EPTNewbie Student Mafia XI - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 15 2015 11:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Lol also this moosy vs ruxxar business. I gotta say moosy you're scaring me a little because if I'm going to get burned by one of you it looks like you'd be the one. I can visibly see you improving in the middle of this game and part of me wonders if it's because you were sandbagging all along. On June 15 2015 11:08 MoosyDoosy wrote: ^.^ Nah. idk if you'll necessarily trust me since this is a game of Mafia, but I'm not scum. Either way, thanks for the compliment. The only reason why I've been improving this much is because I have a whole host of role models and examples in this thread to look at. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 08:32 ruXxar wrote: I have to say I don't mind the Ks train. I think ks and moosy are highly likely to be together. I'd just like to point out another associative case. Man, am I getting tired of you hounding me ruXxar. All of your points have been useless so far and you've been hopping on and off wagons like it's your job. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 08:57 Trfel wrote: Despite how Kickstart has been playing lately, the ease at which his wagon is gathering steam is somewhat concerning to me... Yeah, what exactly are you people lynching Kickstart for? A few directions or quotes would be nice. Also, may I also point out ruXxar's complete willingness to hop on this wagon as well as his associative case again? | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
I'd rather not walk onto the Mafia train. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:03 ruXxar wrote: It's funny to see all these people jumping out of the woodwork to defend kickstart. *grabs popcorn* This is a terrible post. We're asking for points against Kickstart because all I see is people deciding to kill him out of nowhere. If you find it so strange, then you might want to look at your behavior with Sulfurus. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:07 ruXxar wrote: Seems like we hit the right nerve. #Productive. ^ This is an even worse post. You're trying to make it seem like your post was bait when it wasn't even intended that way. Keep them terrible posts coming ruXxar, and while you're on that, make more associative cases and jump on more wagons. Don't forget that you had the same behavior with Sulfurus, so we might have to look into that bb.  | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:13 Damdred wrote: You aren't even responding to,actual problems that are being shown Then please point out these actual problems so that I can be productive than wasting time on ruXxar. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:19 Damdred wrote: If someone keeps promising activity when ever attention is given to them. Dissapears when thread looks everywhere and,never fulfills promise it a scummy Then can Kickstart respond to this rather than continuing to promise more activity and/or provide a solid argument? | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I feel it's similar to behavior from Sulfurus and Kickstart. All three promise to post more and provide more content on some level but always give little content, end up on wagons, and disappear for some lengths of time unless directly referred to. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 16:50 Trfel wrote: Kickstart from Start of Day 2 1. Excuses instead of scumhunting + Show Spoiler + I've said this before. I can't emphasize how important this is. He's been lurking and posting "I'm not scum, I'm a mislynch" instead of explaining why he isn't scum or doing actual scumhunting. This isn't a townie mindset at all. 2. Inconsistency with regards to cop check on himself + Show Spoiler + On June 15 2015 09:18 Kickstart wrote: Cop check on me is only useful in confirming im town. I am not mafia nor is anyone really suspicious of me of being mafia from what I can tell, aside from being somewhat concerned over my afkness, cop should check someone that they think will turn up red. You are awfully concerned with what blue roles we have and what they do and you are quite wrong in what actions they should be taking. Let the blue roles play their roles and stop trying to direct them into bad plays or outing themselves. On June 16 2015 08:07 Kickstart wrote: Hm, what caused the change? He says that a cop check on himself is bad because he is town, but then says that he shouldn't be lynched until he gets cop checked.Ill be a misslynch guys, if you are that concerned wait for a cop check or something. Should just lynch sulfurus like you were supposed to day 1. ##Unvote ##Vote Sulfuras I don't think I should need to say why this is incorrect, but here goes anyway: 1. If he is in fact town, the cop check comes back green, and it's generally not good for the cop to claim a green check 2. There might not even be a cop 3. Imagine if everyone was given the right to wait for a cop check instead of getting lynched This isn't townie at all, he's making reasons to not lynch him that he knows are bad and that he already directly contradicted. 3. Read progression + Show Spoiler + On June 15 2015 07:17 Kickstart wrote: This is Kickstart's first post back. And he didn't give a single reason for these reads.Originally was suspicious mainly of ruxx and sulf. Sulf still scummy ruxx not so much. Hate to just come in and agree with thread sentiment but rels is scummy as well. Tbh I just skimmed through most of the EoD and the night stuff though. On June 15 2015 07:18 Kickstart wrote: Adds a vote on Rels.meant to go ahead and vote. ##Vote Rels On June 16 2015 08:07 Kickstart wrote: And then he switched his vote to Sulfurus, with no reason at all? What happened to Rels?Ill be a misslynch guys, if you are that concerned wait for a cop check or something. Should just lynch sulfurus like you were supposed to day 1. ##Unvote ##Vote Sulfuras His wagon lost momentum. But Kickstart doesn't say why he doesn't want to lynch Rels any more, he doesn't say why Sulfurus is scummy until much later. He's not interested in actually pushing Sulfurus, but complaining about getting lynched for false reasons and inactivity. I don't see him being interested in catching scum. His read on ruXxar doesn't make any sense. It's in these two posts. On June 16 2015 11:08 Kickstart wrote: The people who are extremely interested in starting this wagon on me are damdred and ruxxar it seems. Damdred I don't know how to read because he did this same retarded shit last game and was town so I don't know. Ruxxar has been scummy all game. Going through Ruxxars filter he is literally all over the place. From weird asoociated cases that make no sense, to saying sulfuras is scum to then saying if sulfuras flips red town can go ahead and lynch him next (first he is sure sulf is scum then few posts later he is sure he is town). It doesn't make any sense. Parts of his filter seem reasonable but then others he is just way out there. Checked to see if there were any shenanis from him around the grept lynch but his vote is just as weird as anyone elses. He did a complete 180 on his bats read though but not sure that indicates much. On June 16 2015 11:11 Kickstart wrote: "So, ruXxar is scummy for all of these reasons. Oh wait, but this could also be a new town player. Sulfurus is scum though because I don't feel he's a new town player trying to figure things out."ebwop: should clarify that while ruxxar being all over the place is concerning, I think it could also be typical of a new town player trying to figure things out. So while some of his actions are suspect, I think sulfurus has been more scummy in that I dont get that same feeling from his posting. ..... That said, his read on Oatsmaster isn't inherently bad, though I disagree with it. ##vote Kickstart That second point is looking very indicative that Kickstart is Mafia. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
Overall, I don't know what to make of that post. It's so weird and I don't follow his thought process at all. Also doesn't help that he stops posting after contributing once | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 17 2015 04:36 batsnacks wrote: People jumped on the kickstart wagon for bad reasons in general. Trfel's case was the most reasonable thing said about kickstart and even people who are sheeping it are sheeping the weaker points in the case e.g. Cop check comments. I mean kickstart is scummy as hell but the wagon feels wrong. I agree with this post the most. Trfel made some good points but I don't see any other reason to immediately start wagoning on Kickstart. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
Oh. I forgot to unvote. Thanks ##unvote Rels | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
| ||
