VI Titanic Mini Mafia: The Return of MSPaint - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wwhy the fuck would being absolute be scummy? i must be mafia in every game then.... are you dense or some shit? read the thread | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:30 VisceraEyes wrote: My point is that you know it's not scummy for me to do it, but you're telling town that it is. You're misleading town, in a destructive way. It's still scummy. There's nothing that you can tell me that will change my mind. I look at what you are doing and think oh hey that's terrible play and isn't doing anything but making the thread worse (in regards to me) and therefore think it is scummy. Your stuff on hopeless may be some tactic of appearing more sure than you are for pressure fine but it's misplaced in things that aren't scummy and you were actively trying to PILE things onto him which don't make any sense whatsoever (the qt thing etc) so I called you out on it. So really, all you're saying is that you lied about how sure of a read you are (in a towny way to you but a scummy way to the thread because it was a lie) and got called out on your inconsistency so I'm mafia. OK. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:36 The_Templar wrote: HF, do you think I am scummy? why does it matter? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You're also calling out VE for fabricating things but rayn is defending VE's mindset so that read is not congruent with what you've been saying. You also seem extremely flippant in regards to the VE/hopeless interaction earlier. You're just not ritokyish. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() also ![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
really really really bad | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:55 ritoky wrote: you've only insulted 1 person so far, that's muted for you. the day is young | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:00 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't exaggerate my read Holyflare, I still think he's mafia for it. I was just exaggerating how certain I am of it - I'm NOT certain of it, it's just my read. And further, I'm not saying you're mafia FOR defending Hopeless. My reasoning is clear and explicit. I'm saying your mafia for defending Hopeless FOR BAD REASON (saying that something that IS objectively scummy is NOT objectively scummy) AT A WEIRD TIME (right after you acquired a scumread of him yourself, in response to MY pressure of him) WHILE SCUMREADING HIM! Holyflare Jesus Christ, I never have to spell shit out for you multiple times like this. Maybe you are town. :/ Feigning contribution is scummy yes, but nowhere did he do that at the time you had said he had done that. The start of the game does not count towards feigning contribution when all he's done is comment on a snowflake in the first hour of the game. That doesn't make anyone mafia ever and was a bs EXAGGERATED read that I do not and will not ever agree on. People have done the exact same thing as town in many many many many many more games so it's not OBJECTIVELY scummy at all, it's entirely subjective because it's what you think which goes against the actual facts. There's quite a difference between scum reading someone for what you said and scum reading him for something entirely different. He might not end up being scum and then I can look back and remember that your pressure was far more exacerbated than it should have been in that situation. Telling you that your initial logic for scum reading him was bad has nothing to do with him looking scummy for his reaction. It's an observation. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:07 liancourt wrote: LOL what is there to read stop trying to over analyze everything LOL analyze me LOL You know it's possible to catch mafia day 1 because of analysing, you've been in several games where mafia has been lynched day 1 because of actual analysis. So why are you telling people to stop analysing when it only helps to find mafia? You are being very very strange. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:51 ritoky wrote: I am meish because I am me. rayn said you're weird. it's true, you're weird. why? cuz you're not angry at all. a couple posts ago you seemed slightly agitated. but the super town HF calls people bad and idiots and tells everyone to sheep him and claims god tier. you're muted, so you're weird. but that said, rayn's subsequent post responding to my criticism and detailing who is town is the stuff i can put in my coffee in the morning. as for me being me, i find like find odd and disjointed interactions day 1 and finding scum that way, you saw me behind the scenes last game. hence why i don't like hopeless. that read should not surprise you in the slightest. rayn said I was weird after 1 post so this doesn't make sense in the slightest On November 20 2014 18:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: VE is town. Slam is town. We can kill Templar because of that mafia post. ritoky i am the king of vague statements. this was also his only response to your criticism and details absolutely nothing so it's weird that the person who has said almost nothing whatsoever is your town read, especially when you pick and choose some of his posts to fit into a later timeline | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:17 VisceraEyes wrote: Well bolded is just your opinion just like my opinion is that Hopeless' early posting is scummy. I don't think the read is exaggerated at all, I think the posts I pointed out CLEARLY illustrate Hopeless trying to blend in. But I guess you're right, that's my opinion. But the italicized is obviously an exaggeration because no one has ever made the post Hopeless made in response to Chez because Hopeless has never made that post in any other game in response to Chez. People have done SIMILAR things, but no one has done "the exact same" thing ever. See how easy that is to just switch on? Like, it doesn't matter if you're exaggerating or not, you're just making a point right? My logic wasn't bad - you disagree with the severity of the infringement in the posts I pointed out, but the logic is fucking sound Holyflare. That's why I say you're repeatedly trying to discredit me...because you're saying things that are blatantly untrue in an attempt to make me look bad - WHILE I find someone who YOU find suspicious...suspicious. Why? Why are you doing that? he's made posts like that in games before!? I don't know what you're even arguing about anymore because it's seemingly just crazy semantics where you want to prove that your opinion is the best opinion he's made posts like that before as town other townies have made posts like that before as town you say only scum make posts like that to blend in he reacts poorly you start to pile things onto him which also don't make him scummy i say your first part is wrong and your qt crap is wrong and it's scummy that you're so absolute about this read but his reaction is pretty scummy all I've done is negate the extreme pressure you are putting on him and your misleading of the thread by correcting you and showing the thread the only points that could possibly make him mafia My logic wasn't bad - you disagree with the severity of the infringement in the posts I pointed out, but the logic is fucking sound Holyflare. I disagree with the whole premise. The logic is not sound as I have explained that townies and hopeless as a towny have made posts like that before. It's silly that you try and turn it into the EXACT wording he uses and says it makes him different when it doesn't at all. | ||
| ||