| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 10:59 IAmRobik wrote: Is this a new thing where people just give reads and don't explain them whatsoever. WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY? And why vote Koshi over Sloosh? I think he's just stirring shit up. We can safely ignore this vote. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 11:30 IAmRobik wrote: Did you just ask him the question I asked him and then answered the question for him? Have you played this game before? Like wtf are you even doing? Like, I asked wtf, and because he didn't respond, I came to the conclusion that he is just stirring shit up. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 11:56 ritoky wrote: what do you make of the fact that he is not the first person to do it. in fact yamato77 basically did the exact same thing. why didn't you question him? I also asked yamato why. Read my filter. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 12:48 ritoky wrote: ok then, here's a better question. why do you not care about people responding to your questions when you find them odd/scummy? I think if they wanted to give a reason they would have given it by now. By elimination, they obviously don't want to give a reason, and the only reason I can think of why someone would blatantly refuse to explain is because they are trolling. It's just a few hours into the game, don't read too deeply into it. We will find out more about everyone's intentions as this day goes on. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 12:54 gobbledydook wrote: I think if they wanted to give a reason they would have given it by now. By elimination, they obviously don't want to give a reason, and the only reason I can think of why someone would blatantly refuse to explain is because they are trolling. It's just a few hours into the game, don't read too deeply into it. We will find out more about everyone's intentions as this day goes on. To clarify, if someone pulled this shit in the last 24 hours of this day or even day 2 onwards, that would be really bad and I would be sure to press them for a reason. But it's still early enough that trolling is to be expected. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:03 Sylencia wrote: From N2+ depending on how it goes (still interpreting this setup) shouldn't the Angelic Protection + Oracle visit line up instead? If town makes it clear who is the ideal target to protect before the night falls, it could free up the Inquisitor to start checking others. Naturally the plan doesn't work if a witch is killed D1, but that's already a win. Also, the flaw in following this plan N1 is by lining up who is getting checked, they will either be confirmed witch regardless (they won't kill their own teammate obviously) or they're going to die and the inquisitor check is wasted. Not sure if I actually like that. We can't rely on Angelic Protection until we know town outnumber witches in the angels qt. Which we can't know until we use the oracle proc. Remember we don't even know if we lynched witch or not until we actually check! This is why I suggest the inquisitor+oracle check. Regarding the witches killing the inquisitor/oracle check, that's fine. If we check a dubious person and then witches decide to kill that person to stop the inquisitor check, then good, it leaves the strong town players alive. If they kill someone else, good, now the inquisitor gets the check off. Also I probably shouldn't have to remind anyone, but don't claim unless you would either win on that day, or town would lose if the claim was not made. Because soup exists :/ | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:05 IAmRobik wrote: The discussion about checking is over...everyone is checking me. Doing anything else is stupid. This insures that the most information is garnered.  no. I do not see how you are a particularly good target for a n1 check. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:29 IAmRobik wrote: If everyone uses their powers on me (including the witches) then information will be gathered. Don't be a donkey that could be said for checking anyone. you just want to be loved amirite | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:31 IAmRobik wrote: IMPORTANT: As soon as you enter angel chat, you MUST instantly claim your role. FUCK NO that's just asking to get souped. The angels cannot communicate with the town, but the witches in angel QT can still speak in witch QT. so if you claim in angel qt you are just informing scum who you are, making it easier to soup? | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:37 Oatsmaster wrote: Who gives a shit dude? Why are you caring about this rather than caring who's scum? Why is koshi and sloosh scum you still haven't answered bro | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
and how would you know? I assumed that witches wouldn't be banned from the witch qt on death. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:40 geript wrote: I forgot this. The first post you make in Angel Chat should be your role. Don't lie. This helps the angels determine who was a witch as they have a harder time instaclaiming (it's far from impossible though). Unless I get confirmation that the dead witch can't talk to the alive witch, I disagree. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:41 Oatsmaster wrote: Really really bad entry. Why speculate on the setup with your first and second post and not eve bother about the main part of the game. You do realise that we can lynch someone today right? TODAY. Top 3 scum reads now syl WHY ARE SLOOSH AND KOSHI SCUM | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
Assuming you are correct, then yes, you should claim as soon as you die. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:47 Oatsmaster wrote: This right here. Feels so much like scum knowing who's town. And making the least suspicious vote for the holy grail. Also he didn't vote for himself or have any intention of voting for himself. The optimal play as town is ensuring you get the items. Koshi does not care about that. He cares about not drawing suspicion to himself by voting himself. Wrong focus. Scum. Lynch OKAY WHAT ABOUT SLOOSH | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:50 Sylencia wrote: No, because the proposal given is an isolated train of thought that isn't connected (as far as I know) to the rest of the game that is going on. Apparently lurking instead of tryingto expand on an idea when I can't actually do anything else is scummy though so.. ok. wait what lurking is scummy when did you ever see anyone say lurking is towny | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 13:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Ritoky, why did sloosh ask you that softball question? Was there previous interaction that I missed? Sloosh is scum cause he hasn't done anything useful yet. Just asked a few useless questions. So he has the time to post a bit but doesn't do anything with that time. What do you think of sloosh's defense of Haru? I would consider that to be 'doing something', but yes apart from defending haru he really hasn't done anything. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2605 Posts
On September 04 2014 15:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: Don't talk about setup. You can only help scum. Don't claim unless i tell you to. Period. har har har har why should any of us listen to you. and what are your reafs. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
BASILISK vs Shopify Rebellion
Team Liquid vs Team Falcon
OSC
CrankTV Team League
Shopify Rebellion vs Team Liquid
BASILISK vs Team Falcon
Replay Cast
The PondCast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
MaNa vs Gerald
Rogue vs GuMiho
ByuN vs Spirit
herO vs Solar
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
