EPTVery minimal input cause busy this weekend. Ill be pretty free on sunday forward
Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
Very minimal input cause busy this weekend. Ill be pretty free on sunday forward | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
i'd probably lynch slam first. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
liancourt | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:56 liancourt wrote: it must be because i like vanilla ice cream plain as can be Hmm claims in first post On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote: I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that. Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. i don't see why we couldn't read oats for the interaction. I think you can look into it, the he is reacting is very in the opposite direction of his "joke" so much so that its odd he even did the joke in the first place if he really truly feels like that. I disagree that bats looks scummy for something like this. Comes from a town mindset in my eyes, to be catching scum. I think you have actually moved up to my #1 scum | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 07 2014 01:27 liancourt wrote: Town mindset? Please explain how its a town mindset that bats has. And why am I scum? I find the act of seeking to trap someone town mindset, specially within the start of the game. It generates something to talk about which is good. You. Claimed with your first post in a "cute way" i don't like that. The way you are interacting with the oats/bats situation is weird, sets off my scumdar | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 07 2014 02:16 Alakaslam wrote: Hello Bamcis chef of the east side of the west. You said I was skummi earlier with no reasons I wants your reezinz you claimed #lynchwithfire how ever i don't like the smurff more since his claim was his first post + in a cute way | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 07 2014 02:10 ObviousOne wrote: ##vote ObviousOne i suppose i'd lynch someone wanting to lynch themselves. Considering its against the rules and all | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
im going with yes | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
#prepthebadwagons | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 07 2014 01:27 liancourt wrote: Town mindset? Please explain how its a town mindset that bats has. And why am I scum? This is my frist prod. Now lets look at the questions he asks. Interested in why bats is town (cool fine) interested in why "he is scum" , not "why are you reading me scum" Now the reason i am reading him scum for these 2 posts is because of how he approches the situation. Its very early day 1, and its "we can't scum read oats for this" yet "i agree he over reacted" how ever "i think he joked" you kinda see the ebb and flow of this guys play. And this kind of talking is going to be very repetitive and not productive for town. He isn't taking a stance on situations, he is giving himself room for error, its overtly cautious play. Now the reason for quoting his soft / hard claim. I find his commenting on oats combined with his claim contradicting. He has an asap claim (after slam) that he is VT. (so he is following in the foot steps of someone else) Then admits the only one option to claim and that's VT, and is against that bats did anything helpful. (and bats is likely scummy for doing so) Yet he doesn't actually calls bat scum for it. "it is a perfect excuse for scum to say" He isn't calling bats scum, he is just saying bats could be scum for making that play. There fore he isn't taking a stance on bats. On October 07 2014 01:38 liancourt wrote: Id take out hf because I agree with his points on hopeless. Commenting on slams scum team. He takes out HF for agreeing with hopeless, yet he really hasn't said much on myself. Sure he has all ready called bats as "maybe scum" Yet he hasn't talked about me at all. If anything this points to an omgus reaction to me calling him out. On October 07 2014 09:37 liancourt wrote: From day 1 what I'm getting is oats just over reacting OO acting strangely i admit hopeless iffy and hasn't responded to HF I can't seem to get anything else meaningful except for the fact that damdred and gracks seem to be only questioning others and not really saying anything themselves. I really don't like this post, its a generalization of whats going on, with no effort to further the game. He has been against RNG lynch, but is "coming around" on the lead wagon with "OO" is strange sure... Again, he doesn't have a case of his own, or pushing anyone he thinks is scummy. Just content with small town reads here and there, 1 liners. On October 07 2014 18:00 liancourt wrote: At first I was thinking of BH because of his RNG but then obi and slam says it's his original playstyle so I'm a bit reluctant to think of him as scum and BH's posts seem legit also. Then there's grack who voted for OO. Following a random vote in my eyes is pretty scummy to me, but then he switched votes so I'm back to null. And then you have obi and HF. HF does have valid points and I think obi is just voting HF just because HF is voting for him. In my eyes it's two townies fighting. We have the overreacting oats I town read him earlier if i recall correctly due to his reactions in the earlier part of the thread. The iffy hopeless, I haven't been paying attention to his posts for some reason so I need to see his filter. I'll come back on this. Although I hate to admit it OO does seem strange the way he was reacting. It'd mean I'd have to vote for a random vote which I'm reluctant in doing so because it'd go against my principles. Bats the trapper seems pretty townie to me deducing from his earlier interactions with oats. I think this leaves damd, palmar and storr? Damd is asking questions here and there kind of like an out fighter not giving away too much. Palmar and storr haven't really done anything worth mentioning. So assuming there's 3 scum I'd pick these three. But I'll wait until tomorrow until they post to be sure. Maybe they'll bring in some fresh content that we're missing. Lastly there's you, I also need to look at your filter so I'll comeback on this. The question is, who does he think are scummy? 1. bh. Null 2. grack Null 3. obi hf 2 town fighting 4. oats town 5. hopeless is iffy, hasn't been paying attention to him. 6. Back to OO being strange 7. bats town So "damd palmar storr" as mafia? (yes he puts it in a question mark. Is he unsure he walked through everyone? is he sure he picked the right people to call mafia? 2 people fairly inactive. ) His scum read on damd is "not giving away to much" since he only asks questions and scum read on palmar + storr "haven't done anything worth mentioning" And of course ends with "but ill wait until tomorrow until they opst to be sure" he is leaving himself an out, an escape to make sure people don't read to much into what he is saying. He was asked a direct question of who he thinks are scum. And the response is in its basic form, a list post full with null kinda towns strange iffy, and 2 inactive people as possible mafia. This is scummy play. On October 07 2014 18:34 liancourt wrote: See i don't like this "well last game blah blah blah..." I can't emphathize with you if you use this kind of logic. I'll have to read storr's filter then. So do we just leave the 2 people to keep not talking? I don't know about you but I lean more towards scum reading those who make excuses for their inactivity and what not than reading them as null. I guess you could say it's the same reasoning behind why I don't like randm voting. I can't get what they're thinking if they vote random or do nothing. Just makes me think they're low lying scum. I don't think I ever said storr and damd were a better lynch than OO. I said I was reluctant on OO because it would mean following the random vote which I'm kinda against. I can still wait on more info on storr and damd before i make my final decison so it's ok. Questioned again on who his scum are and the big thing that points out is "i don't think i ever said storr and damd were a better lynch than OO" How ever by the virtue of his list post he did. He points out as OO being possible town, and then STRANGE. And ends with 3 scum within palmar damd storr" More overly defensive posting, and avoiding of finding scum. So liancourt is content with asking questions, giving light town reads, as a claimed vt, he is unwilling to actually pressure anyone. #LYNCHWITHFIRE ##Vote liancourt | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
yeah thats super town pro thing to do MY BAD | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 08 2014 00:56 Holyflare wrote: it's not a list post it's a reasoned out post about what his reads are in a direct response to someone asking him he he thought was mafia, it follows what I see as a train of thought and a process of elimination which is pretty towny imo And the end result is no one as mafia | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
His only "scum read" is then damd which is for asking questions and not giving information. Which that read will change of course when damd talks... you see the pattern. .. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On October 08 2014 01:13 Holyflare wrote: his scum reads would include oo but he's hesitant to add him there and unless you come up with better ideas of who are mafia then you can't really criticise his mafia suspects WRONG...... Nice try to deflect | ||
| ||
