|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate.
gg no re
|
On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate.
Was night1. You consistently townread breshke day1/night1.
|
So it comes down to who does what you say and who doesn't for you then
|
On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome
I'm not awesome.
I'm just explaining that the people who lynched batsnacks are terrible.
|
On January 03 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome I'm not awesome.
Really? 
Then I shouldn't listen to you tomorrow I guess?
|
On January 03 2015 05:52 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate. Was night1. You consistently townread breshke day1/night1.
So what, didn't I lynch mafia day 1?
It was a good thing we didn't lynch Broski. Stop arguing this, you can go back through like million games. I consistently admit that I always miss one mafia. That doesn't mean you should try to lynch the one townread of mine that happens to be mafia. It's still bad play.
|
On January 03 2015 05:54 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome I'm not awesome. Really? Then I shouldn't listen to you tomorrow I guess?
You wouldn't anyway, as I'm voting you.
|
Geript is the person who needs to be defending himself. Vivax did a sloppy job trying to make JAT look scummy earlier, I'm inclined to think he really believed in his read.
|
On January 03 2015 05:54 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:52 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate. Was night1. You consistently townread breshke day1/night1. So what, didn't I lynch mafia day 1? It was a good thing we didn't lynch Broski. Stop arguing this, you can go back through like million games. I consistently admit that I always miss one mafia. That doesn't mean you should try to lynch the one townread of mine that happens to be mafia. It's still bad play.
i hate this post
|
On January 03 2015 03:32 KelsierSC wrote:
oh yeh and SL claiming he had "mad cold feet"
not fucking really dude. Think JAt called that shit out already.
On January 02 2015 13:46 sicklucker wrote:
Ya geript wtf was that vote explain yourself I can easily hammer you now if I want to because your not voting bats
Your so wrong like me and jat had the cold feet heres eden trying to make sure we keep are votes
On January 02 2015 13:52 Eden1892 wrote:
JAT, sicklucker, let's sort out geript later. You guys are no better than batsnacks if you spite-vote geript for a stealth vote
|
On January 03 2015 05:54 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:52 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate. Was night1. You consistently townread breshke day1/night1. So what, didn't I lynch mafia day 1? It was a good thing we didn't lynch Broski. Stop arguing this, you can go back through like million games. I consistently admit that I always miss one mafia. That doesn't mean you should try to lynch the one townread of mine that happens to be mafia. It's still bad play.
Good point. I concede.
|
if he came to have a scumread on your townread why would voting for them be a bad idea? if it was successful it's still a bad idea because it makes your reads seem less perfect? fuck off with that
|
On January 02 2015 13:49 sicklucker wrote:
I wanna spite vote geript now
|
On January 03 2015 05:55 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:54 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:52 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:50 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:47 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:46 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:39 justanothertownie wrote:
Batsnacks was not playing his towngame. It was obviously a bad lynch since he was town but don't even try to sell that it was an obvious mislynch, Palmar. Yes it was, "he was not playing his towngame" is not a thing. You have to demonstrate why what he is doing makes him mafia. That is what I did. And I just quoted the only post you ever made about batsnacks. Does not look like an obvious townread to me. it's a townread, sure he had posted like 15 words or something, so it was never going to be strong. But you just don't lynch my townreads on day 1. Never. You mean like bunnies shouldn't have shot Breshke last game, eh? wasn't day 1. Checkmate. Was night1. You consistently townread breshke day1/night1. So what, didn't I lynch mafia day 1? It was a good thing we didn't lynch Broski. Stop arguing this, you can go back through like million games. I consistently admit that I always miss one mafia. That doesn't mean you should try to lynch the one townread of mine that happens to be mafia. It's still bad play. i hate this post
I care this || much
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome I'm not awesome. I'm just explaining that the people who lynched batsnacks are terrible.
So reading through the lynch.
I had a scum read on bats, a few others did.
Then JAT was like "lets lynch bats"
then random fuckwads came out the woodwork and lynched bats for bad reasons/no reasons/ every thing he said reason (eden)
So if i'm JAT in that position I would be like fuck this and go back to geript. assuming JAT is good.
JAT you even said something like
"why are you people here now" or "this feels bad"
just explain why the alarm bells didn't go off and make you switch.
|
On January 03 2015 05:54 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:54 justanothertownie wrote:On January 03 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome I'm not awesome. Really? Then I shouldn't listen to you tomorrow I guess? You wouldn't anyway, as I'm voting you.
