|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 08:38 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 08:36 Holyflare wrote: you give something and we give something Again it doesn't exactly answer Tfrel's question unless I missing something.
that's the point trfel hasn't given a proper read and instead is afking for reads so he won't get an answer until he contributes
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 03:55 Trfel wrote: I think it makes sense now....
I don't scumread LightningStrike any more.
On July 07 2015 08:31 Trfel wrote: I think that I want to lynch LightningStrike.
Anyone disagree? If so, please state why.
nothing about LS has even changed inbetween
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 08:49 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 08:46 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 03:55 Trfel wrote: I think it makes sense now....
I don't scumread LightningStrike any more. On July 07 2015 08:31 Trfel wrote: I think that I want to lynch LightningStrike.
Anyone disagree? If so, please state why. nothing about LS has even changed inbetween ^ not reading
like how on earth is that not reading?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 08:55 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 08:51 Half the Sky wrote: Going to check the timestamps to see where it came from for myself, although Trfel really needs to explain himself at this point, what changed his read? Sorry, it's not something I'm going to explain. And there is much more to my LightningStrike scumread than his latest few posts.
yeh he fucking clearly explained it
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i haven't said a word about oats geript
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 08:43 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:37 Damdred wrote:On July 07 2015 08:36 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:32 Damdred wrote:I don't disagree with lynching LS. However On July 07 2015 08:31 Half the Sky wrote:On July 07 2015 08:27 Trfel wrote: LightningStrike, hypothetically, what if someone counterclaimed ritoky? What would you think then? Do you have an opinion on ritoky independent of any claims? I don't have a read on him. Hes probably been the most talked about person for the last.... 5-10 pages maybe? claim and all, you have no opinions but quizzed ls about his? I wasn't asking to find out about ritoky, I don't really care about ritoky. I was asking to learn more about LightningStrike. hts saw the questioning why are you so blind, hf?
QUESTIONING
QUESTIONING
what in his answers lead to him reversing his earlier stance
why is he asking lightningstrike questions when he had the stance of not wanting to lynch him
none of those are answers
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
like if you're going to blindly defend him again then just don't even bother with your sarcastic "you should just read" crap when it doesn't answer my questions at all, either answer on behalf of him or don't interject at all?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
well you already think i'm mafia so that's just par for the course, shame there will be no later for you
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 03:55 Trfel wrote: I think it makes sense now....
I don't scumread LightningStrike any more.
On July 07 2015 08:19 Trfel wrote: Also, LightningStrike, what do think about ritoky now that he has claimed?
On July 07 2015 08:27 Trfel wrote: LightningStrike, hypothetically, what if someone counterclaimed ritoky? What would you think then?
On July 07 2015 08:31 Trfel wrote: I think that I want to lynch LightningStrike.
Anyone disagree? If so, please state why.
like if anyone can read this pile of shit and say:
On July 07 2015 08:59 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 08:57 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 08:49 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 08:46 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 03:55 Trfel wrote: I think it makes sense now....
I don't scumread LightningStrike any more. On July 07 2015 08:31 Trfel wrote: I think that I want to lynch LightningStrike.
Anyone disagree? If so, please state why. nothing about LS has even changed inbetween ^ not reading like how on earth is that not reading? -_- he already fucking explained it
then they are most likely mafia
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
no fucking shit my problem is that his read has changed on ls for the most classic ls answers ever
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
for someone that blindly defends or explains palmars play, someone who plays very differently a lot his stance on lightningstrike is totally different from responses that lightningstrike always gives
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:10 Half the Sky wrote: Going through WoS and LS filters again...
Those of you that know WoS, are there any general town or scum tells I should be on the lookout for? I have never played with him and reading his filter, nothing is jumping out at me as particularly scummy except for his more or less afk vote on Holyflare.
I'm not sure where that vote came from tbh, can't tell if it was tone or whatnot.
If you took that out, I'd probably given him a null to slight townlean for some of the posts in his filter, but if he's been around awhile, he probably could replicate that as scum.
