|
On March 29 2015 21:32 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 20:53 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 20:51 Onegu wrote:On March 29 2015 20:39 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 13:52 yamato77 wrote:Is the LS thing because of this? On March 28 2015 09:28 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin hasn't entered and I finding kinda odd even though both of us are playing Voice Mafia together. On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote:
rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. It is strange, but idk why a mafia would just choose a player to tunnel from the start of the game. I'm not sure if this is a serious post or not. This is precisely what mafia can and like to do? I don't think that what LS has done justifies the strength of the push on him, but this is a very strange way of semi-defending him. I asked you for a loan What is the monetary value of your lost item? 2.573 greymist points
The Bank has no use for Greymist points
|
|
|
Give me a fullclaim please.
|
I'm really uncomfortable with people voting VA.
|
On March 29 2015 21:55 LightningStrike wrote:
Okay I am Commissioner Gordon a weird variation to a Parity Cop T_T
What's weird about it?
|
That might be too strange to be made up.
|
On March 29 2015 22:13 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 22:11 Holyflare wrote:On March 29 2015 21:59 rsoultin wrote:
dude seriously all i asked for was something original
-facedesks-
this is almost pissing me off how you've approached this game, especially if you're town
meh
yo, hf, you comfortable with truffle's "you're a good scum player i don't know how to read you" turning into a vote on you xP while saying y'all have the same scumreads but pushing a lynch of a player he believes to be a third party? well I simply chalked it up to me trolling around and not doing much to me actually starting to play and thus his read changed not sure I like this though On March 29 2015 21:57 Sepulchre wrote:
@Holyflare's listpost: I disagree heavily with batsnacks, I'd put him next to WaveofShadow personally. I'm somewhat okay with the rest of the list to varying degrees.
The two people who said Hapahauli is a Jester-type role I read as very town. It fits perfectly the kind of wtf play he has been doing and I think no mafia would say that in this situation - Hapahauli was (and is I suppose) the prime lynch target and as mafia they wouldn't care one bit about that, so long as it's not a mafia member getting lynched.
Between rsoultin and VayneAuthority I think VayneAuthority seems like the smarter guy. So I'll vote him now since I can't fully guarantee being back before the deadline. likes my list to varying degrees (fine i get the batsnacks thing but he's town so w/e) and likes the jester ppl and then... votes va who he knows not much about at all? i don't really think he's even said much about va at all yeh he's said absolutely 0 things about VA and VA wasn't even one of the people that talked about the jester thing so this just magically appears
On March 29 2015 13:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
my personal opinion is that hapa has a role that wants to be lynched or something. Whether that is town or mafia remains to be seen lol.
|
|
|
On March 30 2015 00:18 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 00:14 Alakaslam wrote:On March 29 2015 20:53 Chezitwo wrote:
Ironically given BH's posting, BH would make a great policy lynch. I'm fairly sure he'd happily play this way as mafia, but he could easily play like this as town too. Hence a good policy lynch.
I think we're more likely to make headway looking for mafia in HtS and Damdred who are more straightforward with their play. Both of what they've done suggests scum, but it's almost too obvious, so I'd like to see a lot more between now and the end of the day. I don't really like this post i kind of agree "bh can do this as town or mafia" "damdred and hts can do this as mafia but it's too obvious!" says absolutely nothing about who we should lynch
Would you rather I fabricated certainty? Do you think any of those players have done anything one way or another to deserve a firmer read?
|
On March 30 2015 01:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
Anyway I think the power is only to overrule the D1 lynch and I think you've got this in hand. I don't really necessarily agree with your targets, but then I don't necessarily think you'll lynch the people you've stated are your primary targets in the end.
What's wrong with the targets?
|
I personally like a sicklucker lynch. He's basically claimed third party.
Is this a townie thing to say?
|
On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum
On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing.
That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things.
|
On March 30 2015 01:38 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 01:32 Chezitwo wrote:I personally like a sicklucker lynch. He's basically claimed third party. Is this a townie thing to say? i know who said it and where you pulled it from, so i'm already tainted  but yes i've already pointed this out as interesting...not sure it's alignment-indicative though, chez
The other thing that I thought was potentially interesting is that in one post he said he had no read on HF, and the next post he was voting HF as supertownie man.
