|
On November 30 2014 06:16 Hopeless1der wrote: hmm...last end of day was pretty sparse on active players. This may not work.
Give it 30 minutes at least then we can pull out.
|
On November 30 2014 06:18 Damdred wrote: Kush still might die anyway from modkill theres that to lol
There's plenty of replacements. Coaches can always step in.
|
ebwop actually wait that makes no sense, coaches can't stop in. lol
|
On November 30 2014 06:21 rsoultin wrote:Lol, thank you for telling me my own intentions. I'm certain that you're the expert and all. Before I posted that list. Note the bolded portion or ignore it, if you prefer. Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 17:56 rsoultin wrote: Sure, I can. The reason I started asking Bats and Damdred all those questions today (which apparently isn't proactive, but whatevs) was I found it very strange, Damdred's hyper-focus on HTS at the beginning of the game. SL repeatedly said that HTS questioning Breshke's intentions for voting him and apparently trying to determine alignment only gave him a slight scum read. Damdred kept battering at it, getting way more aggressive than necessary, then stated very clearly (and I quoted this earlier) that he had a scum read on HTS. Yet he claimed today that this wasn't the case and he was only trying to get SL to rethink things. I called him on it, he says he's got a reason (buried somewhere and not related, apparently, to the first part of the thread which is when he first mentioned the scum read) but would "dive" later to find those things.
Has yet to do so.
Bats I actually said was reading neutral for me at the moment. The policy-lynch on kush was eh, whatevs, can see why he might and it mirrors what Breshke did, but he seemed to jump on the HTS scum wagon, too. He says now that wasn't the case, and his posts half-support that because earlier he did clarify to say that he could see why someone might read HTS as scum, not indicating whether he actually did or not. Don't like the contradiction on voting kush though. He said he changed his vote after kush posted, but in reality he changed it to you before kush appeared in the thread.
I still find Damdred more scummy. That's why I've continuously mentioned it being weird to vote bats to determine if Damdred is mafia. One, I really doubt that they both are, because man they've backed themselves into a corner if they are and I like to think people are smarter than that.
As far as kush is concerned, I don't see him contributing that much. He asks a lot of other people for reads, true...majority of his posts were helping to push dicksmash, though. The main thing for me, however, is I actually have to go through his filter to remember a single thing he's really said. Which means nothing he's done was significant enough to get my attention, while I can remember details about most of the rest of you just fine.
Meatpudding...was just so off the wall. Beginning of game jokes, has to be prompted to contribute, the random digression on lynch policies mid-read on HTS, his general AFK stuff. Still say the guy's lurking. I was clear about the 24 hours in question being between when he asked someone for reads and when he posted his Marry/Bang/Kill list, and he says he posted a half hour before. Which he clearly hadn't. I'm looking directly at the filter. The list itself was just names, had to be prompted for explanations. The storm is legit enough, sure, but why was he AFK that long before? A different timezone does not equate to a 24 hr absence, and he dodged the question. Between him and slam, I've more reason to vote him because there's something off there.
You, Oats...to be honest I'm not reading you as scum but at the same time I wouldn't at all be surprised if you did flip scum. You really do have this nasty habit of focusing in on only the details you want to see. You've jumped on half my posts before, asking questions where the answer was in the word right next to it...
And maybe your definition of proactive is different than mine, but I think trying to narrow down scum by looking for town reads isn't useless.
And you conveniently left out the context for the list... Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 14:42 rsoultin wrote: Kush says d1 is enough to "prove" him town. Which...not really sure the thought process behind anyone claiming that because I view everything as fluid.
