[M][N]The Void Mafia - Page 2

On January 20 2015 23:17 marvellosity wrote:
it's ok, Oats, 2 players who are far stronger than you agree on a read.

On January 20 2015 23:19 marvellosity wrote:

He's also not pursued it at all.

Basically HF hasn't pursued something further than it was worth pursuing, and that's quite a good sign. (wile, you)

On January 20 2015 23:23 Vivax wrote:
I'll just sheep marv and HF on SL today and if we get a town flip I'm rolling up my theory again.

If SL flips scum I'm scumreading Kelsier for him being oblivious to the points on SL AND for being on the sideleines defending marv when we were fighting. Cause that's the sort of thing scum does.

On January 20 2015 23:24 Holyflare wrote:


The thread had 2 pages since the start of the game when I arrived so I started discussion like crazy, your posting has improved markedly so I dropped you and put you in some arbitrary townyish pile. The same as wile e. who seemed quite genuine when he said he had no proper reads on people.

You were pointing out things that make damdred look scummy. You were voting marv for a joke. You then pointed out things that make damdred's vote and talk about marv seem like it was easy to town read marv because he knows it's a town marv. You then say marv can be bussed and that's why your vote was still on him (even though it was a joke)? wut? by everything you were talking about and pointing out it looks like you would be thinking marv was town and damd mafia but maintained your vote on marv for no reason.

On January 20 2015 23:55 Vivax wrote:


Make a case on me being scum or fuck off.
Also nice that you're dodging the SL issues to focus on me not reading things.

On January 21 2015 09:20 batsnacks wrote:


The person you replaced was one of the leading proponents of his lynch. Are you sure?

On January 21 2015 10:36 Vivax wrote:
Oats says: He picked Damdred cause it was his last post he saw.

Before he said:


If this is true he should have picked on me and Wile first.




Oats:


So he disagrees about the strategy of starting a wagon on the best scumplayer on the forum being good.

COMMENTS. DO SOME WORK PEOPLE.

I really don't want to play a game where past performance is way more important that in game performance or people are specifically targeted because of a certain reason.

If this is true he should have picked on me and Wile first.

On January 21 2015 14:15 Vivax wrote:


Oatsmaster what the fuck are you doing all this game.
I didn't see you cast a vote once.

It's like you don't have scumreads.

But when it's about defending sicklucker you and himself seem to be scumbuddies.

Name me three scumreads now.

On January 21 2015 20:03 Wile E. Coyote wrote:

Maybe later when I have more time. None of those strikes me as an awful lynch though.

On January 21 2015 21:39 batsnacks wrote:


I played with him as scum once a while ago and it was nothing like this. I don't remember what game it was or I'd link it.

On January 21 2015 21:50 Koshi wrote:

Show me the game.

On January 21 2015 21:59 Koshi wrote:
Can somebody please explain to me why Oats is voting Vivax under the motto "Vivax does crazy shit as scum" because he remembers some game Vivax played 500 years ago. While Oats ignored the recent 250436 games in which Vivax is batshit crazy as town and pretty calculated as scum.

On January 21 2015 23:49 Damdred wrote:
Oats is another good scum suspect for me, just looking at random posts he looks so/so in the thread but when you look into his filter, he has a ton of one liners. He sits on the side line and he sometimes like with the SL comments throws a bit more gas on the fire. His biggest contribution during the game is jumping on me for what he thinks is not a way to scum hunt basically. Hes picked at people who are generally being scum read by the thread and get pressure, besides his sudden lets lynch bats he really hasn't contributed anything note worthy to the thread.

Decent lynch for today.