
And he takes the time to highlight the posts where she mentions going afk as if that has significance as to why he's voting for her.
It's the worst "case" in the history if cases
F-
|
On August 06 2015 17:59 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 16:31 ruXxar wrote:
Igrok just wanting to lynch lurkers instead of looking for mafia motivation is like trying to escape the responsibility of his scum reads by basing it on a towny concept.
When we mislynch people it's easy to go "I pushed xyz he was the least active, it was his own fault!"
Real easy cop out and avoids getting scum read for it. WTF you said you agreed with his no lurker thing: Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 07:03 ruXxar wrote:
k, so to put it out there, i don't disagree with the message that igrok put out.
i also hate lurkers, so don't lurk guys kk? Explain ?
I don't like lurkers, they make the game boring and harder than it should be.
Doesn't mean that Lurkers should be automatically lynched over scummy active people.
If they are scummy and lurking, then yes, lynch with fire.
But lynching just because they post less than your arbitrary measure of what is an active poster is dumb.
|
On August 06 2015 18:56 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 18:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
iGrok can you comment on the actual cases in the thread?
Like i get your approach but there is no reason to actually discuss the inactives. Everyone knows what you are saying about inactives and active lurkers.
Care to take on onto what me/Rels have posted in the last couple of pages? As its 6am, I don't have the mental fortitude to go through other people's cases at the moment, but I'll do that tomorrow. Right now I'm just watching Dota 2 and checking the thread occasionally. Unfortunately, some people still don't seem to understand what active lurkers are (Ruxxar, I'm looking at you). You and Rels have been talking about things but, as I said, I'm not super mentally sharp right now, so I'll go over it tomorrow. I think I said something about EAP earlier today, and also, iirc Shining hadn't even posted before I left for dinner? Could be wrong on that. The point is, tomorrow I'll go through and reassess everyone to figure out who the lurkeriest lurker is.
Please educate me on what an active lurker is.
|
Also, just saying we should lynch lurked means that you're putting the whole game down to mechanics and ignoring the rest if the game.
Its pretty dumb imo
|
On August 06 2015 20:32 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 19:16 ruXxar wrote:
Also, just saying we should lynch lurked means that you're putting the whole game down to mechanics and ignoring the rest if the game.
Its pretty dumb imo OK I actually agree with this, igrok needs to start talking about something else. He promised to do that when he wakes up though. But I really didn't like how you posted at the beginning of the game. It is super different from last game, where you did your poetry stuff but didn't jump and post a million reads. In this game you spammed and talked about a lot of things and most of them were shitty reads. What do you think of scott ? Can you give a list of townie and scummy people ?
Yeah I was very chaotic reading the first few pages, if you think I'm scum for that then I have no defense, because it's what I did.
I liked Scott first post, it felt genuine.
Mm after that Scott attacked me, but I didn't really sense scum intentions.
I've never seen Scott play scum, so have no meta for this.
I still think he's a slight town read.
My 100# town this game is damdred and rsoul.
When I'm posting fluff first day to create activity, it's easy to see who is in the same relaxed, non stressed/tense mindset.
I got that vibe from damdy and rs, don't want to lunch them this game unless they do something super scummy.
Other town reads:
Kelsier I'm ok with for now.
Scott is meh, very slight town.
I think rayn is misguided town on me, wants to find scum
Rels super town, criticizing and asking edgy questions.
Who else..
Fecal is neutral ish, defo not town lean.
Coppy response to pressure was meeh, not so good.
Shining had again big polished post, it's always slight scum lean to me when I see these kinds of polished posts, big content posts.
Igrok is slight scum lean, didn't like his opening post, but could possibly come from town.
His case which is the reason for him voting rsoul is so bad and bullshit I don't even know what to say.
It made me think he's even more scum honestly.
Those are the people I remember right now, off the top of my head.
Maybe I forgot someone, dno.
I'll read more in depth when I can use a computer and read filters etc.
|
On August 06 2015 22:50 iGrok wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 22:43 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 22:41 iGrok wrote:
@Rels, Yes, I'm totally trying to separate the town and get people to fight by saying there are two different mindsets at work and we need to improve communication /SARCASM OK. Explain what is the communication problem between rayn & the rest of town 'cause I don't see it. Sure, one group understands what active lurking is and the other doesn't. One group realizes that LAL is a great policy to start D1, and the other thinks it isn't. The circles aren't Town/Mafia or anything like that - I'll welcome anyone in. I'm including Yamato because I've played with him for a long time and I know he'll get it. If he doesn't, ezpz scumread, but he's better than that.
Problem I have with your strategy is that lurking is a nebulous term for people of low post activity.
Maybe you define lurker differently from me, but lynching people with post count as the only metric without looking at the content if their posts is stupid.
|
The thing is no one is going to say "I love lurkers, let's lynch active people!"
As scum this is the perfect strategy for pushing lynches without much resistance.
And of course with your own arbitrary interpretation of what is a lurker or not(active lukers?!) you could easily pick a few townies to mislynch before you change up your strategy and lynch people for other reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
