|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:37 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 06:33 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 06:31 sicklucker wrote:On January 03 2015 06:29 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 06:28 sicklucker wrote:
Like this game is actually madness. My only decent town reads left are like marv and robik and now they want to kill each other. wtf you townread eden,dam ,artanis and drH enough to vote on bats. i mean sure but from my pov its unlikely everyone was town in a mislynch. There also trying to all bury me. Im still leaning town but not strong on eden artanis doc. I just completely recend my dandred read. That was a weak early read he has not really backed it up. so me and palmar are no longer town now either? why did robick and marv become town aswell? Na your probably still town. But you do lose some points attacking an easy mislynch harder the anyone else. Palmer just completely fell off the world. I have no idea what he is anymore he spent the whole time blaming others and not helping find scum. Im also less sure on gerit because if that mislynch wa stown driven then most likely both horses are town. And my main reason to town read palmer was his drive to kill him.
If you think my cases against the late voters is unwarranted I would be glad to hear it.
But you also don't read any of those town reads as town anymore so clearly something struck home with you.
give me scum out of
robik,eden,dam
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:39 IAmRobik wrote:
Town leading a mislynch off of geript doesn't make geript more town. Can you use your brain before you post. Please and thank you
who said this?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:41 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 06:40 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 06:39 IAmRobik wrote:
Town leading a mislynch off of geript doesn't make geript more town. Can you use your brain before you post. Please and thank you who said this? Sicklucker just did
ah yeh see it now sorry
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:45 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 06:43 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 06:40 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Geript doesnt need to vote to save himself all he has to do is uhhh have a teammate vote for bats right? In what world is that a reach That's not very plausible to me. Why would the scumteam sacrifice another player if geript could just do the job himself without looking any scummier for it? If we lynch geript at some point the buddy who hammers bats looks awful. Yeah, sicklucker will look awful when we lynch geript. I'd do the same thing if I was geript. Switch votes to try to cause chaos cause I know I'm fucked no matter what happens. If a buddy can hide in the votes it's fine and the way sicklucker avoided responsibility for his vote by not giving real reasons for it and then moaning about how bad the game is fucked after is all wrong. Geript also could have switched from vivax to sicklucker if he needed to, who says he wasn't watching the votes closely ready to switch at the last second?
do you mean bats?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 06:46 sicklucker wrote:
Why would I save a team mate who wont save himself? Ask yourself that doctor Good point. Everyone who voted for batsnacks is confirmed town, especially you
lol
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:51 sicklucker wrote:
No like hes not. Im to arrogant to help a scum team mate who gave up played horrible and wont even vote to save himself. Like fuck that shit I would let him burn. If I continue to bus gerit Im like instantly town read by the entire game because I was the first person to push him.
If I wanted to just get town read I stay on gerit. Theres only town motivation for sheeping my town reads.
you didnt push him mate you just said some early bullshit that no one took seriously
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 06:54 sicklucker wrote:
If I stick my vote on gerit and he flips mafia your terrible if you dont semi clear me. He tried to stick scum on me several times, I made him look terrible on several occasions if it were not for me and his half ass attacks on me no one would even vote him.
was your vote on gerit at the deadline?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 07:08 sicklucker wrote:
Like your focusing on shit things. If im town I cant figure out whats going on in gerits head. Hes definitely conceding tho. That could be as town or mafia. He later explain his vote and I kinda believe him? But at the time it looked like he was trying to kill himself. And like I dont think mafia does that ever when they can vote to kill a town.
all your posts stink of wifom and you trying to clear yourself with poor logic.
you argue that there is no way that you and geript can be scum because about 3 pages into d1 you made some jokey post that no one took seriously.
Again one of the main things that is scummy is you are just obsessed with trying to clear people, mostly yourself and tell people how towny you are and all the towny things you have apparently done.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 08:39 Eden1892 wrote:
And in the meantime, can someone explain what was so bad about the batsnacks lynch? I still think it was acceptable and the only bad part about it was the flip. Still think my case on batsnacks was okay and I feel like it's a little cheap that a bunch of people logged on after batsnacks flipped and waxed poetic about how terrible a lynch it was without even engaging what was (in my perhaps-biased opinion) the most influential singular post in getting him killed.
Like if everyone's going to decree this lynch bad, it seems like questioning me about my case would be an obvious starting point to finding out if the batsnacks lynch was town- or mafia-driven. I was the most outspoken singular person in the final hour of the day for killing batsnacks, I wrote the biggest case that people seemed to follow. Yet as far as I'm aware not one of the people complaining about the lynch has asked me anything about it. It makes all this gnashing of teeth about the lynch ring incredibly hollow, like people are complaining about it because it's the in thing to do instead of trying to figure out what it means for the game.