Nevertheless, a pop through his filter reveals: - first post nothing but a vote on bats. but bats had policy voted him, so -shrugs- - asks me why I said bats and oats were "scummiest", claiming I provided no reasoning when it was right in the post - tells breshke sl is scummy for "omgus"ing breshke - changes vote to damdred for tone and bad defense of "shit pushes", only giving reasoning 30 minutes later, after he's prompted - gets into argument with oats in bat's defense for the HTS read (argument lasts 1 post) - jumps on dicksmash train led by damdred (what was that before about shit pushes?) presenting evidence of "nitpicking" and "white knighting", votes dicks - calls sl bad at the game for not providing reasons for his reads (nother pot calls kettle moment given his earlier vote on damdred) - says again in all caps that dicks should be lynched day 1, two separate times in all caps, followed by a list of scum 5 ppl long (including Damdred in 3 spot, so again, why jumping on that train?) and defends bats some more, also citing one of the reasons to push dicks is because of his scum read on bats - says lets lynch bats (sarcasm, maybe?) then turns right around and says he's not bussing, he's only defended bats after dicks flips town - repeated comments he won't be able to do anything today and so scum wins (with this much time left before EoD?)
less concerned about him obviously closing ranks with bats, and more about the train on dicks with "scum" damdred and his "shit pushes". why vote for what you think is a scum-led push?
that and that there was all the meat (I encourage you to filter dive yourself) he had in 3 pages worth of posts...not a lot of anything but pushing dicks and backing bats Now, y'all can waste a lynch on me if that's what you want, but don't tell me what my intentions were while editing parts of my posts out xP I will call you on that.
So is that post about why kush is scum or not because you've contradicted yourself 3 times in the last 3 posts?
|
On November 30 2014 06:38 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2014 06:27 batsnacks wrote:On November 30 2014 06:21 rsoultin wrote:Lol, thank you for telling me my own intentions. I'm certain that you're the expert and all. Before I posted that list. Note the bolded portion or ignore it, if you prefer. On November 28 2014 17:56 rsoultin wrote: Sure, I can. The reason I started asking Bats and Damdred all those questions today (which apparently isn't proactive, but whatevs) was I found it very strange, Damdred's hyper-focus on HTS at the beginning of the game. SL repeatedly said that HTS questioning Breshke's intentions for voting him and apparently trying to determine alignment only gave him a slight scum read. Damdred kept battering at it, getting way more aggressive than necessary, then stated very clearly (and I quoted this earlier) that he had a scum read on HTS. Yet he claimed today that this wasn't the case and he was only trying to get SL to rethink things. I called him on it, he says he's got a reason (buried somewhere and not related, apparently, to the first part of the thread which is when he first mentioned the scum read) but would "dive" later to find those things.
Has yet to do so.
Bats I actually said was reading neutral for me at the moment. The policy-lynch on kush was eh, whatevs, can see why he might and it mirrors what Breshke did, but he seemed to jump on the HTS scum wagon, too. He says now that wasn't the case, and his posts half-support that because earlier he did clarify to say that he could see why someone might read HTS as scum, not indicating whether he actually did or not. Don't like the contradiction on voting kush though. He said he changed his vote after kush posted, but in reality he changed it to you before kush appeared in the thread.
I still find Damdred more scummy. That's why I've continuously mentioned it being weird to vote bats to determine if Damdred is mafia. One, I really doubt that they both are, because man they've backed themselves into a corner if they are and I like to think people are smarter than that.
As far as kush is concerned, I don't see him contributing that much. He asks a lot of other people for reads, true...majority of his posts were helping to push dicksmash, though. The main thing for me, however, is I actually have to go through his filter to remember a single thing he's really said. Which means nothing he's done was significant enough to get my attention, while I can remember details about most of the rest of you just fine.
Meatpudding...was just so off the wall. Beginning of game jokes, has to be prompted to contribute, the random digression on lynch policies mid-read on HTS, his general AFK stuff. Still say the guy's lurking. I was clear about the 24 hours in question being between when he asked someone for reads and when he posted his Marry/Bang/Kill list, and he says he posted a half hour before. Which he clearly hadn't. I'm looking directly at the filter. The list itself was just names, had to be prompted for explanations. The storm is legit enough, sure, but why was he AFK that long before? A different timezone does not equate to a 24 hr absence, and he dodged the question. Between him and slam, I've more reason to vote him because there's something off there.
You, Oats...to be honest I'm not reading you as scum but at the same time I wouldn't at all be surprised if you did flip scum. You really do have this nasty habit of focusing in on only the details you want to see. You've jumped on half my posts before, asking questions where the answer was in the word right next to it...
And maybe your definition of proactive is different than mine, but I think trying to narrow down scum by looking for town reads isn't useless.
