|
On March 19 2015 09:02 Holyflare wrote:
cool tings slam
anyway, did toad really just disappear?
Nothing to say; always resorts to derision. Always.
Someone, tell me why I SCUMREAD HF, why HF SCUMREAD me, and te supporting points on each side.
I don't think anyone voting me can without either sheeping HF or unvoting and reconsidering.
|
On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? ![[image loading]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/5O3k4fxKARpVS/200.gif) Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar
Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense.
I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early.
I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards
|
On March 19 2015 09:08 Holyflare wrote:
So here we have actual reasons that slam is mafia:
a) Full of crappy bs
b) confirmed lying reasons for voting me
More throwing out claims with no substance to sway opinion.
|
On March 19 2015 09:06 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:03 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:59 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:57 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:50 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:48 Holyflare wrote:
I don't particularly see what's wrong with my logic that serious posts that try and look jokey = mafia. It's not just your meta, it's a general rough tell. Then you overreacted and said it made ME mafia instead of just shrugging it off like a joke. It's seriousness compounded with over-defensiveness and more seriousness. Based solely on your own serious allegation to my own cautions toward jokes along confirmation lines in a big game where people sheep stuff. I won as mafia doing what you are doing. I will not let that ahit fly. you think my serious allegation was a post that had the word "mafia" solely in it? No. The vote and the following postings led to my vote. Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 08:18 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:18 Toadesstern wrote:
sup guyses
For not for I have rolled town and I will lead us to glorious days of dancing under rainbows while lynching all of mafia. Gone are the days when I just showed that I'm blatantly town to everyone and lose nontheless because I trusted people that want to get attention.
For that I ask you to vote to become your mayor so we can slay all of mafia. The position of my personal sheriff is still open and I shall announce the guy or girl that gets that position soon! also mafia that's 2 now mafia listslam toad ^^^^^ This is the ONLY other post that I posted since that post slam,
Who voted first bro?
You did.
If I need to say more say so.
|
And it dies for now.
HF you got your target thus far, you can look into others. I think you saw lhf where it was not however.
|
On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed.
Apparently it is still going.
Like politics.
Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks.
Not going to fly; who voted first?
|
Rayn you suck this game, you didn't read and it will likely bite your ass if anyone reads the dead. Good job.
|
On March 19 2015 09:23 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first? This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you?
Because there was no need. You are mafia; you are using fallacy and wifom to an excess.
|
Also, you ignore any time I said tone sucks, meta (that's not actually true meta because I can alter it at will) sucks, and continued to push for my lynch, successfully because people here have been used to stuff that I want to shake up.
|
On March 19 2015 09:28 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:25 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:23 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
[quote]
Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first? This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you? Because there was no need. You are mafia; you are using fallacy and wifom to an excess. Please outline this to absolutely everyone. Where is my wifom? I thought your post was too serious for slam meta which is a useful heuristic and even if it's not anymore it's a valid general heuristic at the start of the game. I vote you. You vote me for a misunderstanding, thinking I'm voting you for you talking about what you do as mafia. When I clarify it you try and shovel more shit on me instead of admitting flat out you were mistaken. You are still trying to do that. Why.
Because I am NOT mistaken about the fallacies and attempts at deceit that followed, versus statements to that end. And the stubborn holding to your vote, which essentially spurred mine. You seem to conveniently leave that out of your projections of my reasoning.
|
On March 19 2015 09:31 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:29 Alakaslam wrote:
Also, you ignore any time I said tone sucks, meta (that's not actually true meta because I can alter it at will) sucks, and continued to push for my lynch, successfully because people here have been used to stuff that I want to shake up. No, I didn't ignore it. In fact I responded to it directly here: Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 08:33 Holyflare wrote:
Disregarding all meta, your vote is far too serious for anybody of a towny persuasion.
And I addressed this point too. Your vote was early and serious!
|
On March 19 2015 09:34 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:32 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:28 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:25 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:23 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:
[quote]
Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him.
