Student Mafia V - Page 23

On January 27 2015 13:06 DarthPunk wrote:


They have to do with my read on you. Just go about your business.

On January 25 2015 02:41 Damdred wrote:
Rsoultin doing POE this is where I am currently

JarJar
Rsoultin
DP
Shining/Breshke

Geript
LM

If you had to pick two people I was most wrong about which two would it be?

On January 24 2015 06:08 Damdred wrote:
Honestly the reason I never analyzed your post was because you called dp scum on it then buddies him later so I never bothered to read it. By pie you are scum. I'll answer the rest later, but still scum reading someone for changing stances is bs and you know it.

Look how you react you are disconnected at points not even knowing that most of the reasons breshke brings up for lm that you call good have already been stated in thread? That's total lack of reading right there, yet its good then but bad ealier.

and no this is different at times you make this huge effort to look towny when you need to be and then you go back into this idgaf mood where you do jack shit. Its more like Russian mafia than any of your town games shrug

On January 19 2015 06:07 Damdred wrote:
Granted I've never seen dp as mafia so I can't compare what he's doing here. But he has follow up to questions does research on LS to find his meta and change his read. He woke up at God awful time just for deadline, I don't have to read someone a filter to town read then if I like their thread prwacense.
Jarjar isn't really finding Scum and caught him in a lie about me voting GB when I never did. The slight Scum slip. And he's not really hinting so yea.

On January 27 2015 14:00 geript wrote:

Nah I think he's town. If I just happily waddled my way into his pocket free of charge, then that's my fault. I've reread his filter. There are a few alarm bells, but 95% of it is exactly how I remember him playing as town.

On January 27 2015 14:42 DarthPunk wrote:


Your reasoning and rationale for your no lynch was inconsistent. You said you would no lynch but actually wanted to lynch damdred.

You said you wanted to no-lynch in case geript and I were scum together.

You said you wanted to no lynch to have more time to dive filters and figure out the game.

Then When I asked you why you wanted to no lynch you said it was because of me and geript.



Which was bullshit because you had not once mentioned that as the reason.

Not once.

The main thing I was suspect of you over was the fact that you said you didn't want to lynch today because you wanted more time to figure out the game, and then you were not doing anything of the sort. You were not making cases and diving filters like you wanted to and which was your rationale //at one point// for a no lynch.

But then when you said you were gonna be diving filters and solving the game your behaviour became more consistent with your stated desires.

You then happily shit up the thread with geript and are basically still tunnelling damdred.

So really I don;t see you doing the kind of things you said were the reasons you wanted more time that the no lynch would provide you with.

Like your filter dive and case making came down to a few posts tunneling damdred some more, you are not trying to figure anything out past that point even though you argued at length that you wanted to no lynch for that reason.

Anyway that is what my suspicions were over.

On January 27 2015 14:43 DarthPunk wrote:


I specifically asked you to tell me why you wanted to no lynch and you said something you had never ever mentioned previously and ignored all your previous reasoning entirely.

On January 27 2015 14:53 DarthPunk wrote:


Did I say they were mutually exclusive. no I said your stated reasons were inconsistent. Like if someone asks you why you want to no lynch, why would you talk about something that you have never stated before and ignore everything else. Why would you not also include those reasons when specifically asked?

Well because you are bullshitting your reasons for wanting the no lynch IMO.