EPTMini Mafia Down Under 3 - Page 74
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
He/she may not post unless granted additional posts by other players; if granted, he/she may not exceed aggregate limit. Exceeding the aggregate limit after a warning will result in a modkill. Votes in the voting thread do not count towards the limit. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
okay, i'm done waffling strongest towns gb ksc palmar - just finished rereading his filter and i'm not lynching him this game...like he can continue saying i'm too awful to contest a red check as town if he wants, and accuse me of tmi...i'll just laugh at him and say see i'm a god xP but ye i don't see scum in his filter when i take it in aggregate strong towns: hopeless uncc'd cop scott town by scum pushing/green check maybe town? oneg - still kinda trust the meta read/claim but it's time for the step-up ows - i dunnae how to say it other than i think we're reading the same game off the same script and i don't think scum obi can pull that off. plus lynching scum ya know  snickers - playing some weird combination of ballsy retarded scumgame if he's scum...not sure that's beyond him that leaves... bf so...ye i'll take a real close look through the bottom four, hopefully before EoN, but i'm coming out around the same place as gb and ksc...which honestly isn't that surprising lol >< my main concern tonight was palmar and to just make up my mind on him if i could. fortunately his posting this game made that easier than expected | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
I rolled VT, that's all. Also if I'd be scum, I'd concede by now. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 30 2015 17:32 Snickers wrote: You guys so realize you were like "let's lynch the person who is getting modkilled" Yeh you already said town is trash we get it. Can't believe we lynched that confirmed blue role (lol) | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
blind squirrels finding nuts | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On July 30 2015 17:32 Snickers wrote: You guys so realize you were like "let's lynch the person who is getting modkilled" He wasn't getting modkilled... | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On July 30 2015 20:07 Snickers wrote: Clarity was going to get modkilled in done by the way ignore ke No, slam replaced him... You've several dumb as fuck statements on the flow of the game. I think you need to look at the rules. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 30 2015 03:07 Snickers wrote: lol slam comes into the game and im outting him as a role. ^ heh, maybe we just kill snickers after all. his "you guys suck for killing scum" is pretty bad, and it's clear he knew that not only had slam replaced, but that he'd replaced in for clarity before the lynch. so this "you just killed someone who would be modkilled" or whatever is pretty disingenuous (\o/ hf word!). also complete wrong reaction. whether he was wrong or not, he should at least be happy that scum is backed into a corner lol >< sidenote: bf's response made me think he could be town again :/, just as his responses near EoD had me asking if we could still kill slam lol >< last scum saying ye, cool, lynch me then catch scum, i'll answer questions first? could be a wifom play. kinda doubtful why snickers is likely the last scum... association, association, association - he mentions tofu a grand total of 8 times in that ridic long filter of his during the d1 lynch, most of those times in this post defending him, which is the first time he ever mentions a read on him at all. it's also reasoning that tofu later takes up to try to say he's town: On July 26 2015 21:33 Snickers wrote: like its prty obv tofu nor scott is mafia lol. one person said i dont like this one setence about tofu and now there is a tofu train about to depart. and scott is extremely towny. He seems like a new player and a new player isnt going to put out a list of reads and have it be all leans while they are mafia. so instead of going with the flow of mafia pushing into tofu and scott lynch boxer or at least comment about my case on boxer that somehow people are ignoring. - additionally, the wording here in his second post to tofu is pretty interesting. i don't know how to explain it, but it's almost like he's trying to throw bones to the guy in thread rather than get a read on him, and it's pretty different than his aggressive behavior toward pretty much all of the other players in thread @.@: On July 26 2015 03:21 Snickers wrote: firm tofu whats ur read on boxer? I think you could make a detailed read on him. - ends up voting bf instead of clar and afking. caveat: prob should have jumped on the scott train or ft's train, but he'd been defending scott pretty hard and leaving his vote on the other two scum, if he really couldn't be around for EoD, might have felt uncomfortable. dunnae. he left well before the lynch though. note to self: check where the votes were sitting when he left - clarity also never gets the "snickers" treatment d1...first semblance of a read that isn't really a read and he goes to bf not long after: On July 27 2015 05:08 Snickers wrote: im lynching clarity, almost out of posts and have to go to work. remember vigi shoot boxer. fyi i think the scott lynch would be beyond terrible. - "mentioned" 32 times in giant-ass filter, if you define "mention" loosely lol, because most of these mentions are in reference to reads on other people or others' reads on him...clar is dropped like a hot potato (though never really a strong scumread to begin with as far as i can tell) very early into d2 here: On July 28 2015 21:58 Snickers wrote: anyway im tired this is where i am at not looking at voting patterns in order of people to not lynch today first is clairty second is boxer third is scott (note: i really dont know how scott ended with so many votes i guess i should look into fi people consolidated on scott in order to not vote tofu and had good reasons) obi and onegu are prty town i will finish later. ^ little fun fact...these are all the people ft voted, so snickers' "voting analysis" consisted of lead scum wagon voting on other lead wagons to save himself. super shit tier reasoning alert. he doesn't even bother to evaluate who ft was actually pushing (scott) of the three, and puts him last - first suggestion clar could be blue comes well after that, and given that post it's clear it wasn't a "role read" that had him saying don't lynch clar, anyway: On July 29 2015 06:22 Snickers wrote: well considering you dont know why clarity is the worst lynch - this is just a super trash set of reasons for thinking clar is blue. some of the quoted posts don't even match what he's saying. from the perspective post-lynch, it looks like he possibly is just making all this shit up: + Show Spoiler + On July 30 2015 03:05 Snickers wrote: this whole post is important. very awkward buddying to me early in the game because he was already reading me town. vt or scum dont do this. he also commented about the onegu claim cause its important to him. heres another thing roles would say again more theres the snickers lol also his whole play day one was role play overall play - overly aggressive, shit poor reasoning, with a hyper-focus on minutiae and tinfoil hat sort of arguments <-don't think i need to provide examples for this, but the gb/rsoul scumteam where rsoul is gf theory is a prime example (that this behavior didn't extend to both clarity and firm tofu is especially damning) meta note - this is pretty different from his trolly play in mafia down under 2...i was thinking possibly he was just dicking around that game and this looks more like his reg town play (as i said before, i usually associate this level of aggression with town) but honestly even when he was trolling what he was pointing out was actually intelligent and it's why i had a townread on him through most of the game until my bad townread on scum!rit ended up putting snickers further and further down the poe TLDR - super aggressive, nonsensical playstyle all game that seems to skirt around clarity and ft - strong associations with both clarity and ft - different from the town game we played together (not as trolly, not as intelligent) - "blue" read on clar seems made up - reaction to clar lynch not like town who just needs to find one more scum...bf should be practically confirmed scum to him now; instead he's just angry - snickers is mafia! -drops mic- also went back through hopeless...he kept the scott check close to the vest but him coming in to vote clar/slam instead of just staying afk and letting the bf/gb lynch happen clears him in my eyes independent of the cop claim | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
rsoul is godfather this is a wrap boyz | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 30 2015 23:36 Snickers wrote: thats not a case rsoul is godfather this is a wrap boyz Looks like a good case to me. Rsol is confirmed town so I have no idea what you're on. Lynch Snickers first. Sounds good | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On July 30 2015 23:36 Snickers wrote: thats not a case rsoul is godfather this is a wrap boyz Looks like a case to me. | ||
| ||
