EPTI wanna hear VE's opinion first.
Mafia Mini Mafia: a miniature game of mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I wanna hear VE's opinion first. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 21:38 KelsierSC wrote: My reads on VE and CF are both well developed , maybe look at the content of them or ask a question if there is something you don't understand. A part of your case on VE is that he called my case good and read me town for it, you are calling my case aswell so why would VE be MAFIA for reading me town there? The rest of your case on VE is basically because you do not know why he posts what he does. Hell you even say that in your case multiple times... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 21:39 KelsierSC wrote: To add on to my read on captain fail. The impression I got reading the thread is that the most forceful push here is HF pushing on GB so how CF got a read of hf "sitting back" makes absolutely no sense. cpt fail had that read before HF's push..... are you reading the thread backwards like Palmar sometimes does? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 21:14 KelsierSC wrote: Apparently MM1 is dripping with mafia. ok would be good to get an explanation of it. But then he switches to GB for no reason that I can see, and again I believe that VE can not think the case made by HF is actually good. And then a switch onto GB without an explanation, I don't think he can believe the case from HF is good. This also feels like an overjustification of a switch. Like "LOOK I SWITCHED WHICH IS WHAT MAFIA WOULDN'T DO, PAY ATTENTION" it's like he is trying to get ahead of someone calling him scummy. The green parts here are reasonable. The red parts are not given the green parts, why would you ever post the green parts in this post if you actually have a reasonable explanation for those actions? Like what i read from your post here is "you are wondering" why VE does some stuff, but then you come to a conclusion right after. You can't do the both, you either do not know or you do have a conclusion. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
the reason i think this post is mafia motivated is not because of what i said in my last post (or rather what i quoted from Kelsier). The quoted part is okay, the opening for that part is not, because it is "this is why i think VE is mafia" -- as the tells he represent are null (while worth asking about) and in my opinion it is quite clear Kelsier implies what do those points he represent mean regarding VE's alignment (despite what he says in the end). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
... in my opinion it is quite clear Kelsier implies what do those points he represent mean regarding VE's alignment (despite what he says in the end). --> this is supposed to mean imo how the post is worded implies he doesn't just get why VE says the stuff he does despite him "reaching a conclusion in the end". | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 22:08 KelsierSC wrote: My case in ve has nothing to do with you. I'm saying he doesn't actually believe the case on Gb . I made that clear I'm sure when i called him mafia Well i am sorry but you just said your case on VE has something to do with me. If you think VE does not believe the case on GB you should give some concrete reasoning that makes you think so because "he just switched his vote for no reasoning" in fact suggests that he DOES believe in the case... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 22:15 KelsierSC wrote: Yeh he shouldn't have read you town for the reason he did. How does this make sense given these are the facts: - VE townreads me - You townread me - VE thinks my case is good - You think my case is good how? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
 | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 06 2015 22:59 Mocsta wrote: i dont think rayn emulates that as scum??? I don't know tbh. You'd have to check since i don't remember much of my scumgames lately. I basically have not given any fucks about the game when i have been mafia on TL in the past year. Except for that last game where i was modkilled on N1. Don't remember the game name. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/471815-russia-today-mini-mafia Probably the best scumgame i have ever played (D1). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
| ||