his involvement with the thread and his remembering what is happening is how i read him
if he doesn't play then who knows, geript seems to think he's town though
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:12 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 09:09 Holyflare wrote: for someone that blindly defends or explains palmars play, someone who plays very differently a lot his stance on lightningstrike is totally different from responses that lightningstrike always gives not sure how the two clauses in this sentence are even related? you said nothing changed something changed you weren't reading end of story if you MEAN something else, SAY something else, instead of just shifting your scumread however it suits you
no
I said what I mean. NOTHING about LS has changed in between his not scum reading him and wanting to lynch him. The only thing that's happened is Lightningstrike answering a question in a Lightningstrike way. Nothing has changed. Trfel's read has changed. He refused to explain it. You say he explained it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Now you're just going to say "lightningstrike's answers clearly changed his read" which you know, is totally unexplained and scummy since nothing LS has said is scummy which leads us full circle back to:
On July 07 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 08:43 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:37 Damdred wrote:On July 07 2015 08:36 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:32 Damdred wrote:I don't disagree with lynching LS. However On July 07 2015 08:31 Half the Sky wrote:On July 07 2015 08:27 Trfel wrote: LightningStrike, hypothetically, what if someone counterclaimed ritoky? What would you think then? Do you have an opinion on ritoky independent of any claims? I don't have a read on him. Hes probably been the most talked about person for the last.... 5-10 pages maybe? claim and all, you have no opinions but quizzed ls about his? I wasn't asking to find out about ritoky, I don't really care about ritoky. I was asking to learn more about LightningStrike. hts saw the questioning why are you so blind, hf? QUESTIONING QUESTIONING what in his answers lead to him reversing his earlier stance
why is he asking lightningstrike questions when he had the stance of not wanting to lynch himnone of those are answers
when someone says they don't want to lynch someone and then afk's for a long time and asks them a random question about a claimed blue that warrants a generic response and then he changes their read it's pretty weird and needs explaining because:
a) why would he ask ls specifically that question when ls was off the table at that point for him, why not anyone else? b) the generic response is so classic ls that it shouldn't change the original response
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:17 Holyflare wrote:Now you're just going to say "lightningstrike's answers clearly changed his read" which you know, is totally unexplained and scummy since nothing LS has said is scummy which leads us full circle back to: Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 08:43 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:37 Damdred wrote:On July 07 2015 08:36 Trfel wrote:On July 07 2015 08:32 Damdred wrote:I don't disagree with lynching LS. However On July 07 2015 08:31 Half the Sky wrote:On July 07 2015 08:27 Trfel wrote: LightningStrike, hypothetically, what if someone counterclaimed ritoky? What would you think then? Do you have an opinion on ritoky independent of any claims? I don't have a read on him. Hes probably been the most talked about person for the last.... 5-10 pages maybe? claim and all, you have no opinions but quizzed ls about his? I wasn't asking to find out about ritoky, I don't really care about ritoky. I was asking to learn more about LightningStrike. hts saw the questioning why are you so blind, hf? QUESTIONING QUESTIONING what in his answers lead to him reversing his earlier stance
why is he asking lightningstrike questions when he had the stance of not wanting to lynch himnone of those are answers when someone says they don't want to lynch someone and then afk's for a long time and asks them a random question about a claimed blue that warrants a generic response and then he changes their read it's pretty weird and needs explaining because: a) why would he ask ls specifically that question when ls was off the table at that point for him, why not anyone else? b) the generic response is so classic ls that it shouldn't change the original response
and if his response is "ls didn't talk about ritoky claiming blue" then he didn't even need to ask the question in the first place and ls' answers should solidify that ls didn't need to respond because he though it was obvious
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:18 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 09:13 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 09:12 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 09:09 Holyflare wrote: for someone that blindly defends or explains palmars play, someone who plays very differently a lot his stance on lightningstrike is totally different from responses that lightningstrike always gives not sure how the two clauses in this sentence are even related? you said nothing changed something changed you weren't reading end of story if you MEAN something else, SAY something else, instead of just shifting your scumread however it suits you no I said what I mean. NOTHING about LS has changed in between his not scum reading him and wanting to lynch him. The only thing that's happened is Lightningstrike answering a question in a Lightningstrike way. Nothing has changed. Trfel's read has changed. He refused to explain it. You say he explained it. you do get that i am trying very hard not to shitfight with you, right? so now you're interpreting that ls' answers SHOULD have not resulted in a read change. fine. interpret it that way i don't even disagree with you, but i don't know what truffle thinks he has, and rather than throwing shit at him i'm just gonna wait cause he said he was WORKING ON IT which means if he doesn't deliver then you can get your panties in a bunch i am going to ignore you now
great you admit you're just entering into the discussion for no reason because you have no idea so stop
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
this game should be called pre-school mafia because the minute you try and question anything 10 other people jump in the way to remove it
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I've played like 2 games with trfel and both times i've been mafia. He never played this poorly ever. I even complimented him when I was mafia in a newbie game because he thought he played badly and he was playing well. This is below trash tier and I have much more respect for him than this.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
ok maybe 4 and 2 of them were town games, but he was never awful in them either
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 09:27 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 09:20 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 09:18 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 09:13 Holyflare wrote:On July 07 2015 09:12 rsoultin wrote:On July 07 2015 09:09 Holyflare wrote: for someone that blindly defends or explains palmars play, someone who plays very differently a lot his stance on lightningstrike is totally different from responses that lightningstrike always gives not sure how the two clauses in this sentence are even related? you said nothing changed something changed you weren't reading end of story if you MEAN something else, SAY something else, instead of just shifting your scumread however it suits you no I said what I mean. NOTHING about LS has changed in between his not scum reading him and wanting to lynch him. The only thing that's happened is Lightningstrike answering a question in a Lightningstrike way. Nothing has changed. Trfel's read has changed. He refused to explain it. You say he explained it. you do get that i am trying very hard not to shitfight with you, right? so now you're interpreting that ls' answers SHOULD have not resulted in a read change. fine. interpret it that way i don't even disagree with you, but i don't know what truffle thinks he has, and rather than throwing shit at him i'm just gonna wait cause he said he was WORKING ON IT which means if he doesn't deliver then you can get your panties in a bunch i am going to ignore you now great you admit you're just entering into the discussion for no reason because you have no idea so stop ...god i hope you're scum again ><
go away seriously, if you have nothing to add and even acknowledge you have no idea what he's thinking then just seriously don't even post it achieves nothing but aggravation and you know what it leads to
so stop
|
|
|
|