Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 5

On October 10 2014 07:57 liancourt wrote:


you haven't done anything that's what's scummy and you're just asking questions and thats it for 2 days straight. You want to seem active by asking questions and you want to be reading someone scum so you choose you the one who has been calling you out. I think that's pretty much scummy in my eyes.

On October 10 2014 08:09 liancourt wrote:


he didn't make a case he just copied you and tunneled me.

On October 10 2014 08:15 liancourt wrote:
[insert more complaints]

On October 10 2014 08:18 liancourt wrote:


it's like what you're doing so I don't see why I have to comply with your requests as you didn't do mine either on d1. i thin kyou called me self-centered when I asked so there.

On October 10 2014 08:21 Blazinghand wrote:


oi what's wrong with voting ows

On October 10 2014 08:20 liancourt wrote:
you know what I'll just vote you until you give a read on someone else, but me and actually help town instead of tunneling me.

##Vote StorrZerg

On October 10 2014 08:25 Blazinghand wrote:


arg, but ows has done nothing even remotely useful or town-oriented! all he has done is try to save OO (laughably) and backtrack it, then follow his scumread (who he now claims is a townread) to push h1

how in the name of THE LORD do you have a tonwread on ows????

On October 10 2014 08:30 liancourt wrote:


What is this logic? Do more people have to complain of your lack of reads for you to be scum?

Based on my logic, you know I'm town because you are scum. You pick the scummiest town player on d1, which was undoubtedly me because everyone was giving me shit and you knew you could get easy support if you rolled out a half decent case basically mix and matching what everyone else has said before.

So, I'm just gonna keep on complaining until you give other reads besides me cos I'm so stubborn.

On October 10 2014 08:35 Blazinghand wrote:


You're correct-- I do think a valid mafia strat would be "oppose the lynch at first when it starts to look dangerous, then go along with the wagon if it seems inevitable", and the players who did this should be heavily scrutinized. However, I can't see any motivation for OWS' attempted shenannies. He says it was a joke or whatever, but the timing and the choice and the backpedal (when just reading the shenanny thing it doesn't seem that joking) don't seem particularly joking to me. I want you to bear in mind that a successful shenanningan LOOKS like a joke, because it *IS* a joke. I am the shenannigan king, I know how they work. It's a deconstruction of allt he long wagon-building into one final moment where every statement, every vote counts, and glorious things can happen, and nothing about it seems somber. The mood reflecrts a joking mood, so you can't say "he sounded like he was joking" and make it like it WASN'T a real shennanigan attempt.

The fact of the matter is, OWS made a serious attempt to do a last-minute derail of the lynch. When push came to shove, he tried to save OO, who had no posts except a couple scummy posts and bad scumminess, and who flipped scum. When it comes down to the line, that's when you find out who you are. And that's who OWS is when the veil is pulled back: he is scum.

On October 10 2014 08:36 liancourt wrote:


I'm sorry damd it must be my scum vision on you, but all I'm reading is you trying to wiggle your way out of saying that you copied storr by claiming you didnt read his before you did yours. No one can confirm that story sorry damd but you're becoming scummier by every post you make.

On October 10 2014 08:39 Blazinghand wrote:


because it WAS a serious attempt. I legit haven't read hopeless1's filter, it's possible he's scum too-- I was voting him previously because hf had a red check on him. I'll dive hopeless and see what people think about him and get back to you, but right now the main reason why not hopless is that OWS is absolutely 100% scum

On October 10 2014 08:44 liancourt wrote:


pro scum strat picking one person before he does anything. Town should be looking at the whole picture and finding things odd in it not tunnel visioning one player and seeing if he fucks up or not. It's like you're saying you wanted to find any reasons which I can blame him for being scummy.

On October 10 2014 08:46 liancourt wrote:


the answer is apparently this one, but I'm gonna say the thing about RNG because everyone else thinks so. Yea so go analyze that and this post.

On October 10 2014 08:55 liancourt wrote:


how about actually doing something besides talking to me or asking others' opinions of me?

how about something not related tome like... giving reads on others hmm? then i can analyze you. Or maybe you don't wnat that to happen so you're having this nonsensical farce with me that's getting absolutely nowhere.