EPT1 People don't trust you
2 Check itself could have been tampered with.
Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal - Page 182
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
1 People don't trust you 2 Check itself could have been tampered with. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
So I think kill the right scummer and you'll be set free. That's how I'm interpreting that. Unless you have cause to think otherwise. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
GLaDOS is a mechanic. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
well then for now VA | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:15 justanothertownie wrote: The black reaper. Very towny sounding name. lol'd | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
I also have reservations about lynching VA, and they are important. This feels like a horrible idea. Unfortunately majority lynch makes this game hard. Would people be opposed to lynching someone like damdred/batsnacks/BH? I have bad feelings about all 3. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:32 justanothertownie wrote: There have been roles in earlier greymist games that had to get people to vote for slams target which was not in the game. Exactly, and it was usually just denying town a lynch, which is why I would rather let people vote VA. BUT otherwise, I think lynching GLaDOS allows me to be more town KP that we can clearly use due to things like Majority lynches, which in fact is perfect for doing the GLaDOS lynch but not if we can do a solid majority. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:33 yamato77 wrote: I have a hypothesis on who killed Hapa, but it's not really important. I also have reservations about lynching VA, and they are important. This feels like a horrible idea. Unfortunately majority lynch makes this game hard. Would people be opposed to lynching someone like damdred/batsnacks/BH? I have bad feelings about all 3. You will need to explain why it is a horrible idea. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:31 Alakaslam wrote: I do have cause to think otherwise. GLaDOS is a mechanic. I'm thinking this through. So we have to vote out a mechanic.... That's incongruent with the rules though what Greymist linked...sort of... 4. You may (not) vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game. Maybe the mechanic is owned by someone. That person (presumably a scummer?) dies and you can set yourself free. Maybe? | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
WE NEED TO VOTE GLADOS IF WE CAN'T AGREE TO VOTE VA THEN THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO VOTE GLADOS jat will you help me on this -_- i have every reason to trust slam. if you trust me, help me | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:32 justanothertownie wrote: There have been roles in earlier greymist games that had to get people to vote for slams target which was not in the game. EBWOP - I was typing my last post when you posted this. So I stand corrected then, this would be a possibility. JAT, what were the consequences of voting a mechanic? Town favoured, scum favoured or neutral? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:34 Alakaslam wrote: Exactly, and it was usually just denying town a lynch, which is why I would rather let people vote VA. BUT otherwise, I think lynching GLaDOS allows me to be more town KP that we can clearly use due to things like Majority lynches, which in fact is perfect for doing the GLaDOS lynch but not if we can do a solid majority. lol or not -amused- -flicks slam- | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:35 rsoultin wrote: LISTEN TO SLAM WE NEED TO VOTE GLADOS IF WE CAN'T AGREE TO VOTE VA THEN THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO VOTE GLADOS jat will you help me on this -_- i have every reason to trust slam. if you trust me, help me pm me your reasons to trust slam because I don't see any | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:35 rsoultin wrote: LISTEN TO SLAM WE NEED TO VOTE GLADOS IF WE CAN'T AGREE TO VOTE VA THEN THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO VOTE GLADOS jat will you help me on this -_- i have every reason to trust slam. if you trust me, help me We don't know who Glados is. -.- | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:34 Half the Sky wrote: I'm thinking this through. So we have to vote out a mechanic.... That's incongruent with the rules though what Greymist linked...sort of... Maybe the mechanic is owned by someone. That person (presumably a scummer?) dies and you can set yourself free. Maybe? This seriously could be the case, I hadn't thought of this. Dude. My role may have given us the ability to lynch a scum for free. I have to lynch GLaDOS by name! SO if this is true, that scummer will die! | ||
|
justanothertownie
16322 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:36 Half the Sky wrote: EBWOP - I was typing my last post when you posted this. So I stand corrected then, this would be a possibility. JAT, what were the consequences of voting a mechanic? Town favoured, scum favoured or neutral? Don't remember. Look it up. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 01 2015 03:34 justanothertownie wrote: You will need to explain why it is a horrible idea. Because we have no real concrete evidence suggesting that he's mafia. He also pinged crossfire literally all of D1. Yes he's capable of that as mafia but I remain thoroughly unconvinced. AT THE VERY LEAST, we should be talking about other people anyway, as wasting the day by sitting on this VA lynch is a poor idea. | ||
| ||
