|
On June 23 2015 09:57 Trfel wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +On June 23 2015 09:39 ruXxar wrote:
Yeah.. I didn't understand your mafia read on moosy's first post at all.
It looked like just an excited newbie like me. His post was doing a whole lot of nothing. On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 08:10 ruXxar wrote:
I'd like to hear your reasoning for voting on me, besides the fact that very few other people have spoke up yet. I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. The first two sentences are useless. He's overwhelmed, and he is looking forward to the game. This doesn't help us find mafia. Down to business. This also doesn't help us find mafia. He then asked two questions which didn't go much of anywhere, and he took guesses at the answers, like he's already trying to justify asking the questions or show that he's trying to think about the game. This really doesn't help with doing anything other than saying "Ha, I got it right!" later, which doesn't fit a mindset of actually solving the game. Then he asked about the number of mafia in the game (which is clearly stated in the OP), and gave an unflipped association argument that didn't go anywhere. While in the same post (I think) saying that the association analysis is overwhelming him. Anyway, I think that's what makes it scumy. I was going to question MoosyDoosy about this myself, later, but I wanted to push my points on ruXxar to their conclusion (whatever that would be) first. On June 23 2015 09:55 ruXxar wrote:
I think that's going to be my new mafia tell from now on.
Too perfect play => mafia. Also, LOL  Have fun with that 
I see what you're saying about mooys post, but I still don't agree with it.
I think people are just reading too much into it, just like you did into my post at the start 
|
On June 23 2015 10:12 ruXxar wrote:On June 23 2015 09:57 Trfel wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 23 2015 09:39 ruXxar wrote:
Yeah.. I didn't understand your mafia read on moosy's first post at all.
It looked like just an excited newbie like me. His post was doing a whole lot of nothing. On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 08:10 ruXxar wrote:
I'd like to hear your reasoning for voting on me, besides the fact that very few other people have spoke up yet. I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. The first two sentences are useless. He's overwhelmed, and he is looking forward to the game. This doesn't help us find mafia. Down to business. This also doesn't help us find mafia. He then asked two questions which didn't go much of anywhere, and he took guesses at the answers, like he's already trying to justify asking the questions or show that he's trying to think about the game. This really doesn't help with doing anything other than saying "Ha, I got it right!" later, which doesn't fit a mindset of actually solving the game. Then he asked about the number of mafia in the game (which is clearly stated in the OP), and gave an unflipped association argument that didn't go anywhere. While in the same post (I think) saying that the association analysis is overwhelming him. Anyway, I think that's what makes it scumy. I was going to question MoosyDoosy about this myself, later, but I wanted to push my points on ruXxar to their conclusion (whatever that would be) first. On June 23 2015 09:55 ruXxar wrote:
I think that's going to be my new mafia tell from now on.
Too perfect play => mafia. Also, LOL Have fun with that I see what you're saying about mooys post, but I still don't agree with it. I think people are just reading too much into it, just like you did into my post at the start
O wait you were mafia... nvm.
|
Like, besides the last paragraph in moosys post I still don't see anything suspect about it.
I guess it's my untrained eye and naive gullibility at work there .
|
On June 23 2015 10:29 Sulfurus wrote:Show nested quote +On June 23 2015 10:23 Onegu wrote:
So get on TS in the mafia channel in about a half hour or so if you want to talk about the game. We will most likely stream it or record it so people can listen to it later if they dont have time today How do you do that?
Go here
|
Eh, where's the mafia channel?
|
Come join us on TS moosy!
|
Good game rels, well played
I hope we play again soon ^^.
|
Wave said that the his biggest scum tell is too much information.
Being so absolutely ecru an that someone is town.
Like how he in day 4 so easily could call eels and kick town.
He's never that certain as town.
Another thing to look for is people that are too perfect.
A mafia has a filter to everything the day, so their statements on General will look a lot more polished.
Town on the other hand, doesn't really care what they look like so much, so you will find more irregularities in their posting, a more carefree nature.
|
I hate typing on my phone btw -_-.
|
Another thing that we missed was the no lynch.
We should've absolutely no lynched.
It always the best option in a Mylo situation.
You reduce the amount if town, so that a bigger percentage of the group is mafia.
This means that when you lunch next day, you have a bigger chance of lynching mafia.
|
You live and you learn.
Ii know I said I wouldn't be mad if we lost and wave/trfel was mafia....
We'll... I'm still salty! ;p.
That's good though, because it means I will never forget the lessons I learned this game .
|
I'm starting to like you oats.
You're that extra spice that makes the game fun.
Your fake claim at the end was ballsy as fuck.
I hope we can play again soon .
|
Like, when you woke up at the last day, I was like woaaah, where has this oats been the whole game? THIS is the oats I wanted to see earlier .
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