Then you are even more terrible than I am.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 03 2015 05:55 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 03:32 KelsierSC wrote:
oh yeh and SL claiming he had "mad cold feet"
not fucking really dude. Think JAt called that shit out already. Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 13:46 sicklucker wrote:
Ya geript wtf was that vote explain yourself I can easily hammer you now if I want to because your not voting bats Your so wrong like me and jat had the cold feet heres eden trying to make sure we keep are votes Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 13:52 Eden1892 wrote:
JAT, sicklucker, let's sort out geript later. You guys are no better than batsnacks if you spite-vote geript for a stealth vote
if you had such cold feet why didnt you switch?
|
On January 03 2015 05:56 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:On January 03 2015 05:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Do you want to move on and lynch geript tomorrow Palmar or have you done enough of convincing us that you're awesome I'm not awesome. I'm just explaining that the people who lynched batsnacks are terrible. So reading through the lynch. I had a scum read on bats, a few others did. Then JAT was like "lets lynch bats" then random fuckwads came out the woodwork and lynched bats for bad reasons/no reasons/ every thing he said reason (eden) So if i'm JAT in that position I would be like fuck this and go back to geript. assuming JAT is good. JAT you even said something like "why are you people here now" or "this feels bad" just explain why the alarm bells didn't go off and make you switch.
this is better
|
On January 03 2015 03:35 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2015 03:30 KelsierSC wrote:On January 03 2015 03:18 Damdred wrote:
Ok i've went over the games of superbia, the two newbie games, fanfic and two mafia games ffl2 and 2p2. (And ate some yummy chinese)
My initial premise is incorrect when I go over the other games.
After some consideration I decided to throw out ffl2 for a couple of reasons, it was not normal for superbia in the sense that he replaced in during the night phase of d1 after batsnacks had gotten lynched for being unrememberable and a few other things (bats was scum here) and had a good many pages to catch up on. Rayn got killed during the night and robik and myself got mod killed (I was mafia) so super really did not have time to spam up the game in any way.
In the newbie games and fanfic it was about the same length, mostly consisting on one liners and some insightful thoughts. Usually came out to 3 pages or so a day besides the 2nd newbie where he averaged 4 pages or so. Which is right in line with his town play but always put his thoughs out their from what i read.
I did notice that even in the game i think isn't good for analysis amount of posts that super likes to bus a bit and make list posts that generally are scum reading all the team mates so if we lynch superbia at any point and he flips scum ritoky is a good place to look, but now isn't the time for associative reads.
The other thing was that besides ffl2 the posting was about on the same pace as the town games but mostly going with the flow.
Soon as super starts posting more I can determine better but I haven't seen in any games super play the lurky role. right... so whats the point? dam who are the scum who voted on bats The point is that, I told Koshi (as I said before) that I was goin to check out superbias past games and try to find if this sort of lurking and sticking votes is alignment indicative because of a past experience I had in ffl2. And I posted the results I found and I was wrong. Batsnacks (7): Justanothertownie, Eden1892, DoctorHelvetica, Artanis[XP], Damdred, sicklucker, IAmRobik These are the people who voted bats. I think that SL, Robik had the least amount of reasons to jump on bats. Some of the reasons that they posted were that they were sheeping basically. Eden and myself look the worst because we told everyone who was thinking about jumping to sit and wait for the flip. SL I think would be the scum there especially since he was the hammer vote I believe and even though he stated he wanted to hammer geript he didn't do it then sounded pretty smug after the flip.
Robiks vote was literally a toss away vote and hes town for it. No mafia throws a useless last second vote on a town about to flip EVER. Robik is like the most confirmed town in this game
|
On January 03 2015 05:55 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
if he came to have a scumread on your townread why would voting for them be a bad idea? if it was successful it's still a bad idea because it makes your reads seem less perfect? fuck off with that
No because generally (and I say generally, maybe I'm completely wrong on everything this game? who knows?) if I throw out like 6-10 townreads there's usually only going to be 1 mafia in there. Again, maybe this is the game where I get everything wrong, but let's assume it's not.
Just from a statistical point of view it's better to lynch outside the players I've townread, because if most of the townreads are correct (even if 1 or maybe 2 are wrong) there's going to be more mafia in the remaining players.
But I cba arguing this.
batsnacks was a terrible lynch.
Now all my reads are fucked up and I will be awful for the rest of the game because I can't tell dumb from scum. Here's to hoping mafia just shoots me to rid town of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
