|
On November 01 2014 12:28 Circumstance wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 11:31 jaybrundage wrote:
Circumstance giving that your reason for holding on to your reads isn't necessary there can not be a No-Lynch. I would like you to put who you suspect on the table. Echoing GB Even if your reads are half baked it helps to see your thought process and how you arrived there. I do have some questions for you as well.
You bring up risk.nuke what's your reasoning for wanting to lynch him?
How do you feel about Oats? Do you still think hes worth analyzing? What's your read on him?
LT has quite a bit of votes on him but you haven't mentioned him as a candidate. Why is that?
Who is your ideal lynch candidate?
I'll go over the questions first, since I need to do a proper filter runthrough before I go on with reads. I've been going mainly on instinct since I went to bed last night. I brought up risk.nuke because I noticed a push towards him, and given that I was assuming a majority requirement, I figured it would be pertinent to nail someone down quickly. Oats still feels like he's not really helping move things along. Holyflare's assessment of him mimics my thoughts to a certain extent. I think he's definitely worth an analysis, because he just doesn't seem to make sense right now. LT seemed like a placeholder more than anything - the rationale of voting seemed to be mainly "eh, no big loss if we're wrong." And I did see a few posts indicating that people were planning on unvoting him (though that evidently didn't wind up happening in the thread itself). If it were up to me, I had the power to off one player straight away, I wouldn't be prepared to do so just yet. I'm not seeing something I can put together and say "Yes, this player is definitely ideal to lynch today", so with the time we have, I'd like for us all to get a stronger case put together on someone.
So the biggest thing I think I got from your post is that your unsure about anyone's alignment as of yet. Disappointing but as we are in the first day not very surprising either.
However as noted by the Bold it seems that your very willing to sheep the thread. Do you plan to just go with the majority?Do you have a player that you strongly consider town and would be willing to follow?
Also I would be fine lynching LT. While he is not reeking of mafia. His continuous lack of contributions are becoming more and more telling. He also seems to not be bothered with the vote majority on him atm and shows no signs of improving.
|
On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke
You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste.
On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow.
|
Obi I thought you were gonna come back and talk about stuff. Shoot. Who's your scum read?
@ Liancourt. I noticed that you seem to comment on a lot of things and often ask questions. Liking it so far. I am not sure who your top scum read is tho. Do you have anyone picked out?
I would ideally like to get each person to set up a position on who they would like to lynch. The day is half over, What would suck is if at the end of the day we have people with poorly defined positions who just can pile on any bandwagon with little reasoning and because of that let scum influence the lynch.
I'm not posting this just to try to give scum a hard time. Townies do this shit too and it makes it harder to sift thru the drivel after a lynch.
|
And for clarification purposes after my @Liancourt paragraph I was talking to the whole thread.
|
On November 01 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 13:29 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste. On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow. Why do you trust and believe the cat before it has even done anything? Cuz no one has ever lied in a mafia game right? And how is it a waste? How do you know the cat doesn't have more information? If you use it on a lurker with nearly no content and the cat comes back with something more; it potentially has more info, if it says idk, then it is basically useless since it just distributes an opinion from a source who's motive we don't know. I don't see how that is a useless proposition in the slightest. The fact that you have 0 skepticism over this shit doesn't reflect a townie mindset.
Rofl How about you go read what my opinion about the cat is.
Also Liancourt made his decision to pick a lurker from what i saw as a false assumption that the cat had knowledge independent of the thread based on him not reading well or misinterpreting what the cat said. So I pointed out his mistake.
Again read what my actually opinion is about the cat your whole tirade is irrelevant.
|
On November 01 2014 14:44 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:36 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:On November 01 2014 13:29 jaybrundage wrote:On November 01 2014 12:29 liancourt wrote:On November 01 2014 08:29 ritoky wrote:
VE, I think your original post accusing risk was not as directed as what you just recently said as what you are letting on. I think the emphasis was less so on how mafia find it easy to talk about 3rd party and such, and moreso directed toward him fucking off after that's the only thing he has done. I don't disagree with you, I just think that you and GB are probably two town fighting.
JayB, that case on HF is bad.....as was your list of quote case earlier....
Also, we should probably get some consensus on the analysis soon.
I was thinking about it a bit: 1) the cat sounds like foolishness.
2) still don't know if the cat does what it says
3) does the cat just make a case on someone based on the content in the thread or does it get additional information?
I think in 1 of our 2 cycles we might want to potentially use it on a complete lurker to see if the cat get's additional information outside of posts. Because if it doesn't....it doesn't exactly seem extremely useful outside of just being another person with an unknown objective. i agree to test this cat we should use it on a lurker to see if it gives additional info. I think atm risk.nuke is the primary lurker so ##Analyze risk.nuke You must of missed this. Using this on a lurker (if you do plan to use it) would be a waste. On November 01 2014 00:02 Mr. Bigglesworth wrote:
To clarify things:
I am a player from outside the game. I was summoned by a townie who I must keep in secret.