I didn't realise you were here but yes I want to look at your case again
look at the case SL and dam made and especiaally look at how scummy SL has been (my case) and then you can understand why that lynch was bad.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Eden you made this giant post on bats with 3 reasons for calling him scum. I think your second case is good because I made it.
My question is this. If you have 3 reasons for calling bats scum right at the deadline why didn't you bother to read him or make a case on him earlier.
It feels like TMI
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 08:50 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 08:46 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 08:39 Eden1892 wrote:
And in the meantime, can someone explain what was so bad about the batsnacks lynch? I still think it was acceptable and the only bad part about it was the flip. Still think my case on batsnacks was okay and I feel like it's a little cheap that a bunch of people logged on after batsnacks flipped and waxed poetic about how terrible a lynch it was without even engaging what was (in my perhaps-biased opinion) the most influential singular post in getting him killed.
Like if everyone's going to decree this lynch bad, it seems like questioning me about my case would be an obvious starting point to finding out if the batsnacks lynch was town- or mafia-driven. I was the most outspoken singular person in the final hour of the day for killing batsnacks, I wrote the biggest case that people seemed to follow. Yet as far as I'm aware not one of the people complaining about the lynch has asked me anything about it. It makes all this gnashing of teeth about the lynch ring incredibly hollow, like people are complaining about it because it's the in thing to do instead of trying to figure out what it means for the game. I didn't realise you were here but yes I want to look at your case again look at the case SL and dam made and especiaally look at how scummy SL has been (my case) and then you can understand why that lynch was bad. Why would their cases matter for the lynch being bad? Unless their cases are better than mine, and are still bad, they seem irrelevant. Sorry but I'm not going to be convinced a lynch I pushed and wrote a big case for is bad by being redirected to other people writing cases for the same lynch. I know you're saying you want to look at it again, would you care to do so and talk to me about mine, please?
right at the deadline a bunch of people who have done nothing come forward and jump on a bandwagon with really bad reads and it doesn't give you pause.
alright.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 08:53 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 08:50 KelsierSC wrote:
Eden you made this giant post on bats with 3 reasons for calling him scum. I think your second case is good because I made it.
My question is this. If you have 3 reasons for calling bats scum right at the deadline why didn't you bother to read him or make a case on him earlier.
It feels like TMI Someone else brought him up as a possible kill when there was roughly an hour or so left. I want to say Artanis without looking, but I don't know. I don't remember remembering anything batsnacks had done to that point, and I remember saying I would read batsnacks instead of someone else (I think Lazermonkey and Vivax?). I read his filter, examined the context of the posts I thought were important and made the case in a larger post. I certainly wouldn't call it "right at the deadline," I think I made it with about 50 minutes left in the day, with at least a half-dozen people online to see it. Close, but not so close that people didn't have time to evaluate it for themselves. I have to admit I don't really understand where your question is going.
my point is this. You have absolutely nothing on bats and no read but then you come up with a whole bunch of reasons to scum read him. Why weren't you looking at him earlier since you were such a headless chicken before then.
why does point 1 make bats scummy? why does point 3?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
you basicaa
lly said everything bats had done in the game was scummy. but you hadn't noticed it before someone else decided to lynch him.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 08:58 IAmRobik wrote:
Kelsersc, can you explain the TMI part of your accusation on Eden? Do you know what TMI even means?
yes
he has 3 reasons instaantly to scum read bats, everything bats did was scummy apparenty
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 09:02 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 08:59 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 08:58 IAmRobik wrote:
Kelsersc, can you explain the TMI part of your accusation on Eden? Do you know what TMI even means? yes he has 3 reasons instaantly to scum read bats, everything bats did was scummy apparenty and how is that tmi. in fact, Eden wanting to lynch batsnacks was a serious case of TLI
yes that is exactly what I am saying
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 09:02 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 08:59 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 08:58 IAmRobik wrote:
Kelsersc, can you explain the TMI part of your accusation on Eden? Do you know what TMI even means? yes he has 3 reasons instaantly to scum read bats, everything bats did was scummy apparenty You have one more chance: what is tmi and how does it apply to your case against Eden. Hint: + Show Spoiler +
he provides too much information on bats.
he is saying everything bats has done is scummy which isnt the case. he did some scummy things.
is this you playing good? when does that happen?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 09:34 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 09:32 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 09:02 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 08:59 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 08:58 IAmRobik wrote:
Kelsersc, can you explain the TMI part of your accusation on Eden? Do you know what TMI even means? yes he has 3 reasons instaantly to scum read bats, everything bats did was scummy apparenty and how is that tmi. in fact, Eden wanting to lynch batsnacks was a serious case of TLI yes that is exactly what I am saying You are aware that Palmar is saying that Eden is probably town?
I thought palmar wrote tmi not tli
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
eden you case was roughly
1) bats read on robik was weird
2) his misrepresenting chyz
3) his last pages not having anything substantiaal
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
