|
On June 09 2015 19:23 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:22 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:21 marvellosity wrote: the *point* is that you made the point about Chez *because* I questioned you on Vayne, so you turned it around to people talking or backing off Chez
one caused the other No. I did not make a point. I simply wrote about a fucking filter observation not coming to any conclusion or point. I came to that conclusion when you asked your questions 2 minutes ago. stop reading stuff into my posts that is not there. You made the fucking point to deflect off me questioning you on Vayne Show nested quote +I don't see any reason to unvote someone who is not replying to pressure. Like, you all went on the Chez train because "oh he's not here" and now that he's here you start saying "nah he doesn't look so scummy anyways". I might do the same depending on his replies but as long as there are no replies, well why should I change my stance? "why would I unvote Vayne? Here! Look at what you guys are doing with Chez!" that was precisely your defence here. What the fuck. So I explained thoroughly why I am voting Vayne. Of course I am showing what you guys are doing on Chez since I feel like noone even cares to look at my points on Vayne. Did you even check my points on Vayne by now? No? Cool shit.
|
On June 09 2015 19:24 justanothertownie wrote: Can't decide if most obvious mafia ever or not.
On June 09 2015 19:25 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:23 boxerfred wrote: not gonna continue that circlejerk now. you can't keep running away and martyring every time the heat is on. Firstly, that makes you a pussy. Secondly, that makes you a pussy.
Can't decide if strong scum tag team or simply circlejerking nerds.
|
On June 09 2015 19:28 marvellosity wrote: nerds, coming from you?
cute yeah I'm not really angry so I choose my insults on a ironical basis.
|
On June 09 2015 19:28 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:27 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:23 marvellosity wrote:On June 09 2015 19:22 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:21 marvellosity wrote: the *point* is that you made the point about Chez *because* I questioned you on Vayne, so you turned it around to people talking or backing off Chez
one caused the other No. I did not make a point. I simply wrote about a fucking filter observation not coming to any conclusion or point. I came to that conclusion when you asked your questions 2 minutes ago. stop reading stuff into my posts that is not there. You made the fucking point to deflect off me questioning you on Vayne I don't see any reason to unvote someone who is not replying to pressure. Like, you all went on the Chez train because "oh he's not here" and now that he's here you start saying "nah he doesn't look so scummy anyways". I might do the same depending on his replies but as long as there are no replies, well why should I change my stance? "why would I unvote Vayne? Here! Look at what you guys are doing with Chez!" that was precisely your defence here. What the fuck. So I explained thoroughly why I am voting Vayne. Of course I am showing what you guys are doing on Chez since I feel like noone even cares to look at my points on Vayne. Did you even check my points on Vayne by now? No? Cool shit. I distinctly remember telling you that VA doing jackshit does not make him scum and that he tends to not give a fuck as town. I distinctly remember that I played one game of Mafia thus far here and can't tell if you're right.
|
On June 09 2015 19:30 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:29 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:28 justanothertownie wrote:On June 09 2015 19:27 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:23 marvellosity wrote:On June 09 2015 19:22 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:21 marvellosity wrote: the *point* is that you made the point about Chez *because* I questioned you on Vayne, so you turned it around to people talking or backing off Chez
one caused the other No. I did not make a point. I simply wrote about a fucking filter observation not coming to any conclusion or point. I came to that conclusion when you asked your questions 2 minutes ago. stop reading stuff into my posts that is not there. You made the fucking point to deflect off me questioning you on Vayne I don't see any reason to unvote someone who is not replying to pressure. Like, you all went on the Chez train because "oh he's not here" and now that he's here you start saying "nah he doesn't look so scummy anyways". I might do the same depending on his replies but as long as there are no replies, well why should I change my stance? "why would I unvote Vayne? Here! Look at what you guys are doing with Chez!" that was precisely your defence here. What the fuck. So I explained thoroughly why I am voting Vayne. Of course I am showing what you guys are doing on Chez since I feel like noone even cares to look at my points on Vayne. Did you even check my points on Vayne by now? No? Cool shit. I distinctly remember telling you that VA doing jackshit does not make him scum and that he tends to not give a fuck as town. I distinctly remember that I played one game of Mafia thus far here and can't tell if you're right. Ok, then ask ANYONE else if it is true. We can't all be mafia. Why did you not do that? Sorry was busy circlejerking and overly defensive. So you're saying "Vayne is not scum despite the points raised since he's normally absent when he's town"?