I'll analyse a player as any player would. This means I will read the thread, focus on that player's posts, and say what I think about him, i.e., make a case.
Talking about me will lead nowhere. I am town aligned but I'm not a killable player. Which means you will gain nothing trying to know who I am or if I am town, mafia or 3rd party, for I'm none.
This is my last post until the first analysis. Meow. Why do you trust and believe the cat before it has even done anything? Cuz no one has ever lied in a mafia game right? And how is it a waste? How do you know the cat doesn't have more information? If you use it on a lurker with nearly no content and the cat comes back with something more; it potentially has more info, if it says idk, then it is basically useless since it just distributes an opinion from a source who's motive we don't know. I don't see how that is a useless proposition in the slightest. The fact that you have 0 skepticism over this shit doesn't reflect a townie mindset. Rofl How about you go read what my opinion about the cat is. Also Liancourt made his decision to pick a lurker from what i saw as a false assumption that the cat had knowledge independent of the thread based on him not reading well or misinterpreting what the cat said. So I pointed out his mistake. Again read what my actually opinion is about the cat your whole tirade is irrelevant. i don't think your previously stated opinion matters in this case. you just quoted the cat and bolded it like it was fact to refute someone's reasoning. which to me, says you believe it. and if your previous opinion was any different, that just makes it worse. but i mean, we will see this cat analysis since apparently it's going on you w/e the thing posts.
If your too lazy to filter me and find what i said about the cat previously and insist on arguing from ignorance. I won't be responding to anything further on the matter.
|
On November 01 2014 14:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Tempted to roll with this tbh.
Get some dice DO IT FOR RNG.
|
On November 01 2014 14:53 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2014 14:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On November 01 2014 14:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
##vote : Blazinghand Tempted to roll with this tbh. Get some dice DO IT FOR RNG.
Get it! Cause he said roll and i said dice and RNG + Show Spoiler +
|
On November 01 2014 15:01 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Tempted to rescind my townread on jb for his bad jokes.
Is it worth it? Probably.
IT WAS WORTH IT!!!!!11111
|
On November 01 2014 14:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Seriously that rng shit was such bullshit this time. Super cop out, and not at all like what he did before
I'm having faith that Blazing will come back and actually do something.
|
Quoting the LT post with "content"
+ Show Spoiler +On November 01 2014 16:54 Lord Tolkien wrote:
alright, back from long series of cancer inhouses
wheeeeeeee~
I'm tired and actually want to sleep, but I SUPPOSE I should help lead town to victory.
...when I'm not about to pass out.
First,
I really want to analyze JB. But whatever town wants, I guess. I'll consolidate because I'm a conformist and not mafia trying to waste muh votes.
Two,
Misder, I find it very enlightening to see how people reacted to my blatant trolling. Very enlightening indeed. It's how I garner early reads: looking at the wagons that always form on me D1. :D
Plus no one ever lynches me D1, so why should I be concerned.
Three,
Holyflare, VE, and GlowingBear are probably town. Compare the cancer mafia Glowing to current Glowing. Much more wililng to take a stance and much less passive. Will peg him as town for now. Would also sort of like to say OWS is slightly leaning town, but much less to go on.
I've heard people say that Oats is hard to read, but idk, he's leaning town in my reading.
Everyone else are scummerdawgs, or I can't read them based on past experience. Id actually have to, like, put in effort and nitpick their filters.
Four,
as much lulz and hilarity BHs RNG lynch turned out in FFL mini-mafia, I'm not quite ready to take one on yet. At least, not when I've good a semi-decent read on Glowing. Won't vote for what I suspect is a sure mislynch.
Also again, lynching (one of?) the most active player is lelelelel
Five,
Zzzzz, Giving risk.nuke some time to do his IRL shit. But if he dont post D2, we post lynch him then. If we lurker lynch someone, we should totes lynch Monte Seuss lel.
jrkirby: who are you mafia reads? You made it clear that I'm only your vote because you want me to post stuff and not troll.
I'll post moar, but can't promise not trolling on occasion. But in any event, you've given no real stance on possible mafia, instead sheeping onto a silly RNG vote.
I'll be awake sometime before ~12PM EDT to carry town to victoryyyyyyy.
For now,
#Vote Seuss
But i'll consolidate when the time cums
First
Everyone and their mum wants to analyze me nothing new here.
Second
You say its "Very enlightening indeed." How people react to your trolling. Classic cop out. And seeing as I have been reacting strongly against your "trolling" I would think you would have something insightful to comment about me.