I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first? This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you? Because there was no need. You are mafia; you are using fallacy and wifom to an excess. Please outline this to absolutely everyone. Where is my wifom? I thought your post was too serious for slam meta which is a useful heuristic and even if it's not anymore it's a valid general heuristic at the start of the game. I vote you. You vote me for a misunderstanding, thinking I'm voting you for you talking about what you do as mafia. When I clarify it you try and shovel more shit on me instead of admitting flat out you were mistaken. You are still trying to do that. Why. Because I am NOT mistaken about the fallacies and attempts at deceit that followed, versus statements to that end. And the stubborn holding to your vote, which essentially spurred mine. You seem to conveniently leave that out of your projections of my reasoning. i'm just going to ignore you then because you are just stubborn and will continue to act like this the rest of the game
Or you are lynched. If you are town, let it be a little annoying gnat that bites any time you use fallacy as town, because it opens probability for Mislynch. There is always a logical reason to scumread scum, so stick with the logical whenever you can.
|
Artanis[XP], Why did you leave and why HF over me. Do you feel nothing I have said has any credence?
If HF is town, you are incredibly implicated by it.
|
well that leaves me with only SL to ask
SL
SL is just wifom to me. He needs to die a few times as town and come around to knowledge of the game before I can really do much with him.
I had a policy of lynching him. If no one is going for HF (really hard d1 with good reason, but I reiterate he is 80% Mafia in my eyes) I am not agianst SL lynch.
|
On March 19 2015 09:46 Holyflare wrote:
why on earth do you want to lynch sl if you can't read him at all slam???
I don't particularly want to, I want to lynch you.
You aren't reading me, you are reading into me.
But we have to. That's why I have clarified.
|
On March 19 2015 09:49 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:45 Alakaslam wrote:
well that leaves me with only SL to ask
SL
SL is just wifom to me. He needs to die a few times as town and come around to knowledge of the game before I can really do much with him.
I had a policy of lynching him. If no one is going for HF (really hard d1 with good reason, but I reiterate he is 80% Mafia in my eyes) I am not agianst SL lynch. "not against"...? bruh he lied more than once rofl
yeah but I am not paying attention very well. I am kind of certain of this HF
SO
Who caught it? Where is it?
|
On March 19 2015 09:57 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:57 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:49 Eden1892 wrote:On March 19 2015 09:45 Alakaslam wrote:
well that leaves me with only SL to ask
SL
SL is just wifom to me. He needs to die a few times as town and come around to knowledge of the game before I can really do much with him.
I had a policy of lynching him. If no one is going for HF (really hard d1 with good reason, but I reiterate he is 80% Mafia in my eyes) I am not agianst SL lynch. "not against"...? bruh he lied more than once rofl yeah but I am not paying attention very well. I am kind of certain of this HF SO Who caught it? Where is it? hey guess who caught it you twat
well shit.
|
wait, no no no.
If HF says someone is "lying" and a whole bunch of sheep think so, this says nothing.
|
just went back and read stuff.
Unfortunately it is about a game I wasn't in, but it looks really legit.
And it was right during my argument, so I didn't see the stuff.
Revoting.
|
On March 19 2015 10:02 Holyflare wrote:
Like seriously....?
"I am not agianst SL lynch."
"why are you not against an sl lynch"
"because i want to lynch you!"
"I'm not reading the thread because i'm so certain on hf!"
^ somehow you know you want to lynch sl (for unknown reasons still because you didn't even answer me) and you ignore the entire thread where you might be wrong on me even though i've found this guy lying twice AND QUOTED IT
and NOW you are trying to get people OFF of SL because I am pushing it WITHOUT EVEN READING THE QUOTES OR GAMES YOURSELF
wtfh slam
I did answer you. SL is a lynch I am not against, nor for. You keep saying I am for it, you obviously don't believe me.
Also, my reason for not being against SL lynch was a policy I held where I wanted him lynched all the time. But he has been in games since then, so I shouldn't stick with it.
I am not trying to move anyone off SL, I simply stated that because you were the one who caught the lie, it might actually just be a "lie" (you have been repeatedly claiming that I lie) and had to check it out first.
Now, it appears to be unverifiable by me but very likely to be true since other players are involved and it is technically verifiable- for someone with more time.
HF, you will have to slow down with me as I write very lazily. I avoid punctuation, and I have an odd manner of speaking to begin with.
That simple statement is the backstory of Chupazi in a couple sentences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
EPT
