Lost But Not Forgotten Mini Mafia - Page 12

On July 19 2015 02:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Fucking quotes:

EBWOP:
Kelsier:

How do you go from this....


...to this:


???

On July 19 2015 02:25 KelsierSC wrote:
...because I read VA's post

On July 19 2015 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You said yes now that i reread. I don't usually read irrelevant comments like that, because they are irrelevant. It just goes unnoticed for me.

I have a town read on FF because of the conversation he had with you as he is questioning you over something i found really dumb from you (the Onegu thing). Apparently you somehow interpret that one totally differently.

On July 19 2015 02:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:

ehhh.... Did you read my post?

On July 19 2015 02:26 Damdred wrote:
So I still don't get how he gets town points for me initiating him asking about it

On July 19 2015 02:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vayne can you go read the argument i had with Damdred and tell me what you think about it and his read on FF?
Kelsier for some reason doesn't give a fuck.

On July 19 2015 02:31 KelsierSC wrote:


I think the problem is you are treating it like Damdred has given a big case on FF and is calling him scum trying to get him lynched. Whereas Damdred has a scum lean and gave his reasons for it. So asking him to "find proof in the thread" etc. is unreasonable

On July 19 2015 02:31 Damdred wrote:
That's not what happened at all

I put that out there

FF asks me something in the post

I go well I'm more interested in why neither of you ask me about oneg now (towards kel and ff)

ff goes -sigh- why is oneg interesting

then I go byeee

On July 18 2015 09:33 Damdred wrote:
Phone likes to,screw with me,while I'm,typing making me look like Kirk.

I'm surprised and intrigued that neither of you asked why oneg is interesting

On July 19 2015 02:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:

rofl.
just look at what you are posting?!?!

On July 19 2015 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You actually never said any of those things.
The conversation you had with FF about Onegu - well FF comes out of it MUCH better looking than you do, because what he said is right. You somehow managed to turn it into "I had to pry ff to interact" when YOU were the one that bailed out of the conversation for whatever reason.

Your point (1) is really dumb. It just is. Because it is not alignment indicative in any way, and you should know it.

Your point (2) is fluff. That's how you interpret his posting. It doesn't make it true, because you can always say "X sounds [insert any word here]". You can interpret people's "tone" however you want and noone can say anything about it because you COULD actually think that.

Furthermore you show no actual proof from the thread that makes FF mafia. Literally none. Like can i say here "you sound awfully angry Damdred, that probably makes you mafia"?? Because you do, however i do not think it's alignment indicative, but as per your definition that should make you mafia, no?

On July 19 2015 02:33 Damdred wrote:


like you are missing this when ff asks me what's up with the commas but totally misses the other tgings

On July 19 2015 02:34 KelsierSC wrote:


you posted this



which is you asking to damdred to "support a case" when in fact Damdred is given a scum lean.
your response is disproportionate.

On July 19 2015 02:37 Damdred wrote:
What was important again in the thread? Ff thinks its important enough to ask why I had so many commas but not why oneg is interesting to me?

On July 19 2015 02:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:

If you think someone might be mafia you have something to support your read.
These reads comes from what people post in the thread, NOWHERE else.

Like what the fucking fuck, i am soon getting angry here. Because you are being really obtuse and saying something that makes zero fucking sense.