EPTunless you just generally think people are too retarded to figure that out for themselves when the time comes
TL Mafia LXXI: Gaiden - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
unless you just generally think people are too retarded to figure that out for themselves when the time comes | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 22:57 marvellosity wrote: did i actually miss anything in all the pages i haven't read? depends on which pages you haven't read? xP though probably not sleepy thread | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 22:57 Clarity_nl wrote: They're intertwined. We know that damdred roleblocked ritoky. We know that milo claimed roleblocked. Both happened night 1. This means that if there is a second roleblocker, milo is 100% town. you're missing that he still could have fake-claimed and then fake-claimed a roleblock lol >< even if there were another rb, cause not everyone is notified? i don't find it the moooost likely scenario with 2 mafia rb's just because of how he hard-aligned with damdred, though, which is why i thought it strange hts would think there could be 2 but didn't take it into account with her milo read | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:02 Clarity_nl wrote: Nah cause why would scum!milo fakeclaim being roleblocked when he knows that they roleblocked ritoky and X. If X is a powerrole he gets counterclaimed and lynched. he claimed cop xP rit had already claimed roleblock. and he started out with a fake red check so -shrugs- | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
like i said though, hard-aligning with damdred doesn't make that terribly likely anyway | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:04 marvellosity wrote: Generally a scumplay which relies on trying to convince the thread there are 2 mafia roleblockers, which is practically unprecedented, is very strange. yeah lol >< i doubt that was the initial intention if milo's scum...like geript's track on damdy obviously wasn't planned for | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:10 ruXxar wrote: Like, it's not hard to get my name right. Either you type ruxxar or you can type ruxx. You know that a persons name is their most precious belonging? q.q /endrant lol >< marv just can't help himself xP though i guess you haven't played with him before, have you? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
<3 clarity | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
asshole ^^ | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:14 Half the Sky wrote: From a mechanics standpoint I'm just trying to consider that with 4 conf blues flying around (DT rit, tracker, banisher, and gunsmith) how aren't there two RBs? What scum setup with 1 RB would counter all that? honestly it's why it was obvious there were fake claims flying around? i see what you mean, and this is a good reason why milo shouldn't be the auto lynch, cause it's not entirely outside the realm of possibility for there to be two mafia rbs | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:22 ruXxar wrote: What makes the 2 RB world more likely, is that the fact that even though some roles are only 1 or 2 shot, the fact that you have so many of them and they can all be used independently, really stacks the game in towns favor. lol only really if there are actually 2 cops and a tracker xP tbh...and even then tracker is somewhat nerfed cop anyway, it's a huge game, and having only 1-2 shots for at least all the claimed roles means they use it when the game is still large enough that the likelihood of catching scum on a check is still pretty small | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
you're wrong xP like technically you're right but you're still wrong since most everything in this game is refunded | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
the simple truth is if milo is actually town and not fake-claiming cop, that will resolve the rb issue one way or another | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
\o/ i'm out for a bit  btw ruxx, you no longer care about asking me the same question over and over, or did you finally actually read what i've been saying all along? xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
it's like i've seen this reasoning before | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
lol fun as pencil lobotomies are, care to spice it up any viva? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:40 ruXxar wrote: I've just come to terms with that I won't get a clear answer out of you regarding trfel. Sorry, no offense. not offended what don't you understand, though? i thought i explained it pretty damn clearly, frankly | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On July 11 2015 23:48 ruXxar wrote: I expressed my thoughts in this post I don't understand the motivation for disrupting people trying to question Trfel. I understand that HF probably was a bit mean, but you should let the mod handle that. You're not Trfel's mommy. He can take care of himself. demonstrate where i disrupted people trying to question trfel, because i didn't xP | ||
| ||
