Campus Mafia (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 2

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 00:57 GMT

#197

On November 03 2014 09:56 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:

I don't see how asking two questions is indicative of a lot at this point.

Out of the four on your "serious and not making sense" pile, how many of those names would you be willing to call scum right now?

Just you actually.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 00:59 GMT

#200

On November 03 2014 09:57 KelsierSC wrote:
Yeh i disagree he is " clearly top town " you said he is making sense when all he has "seriously" done is ask me a stupid question.
just makes you look bad

Why don't you tell me why it makes me look bad and I might change my assessment. As is you're just discrediting me on zero basis.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:01 GMT

#202

On November 03 2014 09:58 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:

Show nested quote +

Because I wasn't aware of BH being "king of RNG"?

No this is why:

On October 25 2014 05:52 Blazinghand wrote:
Game setup information:

This is a mafia game for 13 players. 3 players will be randomly selected as mafia.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:14 GMT

#209

On November 03 2014 10:03 KelsierSC wrote:

Show nested quote +

you called breshke the top town for making the most sense and being serious.
neither of those reasons are true.
if i don't believe your read you look bad to me

You've added nothing so I have nothing new to say.

On November 03 2014 10:04 Fecalfeast wrote:
Batsnacks your tone seems really aggressive to me, is this intended? I'd like you to elaborate on what "serious but doesn't make sense" means, if you will. Especially if kush is lesser and sentinel was an afterthought to that list, I fail to see what is so hard to understand about anyone's posts.

Serious but doesn't make sense means serious but doesn't make sense. For example this:

On November 03 2014 07:42 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:

Show nested quote +

We have seven new players and six not new players, right?

So my prediction is that this game is slightly balanced because three new scum would be easy to point out without some good coaching, and three vet scum would make the game too hard without, again, coaching.

So one new scum, one vet scum, and another vet scum to tip the scales slightly scumward because this setup favors town. It takes four mislynches for scum to win but only three successful lynches for town to win.

This has a serious tone, but doesn't make logical sense because all setups are randomly generated. Sentinel has played mafia on this site before, so it doesn't make sense that he believes what he wrote. If I hope you understand now.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:24 GMT

#216

So you want to clear FF because you think he actually read the thread. As opposed to kush who claimed he read the thread and then made false conclusions from what he read?

Does that mean you think kush is mafia or do you just think FF is town because he can read?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:35 GMT

#223

On November 03 2014 10:28 KelsierSC wrote:

Show nested quote +

hmm i just explained all of this.

ff had to actually go back to the op and do some thinking about set ups and then come back and ask Kush. He also made a good post to sentinel about rng. Furthermore since the read his question to you about sentinal being an afterthought about not making sense...even though he is your main example of not making sense is an excellent one.

i dont think kusha play was alignment indicative as i said earlier

I think FF explaining the obvious is in a serious tone is weird, maybe scummy, but my vote is happily occupied with Superbia for the time being. Time will tell. All of us (should have) read the OP, reading the OP/checking the OP are not alignment indicative.

I think kush's "I solved the game post" was weird, but not alignment indicative. Just weird.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:43 GMT

#225

I'd really dig it if someone (Chelsea) voted with me.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 01:49 GMT

#227

It's not a trap, I'm voting Superbia because I think he is the scummiest player and deserves to be voted.

(So do you)

On November 03 2014 10:40 KelsierSC wrote:
Yeh that's a good place to vote imo

Even if it is a trap people who fall for bat traps are usually town.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 02:05 GMT

#239

I got your back Chelsea. If you don't state 4 reasons why Superbia is mafia I certainly will.

I'm even going to insist that you make one of the reasons this:

On November 03 2014 07:27 Superbia wrote:

Show nested quote +

Congratulations on signing the contract! We will begin the tunneling process during business hours (i.e. Monday), as the company is officially closed during Sunday. Good night!

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 02:50 GMT

#276

Sentinel

Superbia

Cricketer12

Idra

BATS

Chelsea

Feces

Breshke

kush

LightningStrike

Elvis!

Serejai

Immaterial

you're welcome

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 03:00 GMT

#278

Important Posts:
Day 1
+ Show Spoiler +

On November 03 2014 07:01 Blazinghand wrote:

Campus Mafia

Day 1

This day ends in 48 hours at 22:00 GMT (+00:00). Whoever has the most votes on them at that time gets lynched.

Countdown:

If you didn't get a role PM, contact me.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 13:41 GMT

#318

I'm sort of here. Which one of superbia's posts made you change your mind about him, lightning?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 13:59 GMT

#321

On November 03 2014 22:45 LightningStrike wrote:

Show nested quote +

I can't unvote as far as I know now that I read the thing but after reading his posts a little bit more carefully he just seem like a troll.

So you thought he was fishy, and now you think he's trolly. What made you change your mind? Superbia hasn't said anything.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 14:23 GMT

#323

People have mentioned that superbia was trolly the last time he was mafia. In the games I've played with superbia where he was town he wasn't trolly and didn't tunnel anyone early.

Who should the people who are voting superbia be focusing on if not him?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 20:54 GMT

#353

As a side note... You really shouldn't rig your games. That's bad and stuff.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 22:38 GMT

#365

I like that vote. Elvis! has joined my d1 towncircle.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 22:47 GMT

#369

@chelsea & elvis He's seems the least comfortable in the thread so far. Maybe he'll settle in later but until then I agree with what elvis said and think the vote is warranted.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 22:50 GMT

#370

ebwop actually, I think this guy seems the least comfortable:

On November 03 2014 07:46 Cricketer12 wrote:
I'm so confused T_T

That's his whole filter.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 23:12 GMT

#378

Can I answer? Kush is null. I think this is a good thing to do though:

On November 03 2014 22:12 kushm4sta wrote:

Show nested quote +

yeah.. no.
reads or you get lynched.
##vote serejai

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

November 03 2014 23:15 GMT

#380

On November 04 2014 08:14 Grackaroni wrote:
Yeah I'm good with policy lynching Kush if he doesn't do anything worthwhile today. He seemed pretty hyped to play pre-game too.

If kush and Jasmine both do nothing today, which would you rather policy lynch?

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Campus Mafia (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 2

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming