EPTOn March 22 2015 08:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I have 3 conspiracy theories but I don't want to trigger Vivax.
I have 3 conspiracy theories but I don't want to trigger Vivax.
Come on dude, I'm a man of science.
TL Mafia LXX: Guardians of the Galaxy - Page 20
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
Come on dude, I'm a man of science. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 08:33 Trfel wrote: Ok, I can't think of anything I can gain from withholding my information I tracked someone who visited Holyflare. By my look at the role list in the OP, this person must either be scum or alignment cop. And for obvious reasons, I don't want to out the alignment cop. Would you accept it if someone alignment checked Holyflare, or would claiming such be considered claiming scum? I think only an idiot wouldhave checked HF. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 08:38 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Actually I think you should make the claim as late as possible because this extra information will make it really hard for mafia to appear natural. At latest halfway through D1, enough EoD shenannies. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 08:44 Breshke wrote: Also do people think mafia double stacked HF or stacked with a "vigi" on VE. I'm missing a lot of pages but i don't see a reason why mafia would have shot VE other than to help/throw doubt on a vigi Toad claimed vigi shooting VE. For all you know there could be a jailer who protected somebody. And he should stfu about it. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
It's like 99 % mafia. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 08:54 Artanis[Xp] wrote: No, Trfel withholding the information is great and we need to stop discussing it and actually get on with our reads because the interactions we make now are going to be all the more interesting then. "Get on with our reads". After you. I'm not forming my reads on incomplete information. I'm also interested into Toad's argument why I shouldn't have shot Alakaslam cause deadline and shit. Like he's supposed to know when I sent in the shot, and what my decision was. This tunnel is getting too tunnelly for my taste. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 08:59 rsoultin wrote: well that implicates rayn too xP Not in the slightiest? | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 09:00 rsoultin wrote: one of the "tracker's" scumreads was selected to carry KP? lolol that or it says scum is dumb xP And if rayn was right on multiple scum you could use the same argument. I had pretty much the same reads as him. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 09:02 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm pretty sure that makes Onegu confirmed town. Seems likely mafia tried to take out both Onegu/HF to get rid of two in their eyes confirmed towns because of the mason claims. More likely than Onegu fakeclaiming mason in any case. Affirmative | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
I made my decision 2 h before deadline, without sending an action in previously and also never wavering from my decision. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
I'm a man of science. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 09:08 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also if you think all mafia do exactly the same and line up on the same boat I don't know exactly what to say. Well in the context in which it happened it made a lot of sense, since all of you guys who ended up piling on me had exactly three votes per person before you fueled the wagon on me. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
Was a pleasure to nail scum D1. Good night gentlechaps. | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 10:03 Artanis[Xp] wrote: If only HF told us why SL wasn't scum before he died, that could've been most helpful. meh still here. Why not Alakaslam? | ||
|
Vivax
22089 Posts
On March 22 2015 10:01 Artanis[Xp] wrote: That means there's 4 scum in SL/Slam/Exo/Breshke/Superbia/Palmar/Rayn. Sounds solvable. Wanted to quote this. | ||
| ||
