EPTOn March 19 2015 01:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
This sounds like a great idea, I might try that.
This sounds like a great idea, I might try that.
that's essentially what I do.
TL Mafia LXX: Guardians of the Galaxy - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
that's essentially what I do. | ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
/in I will be afk for large amounts of time though so be warned of that | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
I feel the most sympathetic toward the scum team...especially if any of the players play scum like I do and actually read the game xP mrrrrrt Horn was a bitch and I was super busy that week...and lol that was a mini geript thinks he plays better when he doesn't post as much and just analyzes xP he's probably right there's this rule...in science...damn I need to google the word isn't coming...not the Hawthorne Effect but kinda the same principle...by the very act of interacting with others you change their behavior? in my case i'm too blunt/direct often which is something i'm trying to change...not be quite so obvious where my head's at if it causes players to play differently than they would otherwise  | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
it does look like a similar concept, though nah, it's specifically related to scientists observing people or animal behavior, and that behavior changing because of the knowledge that the scientists are there...:/ I just can't remember the name of it I think it was in reference to gorillas originally? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
Rasputin, are you talking about classical conditioning or the Pavlov experiment? Or am I mixing that up with something else? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
this is an unintentional by-product of the fact that you're studying something and they're aware of your presence...implies a subject of more intelligence than molecules truffle is talking about how you can't be perfectly precise (the better your measurement in one dimension, the less accurate in another, essentially) >< I've completely derailed this thread now lol | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
The Hawthorne effect (also referred to as the observer effect) is a type of reactivity in which individuals improve an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
like that assumes people act better which wasn't really what I was after lol >< | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
And they teach the uncertainty principle in basic physics classes. | ||
|
Vivax
22414 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
and the one i'm talking about was not necessarily human specific, but damn if I can actually find the reference >< | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
that's closer than hawthorne but still not it :/ lol well >> I haven't taken physics since...um...good lord...I want to say 2001-2002? and I don't remember that principle in there but that's not saying much 13-14 years later lol | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
The Pygmalion effect, or Rosenthal effect, is the phenomenon whereby the greater the expectation placed upon people, the better they perform.[1] The effect is named after the Greek myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who fell in love with a statue he had carved. A corollary of the Pygmalion effect is the golem effect, in which low expectations lead to a decrease in performance; both effects are forms of self-fulfilling prophecy. By the Pygmalion effect, people internalize their positive labels, and those with positive labels succeed accordingly. The idea behind the Pygmalion effect is that increasing the leader's expectation of the follower's performance will result in better follower performance. Within sociology, the effect is often cited with regard to education and social class. Studies of the Pygmalion effect have been difficult to conduct. Results show a positive correlation between leader expectation and follower performance, but it is argued that the studies are done in an unnatural, manipulated setting. Scientists argue that the perceptions a leader has of a follower cause the Pygmalion effect. The leader's expectations are influenced by their perception of the situation or the followers themselves. Perception and expectation may possibly be found in a similar part in the brain. *throws up her hands* Sorry Rasputin, I know jack all about psychology except the basics (studied biochemistry at uni because I was a glutton for punishment). | ||
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
On March 19 2015 03:25 Trfel wrote: I know that the uncertainty principle has nothing to do with human behavior, but it's the same idea that interacting with something changes its properties. And they teach the uncertainty principle in basic physics classes. http://i.imgur.com/z1DWvNj.jpg The image is huge but is this the futurama version of what you're talking about? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
like I swear hawthorne and Rosenthal/pygmalion were part of my management course in behavioral science...though I guess this is behavioral science... it's just not the right one lolol i'll go with truffle's observer effect - related to the uncertainty principle for now -flops on truffle-' and here's hoping i'm not making some random principle/law up and haven't just sent everyone on a wild goose chase for something that doesn't exist xP | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
| ||
