[M][N]The Void Mafia - Page 10

On January 22 2015 05:40 Wile E. Coyote wrote:

How often did you play with oats?

On January 22 2015 05:43 Damdred wrote:
That's the problem you don't need a huge case with tons of quotes to be a good case.

I could say Marv is mafia because he only eats fish as mafia and he ate fish in the thread therefore he is mafia.

That is a good case, it doesn't need 10 yards of proof to make it true because it is true if you read the filter and see the proof. Quote cases leads to bias being built and narratives and many people skip over the important pieces.

On January 22 2015 05:46 Wile E. Coyote wrote:

Hm, ok. In my experience oats is usually really under the radar as mafia and often survives the longest on his team while as a townie he is very controversial and often mislynched.

On January 22 2015 05:47 Half the Sky wrote:


First, I said before my scum read was a weak read.
Vivax asked me a question to help him come up with a read on you. I responded.
If someone brings something up, I'm going to examine it.
If Vivax is taking things out of context I will actually have further reason to scumread him.
If you have a problem with his read or his case, defend yourself. It's that simple.

On January 22 2015 05:49 Damdred wrote:
The reason you townread oats is because he called me bad, which you agreed with and most of the thread disagreed with oats and called the reasoning sound.

You can't look at his filter and tell me concisely who he is scum reading and why. He gives a random lynch of people that barely show up in his filter at all and once I post against him he instantly votes me and leaves.

he has no semblance of scum hunting at all and is being totally useless and you town read him. k

On January 22 2015 05:50 Damdred wrote:


no...no he really hasn't been controversial for oats hes been really on the side lines and just randomly throwing thing sin

On January 22 2015 05:52 sicklucker wrote:


Rly? Thats probably a really bad idea if your serious and hes kind of toned it down

On January 22 2015 00:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
Case on me that is bad and doesnt make any fucking sense at all.

On January 22 2015 06:00 Koshi wrote:
I am up for lian or alakaslam. Maybe Oats.

Nobody else except if we feel fancy and go take out HF/Will.E.

for funzies.

On January 22 2015 06:03 sicklucker wrote:
So are we not killing hts today? is this off the table

On January 22 2015 06:07 sicklucker wrote:
I kind of want to vote lian as much as hts out of spite. Maybe more. I mean can anyone blame me?

On January 22 2015 06:16 Damdred wrote:
we are lynching Oats today, I will put this in bullet points so that people can follow along

* Oats starts the game off by saying something is bad without any explanation and leaving the game.
* He comes back and defends his view which some agree with and some don't and never draws conclusions from this
* He never explains why he wants to lynch anyone or why he scum reads people
* During fights or arguments he adds fuel to the fire in SLs case he makes it very clear that he thinks SL is lying and heaps more pressure on him.
* Is not voting a scum read but came back said a case on him was bad put his vote down on the person who made the case said it was bad and left without explanation
* is not being controversial but more side lines and flying under the radar, is not scum hunting

Oats is scum vote for him.

On January 22 2015 06:16 Half the Sky wrote:
Kels, did you not read what I said before? Or are you choosing to ignore it like you apparently are with Vivax?

Based on my latest scumreads, the ones that Koshi asked, I would go for Lian, possibly Oats.

On January 22 2015 07:01 Holyflare wrote:
let's start some main wagon so people don't do last minute stuff because right now it's crazy scum favoured