|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 21:30 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 21:23 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 21:20 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 21:11 marvellosity wrote:
Pretty much. I may have missed a couple of pages somewhere but not much Are you part of the gym? Don't think so. You would know if you were. Ok.
Certainly not then :p
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:15 Holyflare wrote:
I just feel like spite lynching people who ignored my points because they were actually great
*woofs and wags tail*
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Just the lead, I got a collar
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I wonder if this is gonna work out kinda like Chrono Trigger where there wasn't much death at the start and it accelerated later because of HP mechanics
or if deaths will come at a more normal pace
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played.
So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:29 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played. So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think? I remember Sandroba said he was reading the thread and thought he just being genuine about it myself when he saw the list post by HF I mean he coulda been afk while were all discussing things to form reads.
ugh.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:33 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:30 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:29 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played. So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think? I remember Sandroba said he was reading the thread and thought he just being genuine about it myself when he saw the list post by HF I mean he coulda been afk while were all discussing things to form reads. ugh. What?
ugh = your reasoning is terrible but I am not sure what that means for your alignment right now
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:39 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:34 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:33 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:30 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:29 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:26 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:23 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
LS, why did you have nothing to say about what HF was talking about with sandroba?
He pushed his point *a lot* so it's not like you could have missed it?
Also I mean yes I saw that post in your filter, but it was a long time before all the serious discussion happened around sand in the last several hours of the day I checked Sandroba's filter and others said Sandroba is just a bad player when the serious discussion was going around which is how I felt about him myself. I think it kinda reminds me of FF's case on me in Guardians Day 1 when that case can be used in every game I had played. So when Holyflare made the point that sandroba couldn't possibly think HF's reads were fabricated because he'd only just come back to the thread, what did you think? I remember Sandroba said he was reading the thread and thought he just being genuine about it myself when he saw the list post by HF I mean he coulda been afk while were all discussing things to form reads. ugh. What? ugh = your reasoning is terrible but I am not sure what that means for your alignment right now What's your current stance on the swamp inhabitant? Still town? I kinda think so even though this hardcore tunnel is a little disturbing.
yeah, I think so. I think my original reasoning is still pretty much correct.
she has some ok posts too.
although her filter still gives me shooting pains in my eyes
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba.
thought experiment: what were Damdred's options?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP).
btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant
1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check
2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check
Good early read tbh.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:48 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:47 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba. thought experiment: what were Damdred's options? Sandroba or Yamato were his only options but he sheeped his townreads (Shining and HF).
Yes that's the superficial answer. I wasn't literally asking for what his options were, sweetest.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:50 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:47 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba. thought experiment: what were Damdred's options? Damdred could have voted pretty much whoever he wanted. I'm sure he could have gotten away with a yamato vote.
I'm sure he couldn't, as he's barely getting away with a sandroba one :p
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:52 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:48 LightningStrike wrote:On April 28 2015 22:47 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:46 Xatalos wrote:
If we assume that yamato is town (kind of likely), then Damdred looks a decent amount better for his critical vote on sandroba. thought experiment: what were Damdred's options? Sandroba or Yamato were his only options but he sheeped his townreads (Shining and HF). The townread/sheeping on shining is the thing that's weird about it. I also remembered that weneed to keep in mind that there is 3p in this game when evaluating wagons.
P.S. I am replacing HF with you for my 3p read.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:53 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:49 marvellosity wrote:On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP). btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant 1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check 2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check Good early read tbh. Is there any point to this post or do you just feel like being tediousyourself? Any reason to think Breshke isn't scum? No? Then shut up.
Sure there are reasons.
Why use your first option to attack a scum-mate's post?
Offhand comment about visiting HF-PGO seems pretty town, and I think you even agree with this.
Swamprat.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:54 Xatalos wrote:
What 3P? It isn't even guaranteed that there's a 3P or what kind?
yes it is guaranteed
and i just like to read prominent players as 3p
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
although the vague reasoning for both HF and indignant is what they claimed their roles do (PGO + doesn't-return-town-to-checks)
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:56 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2015 22:54 marvellosity wrote:On April 28 2015 22:53 indignant wrote:On April 28 2015 22:49 marvellosity wrote:On April 26 2015 20:44 indignant wrote:On April 26 2015 11:31 Breshke wrote:On April 26 2015 07:03 sandroba wrote:
Hello guys. I'm happy to have finally rolled town. Looks to me we have ~ 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on my own HP. Seems sweet and I expect mafia/3rd party to have some powerful roles based on that. Im really intrested how you figured it is 1 and a half lynches per complete cycle based on your hp and stuff since the first cycle there is no fight promoter and the fight only causes 5 dmg to each participant. Based on the information in the OP at all and my own HP I would think that someone would have to participate in multiple fights to be killed by this mechanic add that on with no fight first day cycle just don't get how you got to 1.5 lynches per day. This being said I think I heard your very good with mechanics, where did I read this I think marv said it? So i assume you are right I just don't see how.Also hi everyone This post feels off. The bolded paragraph in particular seems like Breshke knows that sandro is town. Why do you just assume that sandro is right if you just stated multiple reasons that indicate otherwise? I also don't really understand what's so interesting about this in general since based on sandros post it should be obvious what he is talking about (his own HP). btw as for my early d1 tedious-read on indignant 1. Breshke is quizzing scum - check 2. indignant claims it's like Breshke knows sand is town - check Good early read tbh. Is there any point to this post or do you just feel like being tediousyourself? Any reason to think Breshke isn't scum? No? Then shut up. Sure there are reasons. Why use your first option to attack a scum-mate's post? Offhand comment about visiting HF-PGO seems pretty town, and I think you even agree with this. Swamprat. If you keep attacking me for an early read that you don't even know the actual correctness of then I will just ignore you from now on. Even if it wasn't a good read - so what?
what do you mean "keep attacking" you? I brought it up once since then (the post you are responding to) and it wasn't even serious (how can a "tedious" read from early d1 be serious?)
In your own words - "Chill".
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:57 Xatalos wrote:
Oh yeah, a malicious 3P would want to avoid getting blue visits...
So did you agree with my take on Damdred's options?
I would add it wasn't obvious how much his vote would or would not affect the outcome, as votes came in thick and fast. sand was leading the whole way until a quick flurry of yamato votes brought him up level
so i don't know that damdred would know his vote would *largely* increase sand's chances of getting lynched
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 28 2015 22:59 indignant wrote:
There is literally 0 reason to read me as anything but town.
you've said there's literally 0 reason to read you as mafia when you were mafia before
just sayin
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