|
On June 09 2015 19:31 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:29 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:28 justanothertownie wrote:On June 09 2015 19:27 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:23 marvellosity wrote:On June 09 2015 19:22 boxerfred wrote:On June 09 2015 19:21 marvellosity wrote: the *point* is that you made the point about Chez *because* I questioned you on Vayne, so you turned it around to people talking or backing off Chez
one caused the other No. I did not make a point. I simply wrote about a fucking filter observation not coming to any conclusion or point. I came to that conclusion when you asked your questions 2 minutes ago. stop reading stuff into my posts that is not there. You made the fucking point to deflect off me questioning you on Vayne I don't see any reason to unvote someone who is not replying to pressure. Like, you all went on the Chez train because "oh he's not here" and now that he's here you start saying "nah he doesn't look so scummy anyways". I might do the same depending on his replies but as long as there are no replies, well why should I change my stance? "why would I unvote Vayne? Here! Look at what you guys are doing with Chez!" that was precisely your defence here. What the fuck. So I explained thoroughly why I am voting Vayne. Of course I am showing what you guys are doing on Chez since I feel like noone even cares to look at my points on Vayne. Did you even check my points on Vayne by now? No? Cool shit. I distinctly remember telling you that VA doing jackshit does not make him scum and that he tends to not give a fuck as town. I distinctly remember that I played one game of Mafia thus far here and can't tell if you're right. + Show Spoiler [VayneAuthority] +5 minutes of your time to confirm/deny jat Wow, such small filters. ##unvote
|
On June 09 2015 19:35 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:33 prplhz wrote: jat maybe you can not be a dick and we'd all have a better time? Can you maybe play the game instead of whining about my play and we'd all have a better time? I wouldn't even have to be mean to you. yay circlejerking without me this time, I like that
|
I'll try to think more and post less.
|
On June 10 2015 00:24 fuba wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2015 00:18 justanothertownie wrote:On June 10 2015 00:15 Half the Sky wrote:
Someone (you marv?) said he had a hard time posting as scum and a quote like that with a response like that (second quote) makes me think (if what you are saying is correct) he's posting just to post.
That's the impression I get from reviewing those last two things of his filter.
He says Vayne is scummy and I'm having a tough time seeing why, you are having a tough time seeing why and then he says "I never said....etc....it's pretty much all I can say."
The quotes alone don't make him mafia but based on what you (or whoever said it) know about him, that he has trouble posting or in this case explaining his position on Vayne. Exactly. Right now, I'm still thinking BF is town. Though I'm gonna read his previous game to see if I get the same feeling from him there as I do here. And I have little idea about Vayne. The only thing I directly remember about him is his reaction to yamato flipping (which was either just an honest town reaction or scum wifom) and the fact that he reposted his post about me from our last game together (which would seem to indicate he's a survivor XD). So... my current VA read is a whole lot of *shrugs* My behaviour this game is totally different from last game I have to say. Lots of bullshit posts and lots of fights that I normally don't take.
|
On June 10 2015 00:04 Half the Sky wrote: If that was it, then that's even worse than I expected.
I checked VA's filter now - he voted once for Mig and once for Chez, post-lynch reaction he's saying wtf Yamato has sunk to new lows (paraphrasing) so that just doesn't compute logically on my end.
On June 07 2015 08:31 boxerfred wrote:Wow just went into Vayne's filter. Not even a whole page. Around EoN though, with two posts indicating that Yamato really did bad plays: Show nested quote +On June 07 2015 08:05 VayneAuthority wrote: i am really surprised yamato plays like that as scum now too, he has sunk to new lows Show nested quote +On June 07 2015 08:07 VayneAuthority wrote:On June 07 2015 08:06 justanothertownie wrote:On June 07 2015 08:05 VayneAuthority wrote: i am really surprised yamato plays like that as scum now too, he has sunk to new lows nah man, yamato always sucked as mafia. i mean just the blatant anger and insults, so unnecessary as scum lol Vayne, you seem to be bothered quite a lot with the death of yamato? Thought you wouldn't care too much: Show nested quote +On June 07 2015 06:09 VayneAuthority wrote: i dont think yamato is mafia but dont mind if he dies. hes basically just IamRobik except he doesnt ever get warned for behavior somehow even though every post he makes is a personal insult
On June 07 2015 08:33 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2015 08:47 VayneAuthority wrote: i really dont see whats so unbelievable about jailkeeper/doctor tbh. if there is another blue then it is pretty ridiculous but just the 2 on their own is not a big deal. I would probably give mafia something like roleblocker/vig and call it a day. Trying to derail townies into thinking about a unlikely setup? Show nested quote +On June 06 2015 10:00 VayneAuthority wrote: i think mig is still a good lynch tbh, all this confirmed is that the guy is town and giving a genuine opinion on mig. Weak read followed by a vote? More shady than slim, bro.