HF had posted a lot in between, so maybe it was warranted after all. But there is this line:
His lynch candidates also generally line up with mine.
I'm not sure how true this is, HF hasn't seemed predisposed to lynch sl, HF finds ExO townie, and Trfel said next to nothing about Hapa.
|
On March 30 2015 01:41 LightningStrike wrote:Chez is Artanis Tina 
Bitch please.
|
On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well
You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion.
But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine.
|
On March 30 2015 02:03 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2015 21:59 rsoultin wrote:
yo, hf, you comfortable with truffle's "you're a good scum player i don't know how to read you" turning into a vote on you xP while saying y'all have the same scumreads but pushing a lynch of a player he believes to be a third party? kinda preaching to the choir on this one chez
Have 10 Gold Dragons
|
On March 30 2015 02:09 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 02:06 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. +1 sorry chez like the whole thrust of his read appeared to be you wouldn't go rogue (lolol pun intended) and do whatever the fuck you want...like saying someone is intelligent and not pursuing (what he perceives to be) mislynches is a kinda weak townread, at least from where i'm sitting
The fact you don't like the read doesn't mean it doesn't exist; namely that I don't seem rash which fits his warrior profile, and the fact I try to look at both sides of the coin rather than pushing people into the dirt (Koshi at the time).
|
On March 30 2015 02:23 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2015 02:15 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 02:09 rsoultin wrote:On March 30 2015 02:06 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:57 Chezitwo wrote:On March 30 2015 01:49 Damdred wrote:On March 30 2015 01:37 Chezitwo wrote:On March 29 2015 22:46 Damdred wrote:
Quoting on phone is bad for me rs so I'll just thought dump on him.
I don't like snarls specifically because of the way he approaches kita and hap in general. He pushes against any hapa sentiment and chainsaw defends to me in a few points, and his opening vote was interesting but he gave little to no reasoning or showed what towny things chez was doing. I think he's probable Scum On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
On March 29 2015 10:49 Snarfs wrote:On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote:On March 29 2015 10:03 Snarfs wrote:
i'm voting chez because I think as a warrior whoever he would pick to lynch would be well explained in thread. From his posting I feel like he'd pick someone intelligently and with input from town, he doesn't seem quick to pull the trigger which is exactly what I outlined in our ideal warrior.
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. That's the 2nd bad or lazy read Damdred made. You can agree or disagree with the reasoning Snarfs made making me town, but he very clearly gave it and more than once. And his filter isn't really long enough to miss these things. No that doesn't disprove what I'm saying at all. Look at what is aid and look at what he said. He isn't it showing what you are doing he's making general statements without anything to back them up in his posts. So no it's not a lazy read. Also show me what are these things he's talking about if he's explaining himself well You literally said he gave little to no reasoning, when he was very explicit with why he was voting for me. I don't understand your point about showing what I'm doing, he doesn't have to make quotes to have a valid opinion. But I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm not even sure it makes you mafia, because your comments on how he treated Hapa are fine. No we need to discuss this. Your correct in that you don't have to quote etc. To have an opinion. I disagree that he is well or explicit in your reasoning. I find his explanation to be really generic and blanket with little reasoning. +1 sorry chez like the whole thrust of his read appeared to be you wouldn't go rogue (lolol pun intended) and do whatever the fuck you want...like saying someone is intelligent and not pursuing (what he perceives to be) mislynches is a kinda weak townread, at least from where i'm sitting The fact you don't like the read doesn't mean it doesn't exist; namely that I don't seem rash which fits his warrior profile, and the fact I try to look at both sides of the coin rather than pushing people into the dirt (Koshi at the time). No one is saying it doesn't exist, its obvious it's there in its filter. Why you are hard defending the read IDK. Nor why you are trying to explain how read when he's not giving anything just blanket statements doesn't make the read not what I've said
I'm not. I was very clear.
You said:
1. There was little to no reasoning
I said
1. There was reasoning
This is also why I said I didn't want to discuss it anymore.
|
HF, you should really vote for someone not-Vayne.
|
On March 30 2015 02:46 Holyflare wrote:
do you think greymist would put a role in that limits someones ability to post and makes them not able to talk about it?
No, I don't
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
