EPTNewbie Student Mafia IX - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
wrong superbia =/= mafia. scott following up on superbia's read without going to check it is more suspect to me than superbia making the read. also your read on me is lulz. you get 1/2 of a town cookie. but o gawd list post. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
okay ff we town here bro, let's do it. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 11:52 -Celestial- wrote: Personally I think the filter miss of Superbia WAS a simple mistake, an oversight. But scott's response to it was either terrible town play or a gleeful scum play jumping on HtS not being around in an attempt to take a leading role in a lynch for some early town credit. I know the whole associative reads between Superbia and scott isn't the best way to do it; but given how mafia team members would inherently trust what each other posts I don't think its too far of a stretch. Everything on ritoky is circumstantial. But its my best third read at the moment to round the team off. i don't know how much mafia you have played, but playing the association game too hard can get you in a bad spot. you run into people like me who, as mafia, bus my teammates into oblivion with 0 remorse. independent reads are a bit stronger on these forums. just a piece of advice. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 11:49 -Celestial- wrote: His two posts are these: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=7#131 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=7#134 A broken BB code post trying to embed a town claim in spoilers and him asking "Scott are you the dude that always posts in obs qts?" doesn't really amount to anything substantial to me I'm afraid. X-D then what do you make of shining's vote pressure and desire to push SL into actively playing D1? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
we will start from here | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 12:21 Fecalfeast wrote: Is this a read robik would approve of? I think I see what you're saying lol was it robik who lynched people who had extra enters on their posts cuz they were editing them a bunch? didn't think it was robik, thought it was some1 else. read actually was relatively accurate surprisingly enough. i just don't understand your thought process here scott. superbia makes read about something not being in HtS filter -> you think superbia is town -> you don't check the reference -> you continue superbia's push. how is this coming from a town mindset? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 12:31 scott31337 wrote: You are right - I did not check it until afterwards. I did not re-read the pre-game excuses until afterwards. That was my fault. I got better backing when I roll scum anyway - I wouldn't have made such a dumb mistake. We have plenty of time - we will have convincing arguments for you  ? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
fight time boyzzzzz | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 19:55 disformation wrote: Good morning everyone. Some stuff I am wondering: Stutters695 : You were around for a bit, but my list on you is empty and your filter is really short. Give us something more to work with? How bad do you think scott looks now? Any idea of who you would lynch as of now? Scum reads? ritoky : Your two pushes so far were towards me were easy pushes on me and y0su, both of which are newbies. Coincidence or looking for easy misslynches? You also seem to be defensive about superbia. Scum mate of yours? sicklucker : For not wanting to play d1, you seem to be around a bit. Changed your mind a bit, or is it more in the vain of your d1 reads being bad anyway? Not sure what your spamy stuff is supposed to be though. Kinda confused tbh. If that was what you were aiming for: congrats. i am interested in why you don't have an opinion on scott. he seems to be a focal point of the day phase, yet you neglect giving any thoughts on him. what are your thoughts on scott? as for my "push" on you, if you think people pushing you to give definitive answers about your thoughts makes them scum, then you're going to spend the entire game lynching town. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 03 2015 19:58 Superbia wrote: Rest of your reads are pretty fluffy. while i agree with you that the majority of that opening post is meh at best, his scott read is good. you don't seem to mention it as having any value. why? if you disagree, tell me bout it m8. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 04 2015 01:46 Superbia wrote: Ritoky you want to share your scum reads so far or do you just wanna chill and see for a little? maybe scott and maybe shining atm are my top 2. not particularly firm on either. am moreso looking for towns right now. i think me, ff, -c- are pretty much town. then superbia, and prp are 2nd tier town for now. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 04 2015 01:55 Superbia wrote: The scott read was okay at best. I don't see how it is very alignment indicative. Did scott really blindly trust me? I don't know. It's not entirely clear to me what scott did that lead to the decision to vote HtS, it was pretty quiet after I thought I caught the slip. To me it felt like there was a bit of confusion from scott's part on what was actually happening. I would like to hear some more from scott on his thought process, but I don't find his vote on HtS particularly alignment indicative. it reminded me of how i lynched mafia on day 1 in hearthstone mafia. someone gave a piss poor and inaccurate read on day 1. and then another player immediately agreed with it and helped push it as an attempt to pocket the person who made the read and get in on the ground floor of a lynch. i looked into the accuracy of the read/push and it was complete garbage. in that situation, the guy who follows the garbage read is usually more likely scum than the person making it. that was the case in hearthstone. and i think i poorly explained this one, rip me. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 04 2015 02:01 y0su wrote: been busy (working on my lists when I get to sit at the computer) quite curious about how you put someone on your team (even t2) with just a few posts? he made one of the highest quality observations in the thread in regard to shining and i had literally the exact same thought reading the exact same thing: On May 03 2015 08:41 prplhz wrote: like he's trying to make up some excuse for being useless and then he tries to solve the game and that like 30 posts into the game he is also giving definitive alignment reads instead of hedging. if i remember prp's play right he hedges a lot more as mafia. | ||
| ||