Yes.
On June 10 2015 00:00 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 08 2015 22:59 fuba wrote: I will say that the scummiest thing about vane isn't even anything he did. In yamato's last game, he opened with an instant vote for VA. Basically a policy lynch. I think he could have done the same thing this game and not looked suspicious, but he didn't. Maybe because he didn't want to bus so early? *shrugs*
(At work for the next few hours) Alright Marv (from your quote on this), I am also having this same problem with this quote he says on Vayne. Vayne doesn't post much as either alignment, and even as scum he's not as tryhard as he was supposedly before (well I learnt that the hard way in Aperture 4). I also don't understand the associative read that he makes between yam and VA here. Fuba are you referring to the timing of the vote here that makes Vayne scummy? Had to read this more than a few times now. I checked the vote count and VA voted Chez so I am completely confused by this? In any case looking at the rest of the filter, I still would have expected some followup if he had a problem with Vayne. Even a one-liner for what it was worth.
So we not dropping Vayne, ya? fredies likes that. ##vote Chezinu because everyone does it anyways. I guess I'll be next up for the lynch so let this not be a mislynch, please.
|
On June 10 2015 00:30 marvellosity wrote: I bring that out in people <3 I've halfway given up on this game already.
|
On June 10 2015 00:34 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2015 00:28 boxerfred wrote: My behaviour this game is totally different from last game I have to say. Lots of bullshit posts and lots of fights that I normally don't take. And how does bullshit and fighting make you town (by the way you worded it)? Not at all. But my read on Vayne, my filter diving on yamato (when I typed this post, I hadn't read NaCl's case yet but I guess that will nobody believe anyways) and my conclusions to it, my push on marv.
|
thing is that when I have to catch up on pages, I read them, quote a post, answer to it, continue reading. I don't know if you can see this from my posting behaviour. when nacl's case was built up, I had to catch up 10+ pages because I had been busy before.
|
On June 10 2015 07:00 NaCl`y wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2015 06:55 Chezinu wrote:On June 10 2015 06:52 marvellosity wrote: are you actually going to claim or what? I claimed day 1. I doubt most voters even read my filter. Then why did you ignore 2 doctor claims and vote someone else? Why did you check marvellosity over fecalfeast who you had called mafia the entirety of day 1? Why did you leave it so long to "out" a red check on marvellosity? Why did you leave it till an hour before deadline to properly claim?
On June 09 2015 17:02 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2015 16:59 Mig wrote:Some stuff I noticed, marv/yam interaction looks a little forced to me. Marv has to have played with yam 50 times by now. Yam is like this every game, the marv blow up seems overly emotional. I have seen marv blow up before but this seemed a bit much considering yam was just being his usual yam self. Just something to keep in mind.Feast/artanis interaction - If either of artanis/feast are scum it is very unlikely that the other is also. The claim/counter claim/ artanis vote feast stuff is too random. Just a weird/unlikely series of interactions if the scum team planned out an artanis fake claim. I honestly have no idea if having 2 protection roles would be OP for town or not. If mafia has a rber it doesn't seem that outlandish to me. That being said I am fine with lynching artanis. I read through Noir mini mafia that he just played and I actually think artanis played well that game. Day1 of that game was about as useless as this day1 has been and he still managed to actually post some useful thoughts. So far today he has posted a paragraph on being a little suspicious of JTA and that's it. Along with that his story for why he claimed is meh. Alternating between claiming because he was bored and because marv mentioned his line with the word lock in it. It was fairly clear that marv wasn't even saying that it was a bread crumb just that artanis was giving superfluous commentary. Assuming that mafia would have figured out he was JK from that is retarded. Seems more likely that artanis is bsing. On June 06 2015 07:50 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also as scum if this had happened I'd know I'd have been caught and just afk for the rest of the day. Self-meta and all but it's probably accurate. Kind of funny he said this, made a few more posts then disappeared for the rest of the day as well. Artanis if you are town give your reads, make a case etc. Good stuff maybe? dunno
if he flips green, we lynch marv amirite?
|
no wait if he flips blue that is
well gnite won't be around eod because i need to sleep.
|
On June 10 2015 07:08 marvellosity wrote: we're not lynching marv whatever happens haha you wish
##unvote ##vote marvellosity
|
|
On June 10 2015 07:09 marvellosity wrote: oh don't flatter yourself honey. b-but I'm looking so good today
|
|
Why exactly is marv town, jat?
|
|
|
|