And you conveniently left out the context for the list... On November 29 2014 14:42 rsoultin wrote: Kush says d1 is enough to "prove" him town. Which...not really sure the thought process behind anyone claiming that because I view everything as fluid.
Nevertheless, a pop through his filter reveals: - first post nothing but a vote on bats. but bats had policy voted him, so -shrugs- - asks me why I said bats and oats were "scummiest", claiming I provided no reasoning when it was right in the post - tells breshke sl is scummy for "omgus"ing breshke - changes vote to damdred for tone and bad defense of "shit pushes", only giving reasoning 30 minutes later, after he's prompted - gets into argument with oats in bat's defense for the HTS read (argument lasts 1 post) - jumps on dicksmash train led by damdred (what was that before about shit pushes?) presenting evidence of "nitpicking" and "white knighting", votes dicks - calls sl bad at the game for not providing reasons for his reads (nother pot calls kettle moment given his earlier vote on damdred) - says again in all caps that dicks should be lynched day 1, two separate times in all caps, followed by a list of scum 5 ppl long (including Damdred in 3 spot, so again, why jumping on that train?) and defends bats some more, also citing one of the reasons to push dicks is because of his scum read on bats - says lets lynch bats (sarcasm, maybe?) then turns right around and says he's not bussing, he's only defended bats after dicks flips town - repeated comments he won't be able to do anything today and so scum wins (with this much time left before EoD?)
less concerned about him obviously closing ranks with bats, and more about the train on dicks with "scum" damdred and his "shit pushes". why vote for what you think is a scum-led push?
that and that there was all the meat (I encourage you to filter dive yourself) he had in 3 pages worth of posts...not a lot of anything but pushing dicks and backing bats Now, y'all can waste a lynch on me if that's what you want, but don't tell me what my intentions were while editing parts of my posts out xP I will call you on that. So is that post about why kush is scum or not because you've contradicted yourself 3 times in the last 3 posts? Bats, gonna dropkick you again. The post that you edited parts out of is about kush being scum. The list that you chose to quote without the rest of the post was what content I could glean out of the 3 pages of posts in his filter at the time of the post.
On November 30 2014 06:02 rsoultin wrote: For clarification, bats, that actually wasn't a list of scummy behavior. That was me going back through his filter to find what little content was in it. My main issue with kush is that he has so little content, and he was claiming he wouldn't be playing for the rest of the day.
|
|
Everyone on rsoultin should get ready to switch to HTS.
|
If there is a tie for most votes, whoever most recently had more votes than the other is the person who is up for the lynch.
Nvm we're okay.
|
On November 30 2014 06:51 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:If there is a tie for most votes, whoever most recently had more votes than the other is the person who is up for the lynch. Nvm we're okay. I feel like that is wrong...
I did too but that's what it says.
|
On November 30 2014 06:52 Hopeless1der wrote: pretty sure kush is lynched at this point unless we all do in fact switch to someone but I dont want to lynch HTS if I can avoid it.
It's 4-4 and rsoultin was more recent.
|
On November 30 2014 06:55 Hopeless1der wrote: most recently had more votes
the more votes clause puts the lynch on kush.
I think we're right, we need to switch. Switch?
|
##unvote ##vote: Half the Sky
GOGOGOGO
|
|
|
|
On November 30 2014 08:10 Half the Sky wrote: Why would Kush get modelled? He's been active.
He didn't vote.
|
On November 30 2014 08:10 Half the Sky wrote: Why would Kush get modelled? He's been active.
Why wouldn't you vote rsoultin to save yourself? Are you more confident in rsoultin's alignment then you are your own?
Doesn't make sense.
|
On November 30 2014 08:30 sicklucker wrote: So lets just talk were wasting alot of time. This is usually when I can participate the most its a weekend. I wanna hear from the guys who made a horrible lynch and why.
You'll regret posting that if someone flips town
|
I'm tired of townreading SL for his ideas being too wrong to be scummy.
|
On November 30 2014 09:20 Damdred wrote: Bats out of the vets who would be the scum i'd hate to think all the newer players go scum
Oats
|
|
|
|