You put a throw away vote on Seuss. Directly under that you state your intention to sheep towards the end of the day. Going further then that you recant your vote on Seuss after you see him post.
After 20 or so shit posts I'm not impressed.
Your only redeeming factor is that BH has done less then you. Which is rather damning for BH. And who I am rather disappointed in.
|
@Damdred I don't see where anyone specifically asked you for your read on me. Can you post it I couldn't find it. Your biggest post is a post about me being town. But I know I'm town that doesn't help me. Also you seem to be saying you find GB scummy. But then you also state you don't wanna vote him cause he has the biggest filter. Considering how early we are in the game I can understand your sentiment. But the problem is that you don't present a case for someone that we can lynch TODAY!
@BG You wanna switch to Damdred as i can see. What opinion do you currently have on BH as he was your last top scum read.
|
On November 02 2014 02:07 GlowingBear wrote:
LYNCH
ALL
LIARS.
IF YOU DON'T GET DAMDRED LYNCHED I'LL PUNCH A WALL... WITH MY HEAD.
Video or it didn't happen
|
On November 02 2014 02:14 GlowingBear wrote:
You guys,
Place your votes on Damdred
Don't force me into making a huge case on him. We already have enough motives to lynch him.
I could never not accept a case freely offered. GB you gonna deliver?
|
On November 02 2014 02:24 GlowingBear wrote:
I'm gonna take a nap. When I wake up I want to see votes placed on damdy.
GB NOT GONNA DELIVER
|
On November 02 2014 02:21 Damdred wrote:
I'll take bad town, not any different from most of the thread.
And look at jrkirby he once again changed vote when it wasn't going in the way that he wanted
Don't worry about replying to the thread atm. Put that time into writing a case on a scum read you wanna lynch today. We know you think GB might be scum and worth lynching later on but we got to lynch someone in less then 10 hours. GIT HER DONE
|
On November 02 2014 02:26 Holyflare wrote:
1) ObiWanShinobi <--- random town reads based off of almost nothing and talking about useless crap, talks about how much of a waste analysing jb is and then does it
5) risk.nuke - 0 posts 0 posts of content but is a "good player?" his quote btw
11) Alakaslam - never have any clue really
12) Blazinghand - probably scummiest mofo, excuse for being afk for a ridiculous amount of time (dinner????????) and then rng to fill in the gaps of "content", then NOT pushing his rng target like a mofo and no fake rng case content after that
13) Damdred - massive long post on why jay is town and then asked to post reads and didn't post anything else despite saying he had more notes, pretty scummy especially when jay is super borderline not town that i wanted to put him on this list
potential people to add:
seuss
jay
tolkien
Stop the shitty list post. I WANNA A CASE DAMMIT. Preferably one that you don't directly misrepresent things.
|
On November 02 2014 04:09 GlowingBear wrote:
I'm not talking anymore. If you guys don't lynch damdred I won't play this game anymore, so you should lynch me.
Bye.
This is the worst post in the thread. Plz grow up.
|
@Dramdred If I read the OP correctly "Each character role will have a predetermined set of spells and abilities that are available for their use. These spells may be revealed at the start of the game or become available at certain points in the game." Everyone will be a blue/have some type of ability. Just cause you used your power and claimed, IT does NOT exempt you from being mafia. So stop mentioning it like it is a good defense.
On November 02 2014 04:10 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2014 04:09 GlowingBear wrote:
I'm not talking anymore. If you guys don't lynch damdred I won't play this game anymore, so you should lynch me.
Bye. what the literal fuck.... i'm claiming a blue power role and this is the response? I post my notes though ve mad about redacting and this is what you do. Good job gb is a good lynch then
@VE: In regards to Dramdred, Bad Town or Scum.
The Town case felt pretty heavy-handed. And I'm pretty sure he cleaned up his notes before posting, not that it actually matters.
The use of the power seems normal. As scum or town he felt the thread sentiment going towards his lynch and felt he more time would be helpful so he could insure he wouldn't get lynched. The claim seems pretty clear cut. No clue what the issue is here.
Also I feel like your hung up on that fact that it changes to a majority lynch. I don't see the big deal. Maybe its cause most of the games I have played have been Majority lynch. But your really over reacting to the switch in voting. Why they hell would the town collectively let a No-Lynch happen? Any town worth its salt wouldn't let that shit happen.
We get more time to discuss which is good for town. Although I was looking forward to lynching someone tonite but we have more time to type and we should try to use wisely. [Aside]: And by wisely I mean discuss and try to figure things out and not get tunnel visioned and refuse to consider alternate possibilities /Aside]
I think Dramdred's case will be an important factor. Looking forward to it.
|
VE respond to my respond of your inquiry
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SZmUSix.gif)
