Student Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome)

On November 20 2014 08:40 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote:

it's been too long baby.

On November 25 2014 17:13 rsoultin wrote:
Played with Damdred before on another site. He loves his questions.
Breshke vote comes off trying to pressure SL back into the game (which I believe is what was claimed).

What value does a no-lynch vote hold? Avoiding hitting cop/doc or whatever? I tend to like some form of solid information, since at least three players are blowing smoke and sometimes others are too concerned about meta to be of much use. A lynch can get that solid info.

Scummiest to me right now is Bats and/or Oats, though take that with a grain of salt because I'm not feeling strongly about anyone as scum at the moment. The back and forth over Kush and who is contributing what is very white noise. Lot of blah and little helpful being said. Could just be getting sidetracked, or the argument is possibly staged.

^ My take from reading this thread half-asleep. You guys waste no time; I'll give you that.

On November 25 2014 17:36 rsoultin wrote:
Is it shitty to quote myself?

I don't mind answering real questions, but my reasoning was stated above, and most of your arguments are picking and choosing comments out of context. -shrugs- Be more specific or stop wasting my time with nonsense.

On November 25 2014 21:17 Breshke wrote:
yeah i think what i was trying to say is the same as you kush. What did he egt from that trap/ What was he hoping to get from it?

Kush what's your read on Oats if you have any at this time

On November 26 2014 01:42 batsnacks wrote:
Penny for your thoughts kush

On November 25 2014 11:05 Oatsmaster wrote:

I mean, this says NOTHING.
NOTHING.

On November 25 2014 07:31 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote:

usually at least where i'm from this is just a joke vote though i can't speak for this

On November 25 2014 09:33 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote:
sicklucker: why are all your posts about your actions revolving around your town meta? it's easy for mafia to act like their town persona and FOS people who aren't mafia.

On November 25 2014 09:34 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote:
and damdred dont you think you might just be finding reasons to find sick funny at this point?

On November 26 2014 09:05 sicklucker wrote:


Why? We have like the same two scum reads... I think your jumping the gun on dick is all. Hes more null to me I just liked the little ive seen

On November 26 2014 10:13 sicklucker wrote:


Well Ill take my town read away I thought he was a new player but I did like him calling out damdred.

On November 26 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:
I had an early townread on dicksmash because of this post:

He was the first to point this out and several other people sheeped it.

On November 26 2014 10:39 Oatsmaster wrote:

Bad townread.
Anyone could post that.

And again, you reference "Other people" when trying to back up your point. If other people think its good, it doesnt mean its good.

On November 27 2014 02:03 Half the Sky wrote:
DSMI voters - I understand the policy vote arguments, and for the most part, I'm okay with that, because he and Alakaslam had about the same post count with minimal substance going into last night. I can accept that argument. The Day 1 argument, okay, I can also give someone that too...however...

I'm looking at his post-page 18 activity and he has been putting out some substance though it could be supported better. He did have a bandwagon bats vote...

...but if you are looking to policy vote ANYONE at this point, you guys should be going after Alakaslam, not DSMI. After page 18, DSMI isn't a policy vote in my book.



Fair point, but can you (or anyone) distinguish between him and Alakaslam?

On November 26 2014 12:48 Dicksmash McIroncock wrote:
My mistake. It was page 10 when you first called HTS town but a couple posts later put him up as your scumread. SL wrant from null to scum as well. Though reading through bats filter I can see that of everyone he's made and effort to not post reads or reasoning for votes so for today my vote stand on him
## vote bats

On November 28 2014 10:35 sicklucker wrote:
Kush is a possible partner. Kush loves randomly busing his team mates from what ive seen.

On November 28 2014 07:11 Half the Sky wrote:
Did we seriously just lose both power roles in the first 36h?

(INSERT EXPLETIVES HERE.)

Looks like the scum are running scared, and there's a reason for that. I just cannot believe how unlucky we have been though. Unbelievable. More filter diving to come...

On November 29 2014 03:10 Half the Sky wrote:
EBWOP - Rewording my last sentence for clarity.

Rsoultin, what I am questioning is Kush's justification for calling DSMI a policy lynch AND a scum lynch, when DSMI had posted more recently (to Kush's voting him). He used "doubles" as the explanation. Am I making sense now?

On November 30 2014 02:22 Half the Sky wrote:
Kush, two questions.

1 Why are you scumlisting Breshke? He claimed he was hit with RB. Are you counterclaiming? Has anyone?
2 Why are you scumlisting someone who has just entered the game? (Hopeless)

Alakaslam in my eyes was a pure policy lynch. And you said it yourself to me when you brought up DSMI. What prompted the change?

On November 29 2014 06:47 Hopeless1der wrote:
sry gotta go. will finish reading today, 5-8 hours max and then I'll be able to do stuff.

On November 30 2014 02:38 Damdred wrote:
What did you see that was so towny kush

Damdred drew scumlike behaviour well before the lynch, which I'd already addressed and then fell off before the bandwagon vote came rolling. I'm going to take a closer look at his filter regarding the points Trfel brought up. It just seems weird how he dropped off (timewise) and then voted DSMI before his explanation. Even with Kush providing the initial explanation, regardless of where Kush stands himself, it just struck me as opportunistic.