| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:12 LightningStrike wrote: rsoultin just made a case on GB a couple posts ago for next Day lynch. How you feel about the case rsoultin made for GB lynch for next Day lynch? I mean the After today's lynch in case you didn't read it right because my wording of it was bad. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Who's up for another target? | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:22 GlowingBear wrote: I don't want to lynch ritoky today and maybe not holyflare. Who's up for another target? Are you serious? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Yes. Let's do it? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:37 rsoultin wrote: Care to comment on any of the points on my case on you GB? If not ritoky, I will be voting you as it stands, for the reasons mentioned in the case. I haven't read it because, as I know I'm town, any points brought against me are automatically wrong. Anyway, is there something in there you think an explanation would be good? | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
Mind explaining why you want to move off a confirmed mafia and your top scum read? | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:12 LightningStrike wrote: rsoultin just made a case on GB a couple posts ago for next Day lynch. How you feel about the case rsoultin made for GB lynch for next Day lynch? Read the post you quoted or my earlier post (TLDR: agreed). | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
.... What's this supposed to mean GB? | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:45 Xatalos wrote: Read the post you quoted or my earlier post (TLDR: agreed). I didn't read it carefully on your post T_T I think the case is very solid from rsoultin and if ritoky doesn't get lynched today(unlikely) I would go for GB or Tubesock but more on GB since the GB case is much better than my stuff for Tubesock. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On December 16 2014 22:42 GlowingBear wrote: I haven't read it because, as I know I'm town, any points brought against me are automatically wrong. Anyway, is there something in there you think an explanation would be good? I find your move here interesting. You may wish to take a look at the very last small paragraph in my case, as to why I think it's funny that you don't want to pursue a lynch against either ritoky or HF right now. If you can't be bothered to read it and clarify your behavior this game, that's up to you. Most of the points I have questioned you about before, with a few exceptions here and there and a few quotes that hadn't stood out to me when you initially said them. ritoky very clearly stepped in it. He is trying to explain that away now. He was not and never could have been notified of his action being interfered with, his pre-emptive claim was never very townie (something oddly enough that you mentioned multiple times before inexplicably changing your tunnel to HF for a gut feeling), so why not vote him? He seems to be the clear choice for lynch here. Even if he is telling the truth about having never taken a shot, why not just say so? It still wouldn't have looked good, but then at least he wouldn't be in the position of trying to get people to trust an admitted liar. | ||
|
Vivax
22158 Posts
For me, Oats is more obvious scum than him. So that's where I'm placing my vote. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On December 16 2014 23:19 Vivax wrote: Ritoky is a policy lynch, nothing more, so stop disguising it as a lynch for scumminess. There's neither a special scum nor town motivation in what he did. As scum he could've claimed to not have shot without repercussions, as town he should have claimed to not have shot. What I see as a point against his lynch is the vote on Kelsier which had real impact on the lynch (as long as HF isn't scum at least) For me, Oats is more obvious scum than him. So that's where I'm placing my vote. Riddle me this. If HF is revealed as town, what happens? Just hypothetically. And what is the town motivation for lying? A townie might conceal his own role, perhaps, but lying about taking a shot and being roleblocked. What is the town motivation for that? What is the town motivation for throwing out a name of someone who has been shot at? So what about Oats is obvious scum then, Vivax? I remember you going balls to the wall on Xata earlier, but it seems that the case against Oats is...he hasn't posted much? Is that not a "policy lynch"? Please enlighten us. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
Fine and fair enough. If you guys have alternatives to ritoky/GB, you should present your cases and explain why you want to lynch these people beyond "they're scum". -shrugs- And why they're better lynches than ritoky in particular. I'll drop in to read. If you've seen things I haven't and there's a eureka moment I'm willing to change my vote, but as it stands...no one is bringing forth convincing alternatives at present. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Come on guys. Play smart. GB case is ok, revist tmr. | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
| ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Hint: vigi shot Lone Meow | ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
On December 17 2014 00:21 GlowingBear wrote: Hi. I've solved the night kills. I still have to solve who are the scum players. Hint: vigi shot Lone Meow TMI or lucky guess? | ||
|
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
HAHAHA Simple logic is the answer. Who are you voting? Beware: I'm completely flipping my reads. | ||
| ||
|
|
HomeStory Cup
Korean StarCraft League
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
WardiTV Invitational
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
